BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24985552)

  • 1. Predicting the risk of harboring high-grade disease for patients diagnosed with prostate cancer scored as Gleason ≤ 6 on biopsy cores.
    Seisen T; Roudot-Thoraval F; Bosset PO; Beaugerie A; Allory Y; Vordos D; Abbou CC; De La Taille A; Salomon L
    World J Urol; 2015 Jun; 33(6):787-92. PubMed ID: 24985552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of risk factors for Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy in a Chinese cohort.
    Zhang B; Wu S; Zhang Y; Guo M; Liu R
    Cancer Med; 2021 Nov; 10(21):7772-7780. PubMed ID: 34528767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume.
    Corcoran NM; Casey RG; Hong MK; Pedersen J; Connolly S; Peters J; Harewood L; Gleave ME; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Goldenberg SL
    BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22085203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prostate-specific antigen vs prostate-specific antigen density as a predictor of upgrading in men diagnosed with Gleason 6 prostate cancer by contemporary multicore prostate biopsy.
    Oh JJ; Hong SK; Lee JK; Lee BK; Lee S; Kwon OS; Byun SS; Lee SE
    BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt B):E494-9. PubMed ID: 22540236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A biopsy-integrated algorithm for determining Gleason 6 upgrading risk stratifies risk of active surveillance failure in prostate cancer.
    Blute ML; Shiau JM; Truong M; Shi F; Abel EJ; Downs TM; Jarrard DF
    World J Urol; 2017 May; 35(5):729-735. PubMed ID: 27631325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pathological upgrading in prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance: Does prostate-specific antigen density matter?
    Jin BS; Kang SH; Kim DY; Oh HG; Kim CI; Moon GH; Kwon TG; Park JS
    Korean J Urol; 2015 Sep; 56(9):624-9. PubMed ID: 26366274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical and pathologic predictors of Gleason sum upgrading in patients after radical prostatectomy: results from a single institution series.
    Tilki D; Schlenker B; John M; Buchner A; Stanislaus P; Gratzke C; Karl A; Tan GY; Ergün S; Tewari AK; Stief CG; Seitz M; Reich O
    Urol Oncol; 2011; 29(5):508-14. PubMed ID: 19837614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Role of PI-RADS Version 2 for Prediction of Upgrading in Biopsy-Proven Prostate Cancer With Gleason Score 6.
    Song W; Bang SH; Jeon HG; Jeong BC; Seo SI; Jeon SS; Choi HY; Kim CK; Lee HM
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2018 Aug; 16(4):281-287. PubMed ID: 29550198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Clinically predictive factors of Gleason score upgrading in patients after radical prostatectomy].
    Zuo Q; Zhang F; Huang Y; Ma LL; Lu M; Lu J
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2016 Aug; 48(4):603-606. PubMed ID: 29263497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prostate-specific antigen 10-20 ng/mL: A predictor of degree of upgrading to ≥8 among patients with biopsy Gleason score 6.
    Santok GD; Abdel Raheem A; Kim LH; Chang K; Lum TG; Chung BH; Choi YD; Rha KH
    Investig Clin Urol; 2017 Mar; 58(2):90-97. PubMed ID: 28261677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A solitary positive prostate cancer biopsy does not predict a unilateral lesion in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Koie T; Mitsuzuka K; Narita S; Yoneyama T; Kawamura S; Kaiho Y; Tsuchiya N; Tochigi T; Habuchi T; Arai Y; Ohyama C
    Scand J Urol; 2015 Apr; 49(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 25165894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bioptic intraprostatic chronic inflammation predicts adverse pathology at radical prostatectomy in patients with low-grade prostate cancer.
    Sanguedolce F; Falagario UG; Castellan P; Di Nauta M; Silecchia G; Bruno SM; Russo D; Treacy PJ; Tewari AK; Montironi R; Carrieri G; Cormio L
    Urol Oncol; 2020 Oct; 38(10):793.e19-793.e25. PubMed ID: 32220548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development and multi-institutional validation of an upgrading risk tool for Gleason 6 prostate cancer.
    Truong M; Slezak JA; Lin CP; Iremashvili V; Sado M; Razmaria AA; Leverson G; Soloway MS; Eggener SE; Abel EJ; Downs TM; Jarrard DF
    Cancer; 2013 Nov; 119(22):3992-4002. PubMed ID: 24006289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Incidence of upgrading and upstaging in patients with low-volume Gleason score 3+4 prostate cancers at biopsy: finding a new group eligible for active surveillance.
    Park HJ; Ha YS; Park SY; Kim YT; Lee TY; Kim JH; Lee DH; Kim WJ; Kim IY
    Urol Int; 2013; 90(3):301-5. PubMed ID: 23391718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Low serum testosterone predicts upgrading and upstaging of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.
    Gao Y; Jiang CY; Mao SK; Cui D; Hao KY; Zhao W; Jiang Q; Ruan Y; Xia SJ; Han BM
    Asian J Androl; 2016; 18(4):639-43. PubMed ID: 26732103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prostate biopsy clinical and pathological variables that predict significant grading changes in patients with intermediate and high grade prostate cancer.
    Moussa AS; Li J; Soriano M; Klein EA; Dong F; Jones JS
    BJU Int; 2009 Jan; 103(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 18782303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Unilateral positive biopsies in low risk prostate cancer patients diagnosed with extended transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy schemes do not predict unilateral prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy.
    Gallina A; Maccagnano C; Suardi N; Capitanio U; Abdollah F; Raber M; Salonia A; Scattoni V; Rigatti P; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(2 Pt 2):E64-8. PubMed ID: 22093108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of a new nomogram to predict insignificant prostate cancer in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.
    Kim TH; Jeon HG; Jeong BC; Seo SI; Jeon SS; Choi HY; Lee HM
    Scand J Urol; 2017 Feb; 51(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 28168924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adverse Disease Features in Gleason Score 3 + 4 "Favorable Intermediate-Risk" Prostate Cancer: Implications for Active Surveillance.
    Morlacco A; Cheville JC; Rangel LJ; Gearman DJ; Karnes RJ
    Eur Urol; 2017 Sep; 72(3):442-447. PubMed ID: 27574819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tertiary Gleason pattern in radical prostatectomy specimens is associated with worse outcomes than the next higher Gleason score group in localized prostate cancer.
    Özsoy M; D'Andrea D; Moschini M; Foerster B; Abufaraj M; Mathieu R; Briganti A; Karakiewicz PI; Roupret M; Seitz C; Czech AK; Susani M; Shariat SF
    Urol Oncol; 2018 Apr; 36(4):158.e1-158.e6. PubMed ID: 29288003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.