417 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24987899)
1. Radioactive seed localization of nonpalpable breast lesions in an academic comprehensive cancer program community hospital setting.
Chiu JC; Ajmal S; Zhu X; Griffith E; Encarnacion T; Barr L
Am Surg; 2014 Jul; 80(7):675-9. PubMed ID: 24987899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Radioactive Seed Localized Excision and Wire Localized Excision of Breast Lesions: A Community Hospital's Experience.
Angarita FA; Acuna SA; Down N; Leung CS; Pirmoradi F; Osman F
Clin Breast Cancer; 2019 Apr; 19(2):e364-e369. PubMed ID: 30718114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Radioactive seed localization for nonpalpable breast lesions: review of 1,000 consecutive procedures at a single institution.
McGhan LJ; McKeever SC; Pockaj BA; Wasif N; Giurescu ME; Walton HA; Gray RJ
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Oct; 18(11):3096-101. PubMed ID: 21947587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The use of radioactive iodine-125 seed localization in patients with non-palpable breast cancer: a comparison with the radioguided occult lesion localization with 99m technetium.
van der Noordaa ME; Pengel KE; Groen E; van Werkhoven E; Rutgers EJ; Loo CE; Vogel W; Vrancken Peeters MJ
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Apr; 41(4):553-8. PubMed ID: 25707349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Experience with seed localization for nonpalpable breast lesions in a public health care system.
Rao R; Moldrem A; Sarode V; White J; Amen M; Rao M; Andrews V; Euhus D; Radford L; Ulissey M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2010 Dec; 17(12):3241-6. PubMed ID: 20535570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Radioactive Seed Localization Versus Wire Localization for Nonpalpable Breast Lesions: A Two-Year Initial Experience at a Large Community Hospital.
Stelle L; Schoenheit T; Brubaker A; Tang X; Qu P; Cradock K; Higham A
Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):131-136. PubMed ID: 29134380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Operative outcomes of conventional specimen radiography versus in-operating room specimen radiography in radioactive seed-localized segmental mastectomies.
Rhee D; Pockaj B; Wasif N; Stucky CC; Pizzitola V; Giurescu M; Patel B; McCarthy J; Gray R
Am J Surg; 2018 Jan; 215(1):151-154. PubMed ID: 28784236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Guiding breast-conserving surgery in patients after neoadjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer: a comparison of radioactive seed localization with the ROLL technique.
Donker M; Drukker CA; Valdés Olmos RA; Rutgers EJ; Loo CE; Sonke GS; Wesseling J; Alderliesten T; Vrancken Peeters MJ
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Aug; 20(8):2569-75. PubMed ID: 23463088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reoperation Rates in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ vs Invasive Breast Cancer After Wire-Guided Breast-Conserving Surgery.
Langhans L; Jensen MB; Talman MM; Vejborg I; Kroman N; Tvedskov TF
JAMA Surg; 2017 Apr; 152(4):378-384. PubMed ID: 28002557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A multicentered, randomized, controlled trial comparing radioguided seed localization to standard wire localization for nonpalpable, invasive and in situ breast carcinomas.
Lovrics PJ; Goldsmith CH; Hodgson N; McCready D; Gohla G; Boylan C; Cornacchi S; Reedijk M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Nov; 18(12):3407-14. PubMed ID: 21533657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sampling of secondary margins decreases the need for re-excision after partial mastectomy.
Guidroz JA; Larrieux G; Liao J; Sugg SL; Scott-Conner CE; Weigel RJ
Surgery; 2011 Oct; 150(4):802-9. PubMed ID: 22000194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radioactive seed localization compared to wire localization in breast-conserving surgery: initial 6-month experience.
Murphy JO; Moo TA; King TA; Van Zee KJ; Villegas KA; Stempel M; Eaton A; St Germain JM; Morris E; Morrow M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Dec; 20(13):4121-7. PubMed ID: 23943024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of introducing an in-theatre intra-operative specimen radiography (IOSR) system on the management of palpable breast cancer within a single unit.
Layfield DM; May DJ; Cutress RI; Richardson C; Agrawal A; Wise M; Yiangou C
Breast; 2012 Aug; 21(4):459-63. PubMed ID: 22119488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Low re-excision rate for positive margins in patients treated with ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery.
Yu CC; Chiang KC; Kuo WL; Shen SC; Lo YF; Chen SC
Breast; 2013 Oct; 22(5):698-702. PubMed ID: 23333255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intraoperative margin assessment and re-excision rate in breast conserving surgery.
Fleming FJ; Hill AD; Mc Dermott EW; O'Doherty A; O'Higgins NJ; Quinn CM
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2004 Apr; 30(3):233-7. PubMed ID: 15028301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outcomes of multiple wire localization for larger breast cancers: when can mastectomy be avoided?
Kirstein LJ; Rafferty E; Specht MC; Moore RH; Taghian AG; Hughes KS; Gadd MA; Smith BL
J Am Coll Surg; 2008 Sep; 207(3):342-6. PubMed ID: 18722938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Breast surgery techniques: preoperative bracketing wire localization by surgeons.
Burkholder HC; Witherspoon LE; Burns RP; Horn JS; Biderman MD
Am Surg; 2007 Jun; 73(6):574-8; discussion 578-9. PubMed ID: 17658094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intraoperative indocyanine green fluorescence guidance for excision of nonpalpable breast cancer.
Liu J; Guo W; Tong M
World J Surg Oncol; 2016 Oct; 14(1):266. PubMed ID: 27756411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predictive Factors for Positive Margin and the Surgical Learning Curve in Non-Palpable Breast Cancer After Wire-Guided Localization - Prospective Study of 214 Consecutive Patients.
Tóth D; Varga Z; Sebő É; Török M; Kovács I
Pathol Oncol Res; 2016 Jan; 22(1):209-15. PubMed ID: 26522009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Novel Technique Using Intraoperative Fluoroscopy as a Tool to Achieve Negative Margins for Wire-Guided Partial Mastectomies.
Beierle SP; Heidel E; Lewis J; Stewart E; McLoughlin J
Am Surg; 2016 Sep; 82(9):e236-7. PubMed ID: 27670531
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]