These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24988512)

  • 1. Reliability and validity of a Turkish language version of the Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool.
    Karahan A; Toruner EK; Ceylan A; Abbasoglu A; Tekindal A; Buyukgonenc L
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2014; 41(4):340-4. PubMed ID: 24988512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Staging and defining characteristics of pressure ulcers using photographs by staff nurses in acute care settings.
    Jesada EC; Warren JI; Goodman D; Iliuta RW; Thurkauf G; McLaughlin MK; Johnson JE; Strassner L
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2013; 40(2):150-6. PubMed ID: 23466719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predictive validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the risk assessment pressure sore scale in intensive care patients: results of a prospective study.
    Günes ÜY; Efteli E
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2015 Apr; 61(4):58-62. PubMed ID: 25853378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of DESIGN-R, an assessment instrument for pressure ulcers .
    Zhong X; Nagase T; Huang L; Kaitani T; Iizaka S; Yamamoto Y; Kanazawa T; Sanada H
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2013 Feb; 59(2):36-43. PubMed ID: 23388396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validity and reliability of a Turkish version of the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale.
    Dedeli O; Fadiloglu C; Bor S
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2009; 36(5):532-8. PubMed ID: 19752664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of Health Belief Model Scale in diabetic patients.
    Kartal A; Ozsoy SA
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2007 Nov; 44(8):1447-58. PubMed ID: 17655849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the pressure ulcer prevention knowledge assessment instrument.
    Tulek Z; Polat C; Ozkan I; Theofanidis D; Togrol RE
    J Tissue Viability; 2016 Nov; 25(4):201-208. PubMed ID: 27671870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bates-Jensen wound assessment tool: pictorial guide validation project.
    Harris C; Bates-Jensen B; Parslow N; Raizman R; Singh M; Ketchen R
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2010; 37(3):253-9. PubMed ID: 20386331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability of the Bates-Jensen wound assessment tool for pressure injury assessment: The pressure ulcer detection study.
    Bates-Jensen BM; McCreath HE; Harputlu D; Patlan A
    Wound Repair Regen; 2019 Jul; 27(4):386-395. PubMed ID: 30828890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pressure ulcer risk assessment in critical care: interrater reliability and validity studies of the Braden and Waterlow scales and subjective ratings in two intensive care units.
    Kottner J; Dassen T
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2010 Jun; 47(6):671-7. PubMed ID: 20003975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of The Pressure Injury Prevention Knowledge Questionnaire(PIPK).
    Bahar A; Özgürbüz NE
    J Tissue Viability; 2022 Feb; 31(1):30-37. PubMed ID: 34801351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validation and Clinical Experience With a Turkish Language Version of the Pittman Ostomy Complication and Severity Index.
    Sayar S; Vural F
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2020; 47(1):45-49. PubMed ID: 31800567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The attitude towards Medical Device-Related Pressure Injuries Questionnaire: a Turkish validity and reliability study.
    Küçükkelepçe GE; Karaca T; Özkan SA
    Wound Manag Prev; 2023 Nov; 69(4):10-17. PubMed ID: 38090951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Neonatal Skin Risk Assessment Scale.
    Sari Ç; Altay N
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2017 Mar; 30(3):131-136. PubMed ID: 28198744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Maternal Antenatal Attachment Scale.
    Golbasi Z; Ucar T; Tugut N
    Jpn J Nurs Sci; 2015 Apr; 12(2):154-61. PubMed ID: 24962076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of pressure ulcer knowledge assessment tool-updated version (PUKAT 2.0).
    Dalli ÖE; Yildirim Y; Çalişkan G; Girgin NK
    J Tissue Viability; 2022 Feb; 31(1):52-57. PubMed ID: 34429220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The validity and reliability of the Pressure Ulcer Quality of Life instrument: A methodological study.
    Gül Ş; Avşar P; Karadağ A; Karaçay P; Gökmen D
    J Tissue Viability; 2023 Feb; 32(1):102-106. PubMed ID: 36535811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing the Validity and Reliability of the Peristomal Skin Lesion Assessment Instrument Adapted for Use in Turkey.
    Ay A; Bulut H
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2015 Aug; 61(8):26-34. PubMed ID: 26291898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire for patients with head and neck cancer.
    Senkal HA; Hayran M; Karakaya E; Yueh B; Weymuller EA; Hoşal AŞ
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2012; 33(4):417-26. PubMed ID: 22137146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validity and Reliability of the Pieper-Zulkowski Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Test for Use in Turkey.
    Yeşil M; Toygar İ; Aslan FE
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2024 Mar; 37(3):1-5. PubMed ID: 38393708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.