These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24988298)

  • 1. When religious freedom clashes with access to care.
    Cohen IG; Lynch HF; Curfman GD
    N Engl J Med; 2014 Aug; 371(7):596-9. PubMed ID: 24988298
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Money, sex, and religion--the Supreme Court's ACA sequel.
    Annas GJ; Ruger TW; Ruger JP
    N Engl J Med; 2014 Aug; 371(9):862-6. PubMed ID: 25029337
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Religious freedom and women's health--the litigation on contraception.
    Jost TS
    N Engl J Med; 2013 Jan; 368(1):4-6. PubMed ID: 23252500
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The severability of the individual mandate.
    Sessions SY; Detsky AS
    N Engl J Med; 2012 Mar; 366(13):e19. PubMed ID: 22417202
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contraception at risk.
    The Editors
    N Engl J Med; 2014 Jan; 370(1):77-8. PubMed ID: 24328442
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ruthless Health Law.
    Charo RA
    N Engl J Med; 2020 Nov; 383(21):e115. PubMed ID: 32997904
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The health of healthcare, Part IV: Standing before the court.
    Waldman D
    J Med Pract Manage; 2014; 29(5):320-2. PubMed ID: 24877210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. US court will hear religious challenge to health law's contraceptive mandate.
    McCarthy M
    BMJ; 2014 Mar; 348():g2336. PubMed ID: 24665143
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Abortion 1990s: contemporary issues and the activist court.
    Bertz RC
    West State Univ Law Rev; 1992; 19(2):393-429. PubMed ID: 16047452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Substantial Shifts in Supreme Court Health Law Jurisprudence.
    Gostin LO; Hodge JG
    JAMA; 2018 Oct; 320(14):1431-1432. PubMed ID: 30193377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Supreme Court review of the health care reform law.
    Curfman GD; Abel BS; Landers RM
    N Engl J Med; 2012 Mar; 366(11):977-9. PubMed ID: 22375936
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The 'sleeper' issues before the Supreme Court as it reviews the Affordable Care Act.
    Goldman TR
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2012 Mar; 31(3):471-4. PubMed ID: 22392656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Supreme Court arguments on the ACA--a clash of two world views.
    Hall MA
    N Engl J Med; 2012 Apr; 366(16):1462-3. PubMed ID: 22475540
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius: the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
    Harv Law Rev; 2012 Nov; 126(1):72-82. PubMed ID: 25330555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Health reform and the Supreme Court: the ACA survives the battle of the broccoli and fortifies itself against future fatal attack.
    Ouellette A
    Albany Law Rev; 2012-2013; 76(1):87-119. PubMed ID: 23577375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reframing federalism--the Affordable Care Act (and broccoli) in the Supreme Court.
    Mariner WK; Glantz LH; Annas GJ
    N Engl J Med; 2012 Sep; 367(12):1154-8. PubMed ID: 22809363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Supreme Court decision in the Hobby Lobby Case: conscience, complicity, and contraception.
    Charo RA
    JAMA Intern Med; 2014 Oct; 174(10):1537-8. PubMed ID: 25024087
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Judicial diagnosis 'conscience' vs. care how refusal clauses are reshaping the rights revolution.
    Appel JM
    Med Health R I; 2005 Aug; 88(8):279-81. PubMed ID: 16273974
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The religious exemption to mandated insurance coverage of contraception.
    Sonfield A
    Virtual Mentor; 2012 Feb; 14(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 23116956
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Path set for ACA? Proponents, foes of law appeal to Supreme Court.
    Carlson J
    Mod Healthc; 2011 Oct; 41(40):12. PubMed ID: 22049853
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.