These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Fractional flow reserve calculation from 3-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography and TIMI frame count: a fast computer model to quantify the functional significance of moderately obstructed coronary arteries. Tu S; Barbato E; Köszegi Z; Yang J; Sun Z; Holm NR; Tar B; Li Y; Rusinaru D; Wijns W; Reiber JH JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jul; 7(7):768-77. PubMed ID: 25060020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Noninvasive CT-based hemodynamic assessment of coronary lesions derived from fast computational analysis: a comparison against fractional flow reserve. Siogkas PK; Anagnostopoulos CD; Liga R; Exarchos TP; Sakellarios AI; Rigas G; Scholte AJHA; Papafaklis MI; Loggitsi D; Pelosi G; Parodi O; Maaniitty T; Michalis LK; Knuuti J; Neglia D; Fotiadis DI Eur Radiol; 2019 Apr; 29(4):2117-2126. PubMed ID: 30324382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A novel noninvasive technology for treatment planning using virtual coronary stenting and computed tomography-derived computed fractional flow reserve. Kim KH; Doh JH; Koo BK; Min JK; Erglis A; Yang HM; Park KW; Lee HY; Kang HJ; Kim YJ; Lee SY; Kim HS JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jan; 7(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 24332418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative flow ratio derived from diagnostic coronary angiography in assessment of patients with intermediate coronary stenosis: a wire-free fractional flow reserve study. Kołtowski Ł; Zaleska M; Maksym J; Tomaniak M; Soliński M; Puchta D; Holm NR; Opolski G; Kochman J Clin Res Cardiol; 2018 Sep; 107(9):858-867. PubMed ID: 30128817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic Performance of In-Procedure Angiography-Derived Quantitative Flow Reserve Compared to Pressure-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve: The FAVOR II Europe-Japan Study. Westra J; Andersen BK; Campo G; Matsuo H; Koltowski L; Eftekhari A; Liu T; Di Serafino L; Di Girolamo D; Escaned J; Nef H; Naber C; Barbierato M; Tu S; Neghabat O; Madsen M; Tebaldi M; Tanigaki T; Kochman J; Somi S; Esposito G; Mercone G; Mejia-Renteria H; Ronco F; Bøtker HE; Wijns W; Christiansen EH; Holm NR J Am Heart Assoc; 2018 Jul; 7(14):. PubMed ID: 29980523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three-dimensional and two-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography, and their prediction of reduced fractional flow reserve. Yong AS; Ng AC; Brieger D; Lowe HC; Ng MK; Kritharides L Eur Heart J; 2011 Feb; 32(3):345-53. PubMed ID: 20705695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Noninvasive diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenosis using CT angiography: diagnostic value of transluminal attenuation gradient and fractional flow reserve computed from coronary CT angiography compared to invasively measured fractional flow reserve. Yoon YE; Choi JH; Kim JH; Park KW; Doh JH; Kim YJ; Koo BK; Min JK; Erglis A; Gwon HC; Choe YH; Choi DJ; Kim HS; Oh BH; Park YB JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Nov; 5(11):1088-96. PubMed ID: 23153908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography for the prediction of functional severity in true bifurcation lesions: Insights from the randomized DK-CRUSH II, III, and IV trials. Zhang YJ; Zhu H; Shi SY; Muramatsu T; Pan DR; Ye F; Zhang JJ; Tian NL; Bourantas CV; Chen SL Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Mar; 87 Suppl 1():589-98. PubMed ID: 26876688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of 3-dimensional and 2-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound for functional assessment of coronary lesions. Nishi T; Kitahara H; Fujimoto Y; Nakayama T; Sugimoto K; Takahara M; Kobayashi Y J Cardiol; 2017 Jan; 69(1):280-286. PubMed ID: 27293021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Coronary CT Angiography-derived Fractional Flow Reserve: Machine Learning Algorithm versus Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling. Tesche C; De Cecco CN; Baumann S; Renker M; McLaurin TW; Duguay TM; Bayer RR; Steinberg DH; Grant KL; Canstein C; Schwemmer C; Schoebinger M; Itu LM; Rapaka S; Sharma P; Schoepf UJ Radiology; 2018 Jul; 288(1):64-72. PubMed ID: 29634438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transluminal attenuation gradient in coronary computed tomography angiography is a novel noninvasive approach to the identification of functionally significant coronary artery stenosis: a comparison with fractional flow reserve. Wong DT; Ko BS; Cameron JD; Nerlekar N; Leung MC; Malaiapan Y; Crossett M; Leong DP; Worthley SG; Troupis J; Meredith IT; Seneviratne SK J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Mar; 61(12):1271-9. PubMed ID: 23414792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of intravascular ultrasound and quantitative angiography in the functional assessment of intermediate coronary lesions: correlation with fractional flow reserve. Naganuma T; Latib A; Costopoulos C; Takagi K; Naim C; Sato K; Miyazaki T; Kawaguchi M; Panoulas VF; Basavarajaiah S; Figini F; Chieffo A; Montorfano M; Carlino M; Colombo A Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2014 Jan; 15(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 24444471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computational quantitative flow ratio to assess functional severity of coronary artery stenosis. Ties D; van Dijk R; Pundziute G; Lipsic E; Vonck TE; van den Heuvel AFM; Vliegenthart R; Oudkerk M; van der Harst P Int J Cardiol; 2018 Nov; 271():36-41. PubMed ID: 30131233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic accuracy and discrimination of ischemia by fractional flow reserve CT using a clinical use rule: results from the Determination of Fractional Flow Reserve by Anatomic Computed Tomographic Angiography study. Thompson AG; Raju R; Blanke P; Yang TH; Mancini GB; Budoff MJ; Norgaard BL; Min JK; Leipsic JA J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2015; 9(2):120-8. PubMed ID: 25819194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Advanced 2-dimensional quantitative coronary angiographic analysis for prediction of fractional flow reserve in intermediate coronary stenoses. Opolski MP; Pregowski J; Kruk M; Kepka C; Staruch AD; Witkowski A J Thorac Imaging; 2014 Jul; 29(4):217-23. PubMed ID: 24247083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Functional assessment of lesion severity without using the pressure wire: coronary imaging and blood flow simulation. Papafaklis MI; Mavrogiannis MC; Siogkas PK; Lakkas LS; Katsouras CS; Fotiadis DI; Michalis LK Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2017 Nov; 15(11):863-877. PubMed ID: 28902523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Virtual Functional Assessment of Coronary Stenoses Using Intravascular Ultrasound Imaging: A Proof-of-Concept Pilot Study. Siogkas PK; Papafaklis MI; Lakkas L; Exarchos TP; Karmpaliotis D; Ali ZA; Pelosi G; Parodi O; Katsouras CS; Fotiadis DI; Michalis LK Heart Lung Circ; 2019 Apr; 28(4):e33-e36. PubMed ID: 29895487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intravascular ultrasound lumen area parameters for assessment of physiological ischemia by fractional flow reserve in intermediate coronary artery stenosis. Ben-Dor I; Torguson R; Deksissa T; Bui AB; Xue Z; Satler LF; Pichard AD; Waksman R Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2012; 13(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 22336532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]