151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24985743)
1. Who owns a dissertation, and why does it matter?
Kearney MH
Res Nurs Health; 2014 Aug; 37(4):261-4. PubMed ID: 24985743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The dissertation manuscript option, internet posting, and publication.
Baggs JG
Res Nurs Health; 2011 Apr; 34(2):89-90. PubMed ID: 21319170
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Academic authorship guidelines for capstone and dissertation work.
Resnick B
Geriatr Nurs; 2015; 36(6):421-2. PubMed ID: 26521028
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [We can publish your dissertation free of charge].
Rosenberg J
Ugeskr Laeger; 2009 Nov; 171(48):3503. PubMed ID: 19944047
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Who owns your data? Part III challenges to academic freedom.
Mills MD
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Sep; 19(5):328-329. PubMed ID: 30105777
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The ethics of authorship.
Kennedy MS; Roush K; Barnsteiner J
Am J Nurs; 2012 Sep; 112(9):7. PubMed ID: 22932033
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Personal computers spur drive to keep control over copyright.
Dalton R
Nature; 1998 Nov; 396(6709):293. PubMed ID: 9845057
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Technology is great … except when it doesn't work.
Powers PJ
Am J Med; 2011 Nov; 124(11):991-2. PubMed ID: 22017774
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Who should own scientific papers?
Bachrach S; Berry RS; Blume M; von Foerster T; Fowler A; Ginsparg P; Heller S; Kestner N; Odlyzko A; Okerson A; Wigington R; Moffat A
Science; 1998 Sep; 281(5382):1459-60. PubMed ID: 9750115
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A matter of trust: introducing the journal scientific integrity policy.
McDonald JM; Eisemann MG; Cox AE
Am J Pathol; 2007 Jul; 171(1):1. PubMed ID: 17591946
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Scientific misconduct. Cleaning up the paper trail.
Couzin J; Unger K
Science; 2006 Apr; 312(5770):38-43. PubMed ID: 16601164
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Integrity in publishing: update on policies and statements on authorship, duplicate publications, and conflict of interest.
Yoshikawa TT; Ouslander JG
J Am Geriatr Soc; 2007 Feb; 55(2):155-7. PubMed ID: 17302649
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The Copyright Issue.
Katz A
Oncol Nurs Forum; 2019 May; 46(3):267-268. PubMed ID: 31007256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. To integrity and beyond.
Moyer VA; First LR
Pediatrics; 2011 Apr; 127(4):776-8. PubMed ID: 21460100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Dissertation criteria].
Remschmidt H
Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother; 1998 Mar; 26(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 9553226
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Collaborative production and experimental labor: two models of dissertation authorship in the eighteenth century.
Chang KM
Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci; 2010 Dec; 41(4):347-55. PubMed ID: 21112009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Recognition, reward and responsibility: why the authorship of scientific papers matters.
Wager E
Maturitas; 2009 Feb; 62(2):109-12. PubMed ID: 19147308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A matter of trust.
Nat Immunol; 2006 Oct; 7(10):1005. PubMed ID: 16985491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Walking the copyright tightrope.
Baker JD
AORN J; 2013 Feb; 97(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 23356917
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Co-publication-what you always wanted to know but have been afraid to ask!
Pearlman AS
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2011 Mar; 24(3):346-7. PubMed ID: 21338868
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
