666 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24986743)
1. Relative biological effectiveness variation along monoenergetic and modulated Bragg peaks of a 62-MeV therapeutic proton beam: a preclinical assessment.
Chaudhary P; Marshall TI; Perozziello FM; Manti L; Currell FJ; Hanton F; McMahon SJ; Kavanagh JN; Cirrone GA; Romano F; Prise KM; Schettino G
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Sep; 90(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 24986743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Variations in the RBE for cell killing along the depth-dose profile of a modulated proton therapy beam.
Britten RA; Nazaryan V; Davis LK; Klein SB; Nichiporov D; Mendonca MS; Wolanski M; Nie X; George J; Keppel C
Radiat Res; 2013 Jan; 179(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 23148508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Investigating the Implications of a Variable RBE on Proton Dose Fractionation Across a Clinical Pencil Beam Scanned Spread-Out Bragg Peak.
Marshall TI; Chaudhary P; Michaelidesová A; Vachelová J; Davídková M; Vondráček V; Schettino G; Prise KM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 May; 95(1):70-77. PubMed ID: 27084630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiobiological characterization of two therapeutic proton beams with different initial energy spectra used at the Institut Curie Proton Therapy Center in Orsay.
Calugaru V; Nauraye C; Noël G; Giocanti N; Favaudon V; Mégnin-Chanet F
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Nov; 81(4):1136-43. PubMed ID: 21075549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Systematics of relative biological effectiveness measurements for proton radiation along the spread out Bragg peak: experimental validation of the local effect model.
Grün R; Friedrich T; Krämer M; Scholz M
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Feb; 62(3):890-908. PubMed ID: 28072575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is the dose-averaged LET a reliable predictor for the relative biological effectiveness?
Grün R; Friedrich T; Traneus E; Scholz M
Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):1064-1074. PubMed ID: 30565705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interaction between the biological effects of high- and low-LET radiation dose components in a mixed field exposure.
Mason AJ; Giusti V; Green S; Munck af Rosenschöld P; Beynon TD; Hopewell JW
Int J Radiat Biol; 2011 Dec; 87(12):1162-72. PubMed ID: 21923301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Monte Carlo simulations of therapeutic proton beams for relative biological effectiveness of double-strand break.
Wang CC; Hsiao Y; Lee CC; Chao TC; Wang CC; Tung CJ
Int J Radiat Biol; 2012 Jan; 88(1-2):158-63. PubMed ID: 21823821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Response of a radioresistant human melanoma cell line along the proton spread-out Bragg peak.
Petrović I; Ristić-Fira A; Todorović D; Korićanac L; Valastro L; Cirrone P; Cuttone G
Int J Radiat Biol; 2010 Sep; 86(9):742-51. PubMed ID: 20597839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Microdosimetric measurements of a monoenergetic and modulated Bragg Peaks of 62 MeV therapeutic proton beam with a synthetic single crystal diamond microdosimeter.
Verona C; Cirrone GAP; Magrin G; Marinelli M; Palomba S; Petringa G; Rinati GV
Med Phys; 2020 Nov; 47(11):5791-5801. PubMed ID: 32974938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A mechanism-based approach to predict the relative biological effectiveness of protons and carbon ions in radiation therapy.
Frese MC; Yu VK; Stewart RD; Carlson DJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 May; 83(1):442-50. PubMed ID: 22099045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Empirical model estimation of relative biological effectiveness for proton beam therapy.
Chen Y; Ahmad S
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Apr; 149(2):116-23. PubMed ID: 21593038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A model for the relative biological effectiveness of protons: the tissue specific parameter α/β of photons is a predictor for the sensitivity to LET changes.
Wedenberg M; Lind BK; Hårdemark B
Acta Oncol; 2013 Apr; 52(3):580-8. PubMed ID: 22909391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) values for proton beam therapy.
Paganetti H; Niemierko A; Ancukiewicz M; Gerweck LE; Goitein M; Loeffler JS; Suit HD
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Jun; 53(2):407-21. PubMed ID: 12023146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Significance and implementation of RBE variations in proton beam therapy.
Paganetti H
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2003 Oct; 2(5):413-26. PubMed ID: 14529306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A radiobiological study of carbon ions of different linear energy transfer in resistant human malignant cell lines.
Petrović IM; Ristić Fira AM; Keta OD; Petković VD; Petringa G; Cirrone P; Cuttone G
Int J Radiat Biol; 2020 Nov; 96(11):1400-1412. PubMed ID: 32910708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Variable RBE in proton therapy: comparison of different model predictions and their influence on clinical-like scenarios.
Giovannini G; Böhlen T; Cabal G; Bauer J; Tessonnier T; Frey K; Debus J; Mairani A; Parodi K
Radiat Oncol; 2016 May; 11():68. PubMed ID: 27185038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) values for proton beam therapy. Variations as a function of biological endpoint, dose, and linear energy transfer.
Paganetti H
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Nov; 59(22):R419-72. PubMed ID: 25361443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Nuclear interactions in proton therapy: dose and relative biological effect distributions originating from primary and secondary particles.
Paganetti H
Phys Med Biol; 2002 Mar; 47(5):747-64. PubMed ID: 11931469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Calculation of relative biological effectiveness for proton beams using biological weighting functions.
Paganetti H; Olko P; Kobus H; Becker R; Schmitz T; Waligorski MP; Filges D; Müller-Gärtner HW
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Feb; 37(3):719-29. PubMed ID: 9112472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
