242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24986370)
1. Effects of different abutment material and surgical insertion torque on the marginal adaptation of an internal conical interface: an in vitro study.
Farronato D; Pieroni S; Mangano FG; Briguglio F; Re D
J Prosthodont Res; 2014 Oct; 58(4):230-6. PubMed ID: 24986370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the sealing capability of implants to titanium and zirconia abutments against Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia, and Fusobacterium nucleatum under different screw torque values.
Smith NA; Turkyilmaz I
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):561-7. PubMed ID: 24656409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Experimental research on the relationship between fit accuracy and fracture resistance of zirconia abutments.
Sui X; Wei H; Wang D; Han Y; Deng J; Wang Y; Wang J; Yang J
J Dent; 2014 Oct; 42(10):1353-9. PubMed ID: 24561040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative study of torque resistance and microgaps between a combined Octatorx-cone connection and an internal hexagon implant-abutment connection.
Khongkhunthian P; Khongkhunthian S; Weerawatprachya W; Pongpat K; Aunmeungtong W
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 May; 113(5):420-4. PubMed ID: 25794913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Customized Abutments Made from Titanium and a Machinable Precious Alloy.
Lee JH; Park JM; Park EJ; Koak JY; Kim SK; Heo SJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(1):92-100. PubMed ID: 26800166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Displacement and performance of abutments in narrow-diameter implants with different internal connections.
Jacobs N; Seghi R; Johnston WM; Yilmaz B
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jan; 127(1):100-106. PubMed ID: 33413986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro assessment of three types of zirconia implant abutments under static load.
Kim JS; Raigrodski AJ; Flinn BD; Rubenstein JE; Chung KH; Mancl LA
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 23566607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of different torque levels on the implant-abutment interface in a conical internal connection.
Gehrke SA; Shibli JA; Aramburú Junior JS; de Val JE; Calvo-Girardo JL; Dedavid BA
Braz Oral Res; 2016; 30():. PubMed ID: 26981760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The behavior of a zirconia or metal abutment on the implant-abutment interface during cyclic loading.
Queiroz DA; Hagee N; Lee DJ; Zheng F
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Aug; 124(2):211-216. PubMed ID: 31810616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fracture strength of zirconia implant abutments on narrow diameter implants with internal and external implant abutment connections: A study on the titanium resin base concept.
Sailer I; Asgeirsson AG; Thoma DS; Fehmer V; Aspelund T; Özcan M; Pjetursson BE
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Apr; 29(4):411-423. PubMed ID: 29527740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Marginal accuracy of three implant-ceramic abutment configurations.
Baldassarri M; Hjerppe J; Romeo D; Fickl S; Thompson VP; Stappert CF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):537-43. PubMed ID: 22616046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of internal hexagonal index on removal torque and tensile removal force of different Morse taper connection abutments.
de Oliveira Silva TS; Mendes Alencar SM; da Silva Valente V; de Moura CDVS
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 May; 117(5):621-627. PubMed ID: 27881313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Compatibility of Nonoriginal Abutments With Implants: Evaluation of Microgap at the Implant-Abutment Interface, With Original and Nonoriginal Abutments.
Duraisamy R; Krishnan CS; Ramasubramanian H; Sampathkumar J; Mariappan S; Navarasampatti Sivaprakasam A
Implant Dent; 2019 Jun; 28(3):289-295. PubMed ID: 31124826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Deformation of implant abutments after framework connection using strain gauges.
Hollweg H; Jacques LB; da Silva Moura M; Bianco VC; Souza EA; Rubo JH
J Oral Implantol; 2012 Apr; 38(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 22568468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bacterial colonization of the implant-abutment interface using an in vitro dynamic loading model.
Koutouzis T; Wallet S; Calderon N; Lundgren T
J Periodontol; 2011 Apr; 82(4):613-8. PubMed ID: 21043798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Characteristics of implant-CAD/CAM abutment connections of two different internal connection systems.
Sumi T; Braian M; Shimada A; Shibata N; Takeshita K; Vandeweghe S; Coelho PG; Wennerberg A; Jimbo R
J Oral Rehabil; 2012 May; 39(5):391-8. PubMed ID: 22175784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of Intentional Overload on Joint Stability of Internal Implant-Abutment Connection System with Different Diameter.
Lee JH; Lee W; Huh YH; Park CJ; Cho LR
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e649-e656. PubMed ID: 28872722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparative study on microgap of premade abutments and abutments cast in base metal alloys.
Lalithamma JJ; Mallan SA; Murukan PA; Zarina R
J Oral Implantol; 2014 Jun; 40(3):239-49. PubMed ID: 24914909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of tightening torque on screw stress and formation of implant-abutment microgaps: A finite element analysis.
Honório Tonin BS; He Y; Ye N; Chew HP; Fok A
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jun; 127(6):882-889. PubMed ID: 33472752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fracture resistance of titanium and zirconia abutments: an in vitro study.
Foong JK; Judge RB; Palamara JE; Swain MV
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):304-12. PubMed ID: 23684280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
