These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24987664)

  • 1. Facial profile preferences, self-awareness and perception among groups of people in the United Arab Emirates.
    Al Taki A; Guidoum A
    J Orthod Sci; 2014 Apr; 3(2):55-61. PubMed ID: 24987664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparative assessment of the perception of Chinese facial profile esthetics.
    Soh J; Chew MT; Wong HB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jun; 127(6):692-9. PubMed ID: 15953894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An Asian community's perspective on facial profile attractiveness.
    Soh J; Chew MT; Wong HB
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2007 Feb; 35(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 17244134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Facial attractiveness of skeletal class I and class II malocclusion as perceived by laypeople, patients and clinicians.
    Pace M; Cioffi I; D'antò V; Valletta A; Valletta R; Amato M
    Minerva Stomatol; 2018 Jun; 67(3):77-85. PubMed ID: 29308854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Facial profile study using 3-dimensional photographs to assess esthetic preferences of Hong Kong Chinese orthognathic patients and laypersons.
    Tan SK; Leung WK; Tang ATH; Zwahlen RA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Feb; 161(2):e105-e113. PubMed ID: 34531091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Thresholds of Abnormality Perception in Facial Esthetics among Laypersons and Dental Professionals: Profile Esthetics.
    Alrbata RH; Alfaqih AK; Almhaidat MR; Al-Tarawneh AM
    Int J Dent; 2020; 2020():2068961. PubMed ID: 33101413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differences in facial profile and dental esthetic perceptions between young adults and orthodontists.
    Yin L; Jiang M; Chen W; Smales RJ; Wang Q; Tang L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jun; 145(6):750-6. PubMed ID: 24880845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Facial profile esthetic preferences: perception in two Brazilian states.
    Oliveira MD; Silveira BL; Mattos CT; Marquezan M
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(3):88-95. PubMed ID: 26154461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Esthetic preferences of orthodontists, oral surgeons, and laypersons for Persian facial profiles.
    Imani MM; Sanei E; Niaki EA; Shahroudi AS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Sep; 154(3):412-420. PubMed ID: 30173845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Photos vs silhouettes for evaluation of profile esthetics between white and black evaluators.
    Pithon MM; Silva IS; Almeida IO; Nery MS; de Souza ML; Barbosa G; Dos Santos AF; da Silva Coqueiro R
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Mar; 84(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 23957665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of education and gender on the esthetic perception of facial profile.
    Torul D; Omezli MM
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2022 Feb; 17(1):88-99. PubMed ID: 35175010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Antero-Posterior Lip Position in Most Favored Facial Profile of Jaipur Population.
    Sharma K; Trehan M; Singh S; Mahlawat H; Kenkare P; Jayavarma S A
    Cureus; 2022 Aug; 14(8):e27774. PubMed ID: 36106287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Esthetic evaluation of Asian-Chinese profiles from a white perspective.
    Chan EK; Soh J; Petocz P; Darendeliler MA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):532-8. PubMed ID: 18405817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Esthetic perception of facial profile changes in Class II patients treated with Herbst or Forsus appliances.
    Moresca AHK; de Moraes ND; Topolski F; Flores-Mir C; Moro A; Moresca RC; Correr GM
    Angle Orthod; 2020 Jul; 90(4):571-577. PubMed ID: 33378491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Orthodontists and lay people rate masculine soft tissue profiles similarly but feminine soft tissue profiles differently.
    Einy S; Miri T; Katzhendler E; Aizenbud D; Emanuela K; Zaslansky P
    Quintessence Int; 2021; 52(1):72-79. PubMed ID: 32954390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of esthetics perception and satisfaction of facial profile among male adolescents and adults with different profiles.
    Eslami N; Omidkhoda M; Shafaee H; Mozhdehifard M
    J Orthod Sci; 2016; 5(2):47-51. PubMed ID: 27127750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What do black patients expect from orthodontic treatment? The aesthetic perception of facial profile between orthodontists and black laypersons.
    Souza DB; Oliveira AI; Gouvêa GR; Santamaria-Jr M
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2022; 27(4):e2220519. PubMed ID: 36074432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attractiveness of facial profiles as rated by individuals with different levels of education.
    Hönn M; Dietz K; Eiselt ML; Göz G
    J Orofac Orthop; 2008 Jan; 69(1):20-30. PubMed ID: 18213458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perception of Facial Profile: How You Feel About Yourself.
    Trehan M; Naqvi ZA; Sharma S
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2011; 4(2):109-11. PubMed ID: 27672248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Self-perception of facial esthetics by patients with different profiles compared with assessments of orthodontists and lay people.
    Volpato GH; de Almeida-Pedrin RR; Oltramari PVP; Freire Fernandes TM; de Almeida MR; de Castro Ferreira Conti AC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2020 Dec; 158(6):840-848. PubMed ID: 33256916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.