These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24988734)

  • 1. "No touch" digital restorations.
    Ehrlich T
    Todays FDA; 2014; 26(3):52-3. PubMed ID: 24988734
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of selective open architecture in digital restoration fabrication.
    Schroder BK; Brown C
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2010; 31 Spec No 4():15-22. PubMed ID: 21049825
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Digital impressions for the fabrication of aesthetic ceramic restorations: a case report.
    Glassman S
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2009; 21(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 19456058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digital dentistry: innovation for restorative treatment.
    Fasbinder DJ
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2010; 31 Spec No 4():2-11; quiz 12. PubMed ID: 21049823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cerec standard 3-d occlusal contouring in comparison with the new biogeneric occlusal morphing: a case report.
    Reiss B
    Int J Comput Dent; 2007 Jan; 10(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 17455770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Noninvasive restoration of severe erosion by means of CAD/CAM indirect composite occlusal restorations: a technical note.
    Schepke U; Cune MS
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(2):134-6. PubMed ID: 24596909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Versatile CAD/CAM digital impression technology.
    Agarwal T; Silverman L; Morgan A
    Dent Today; 2010 Mar; 29(3):110, 112-5. PubMed ID: 20333860
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improving the efficiency of intraoral scanning.
    Liu W; Huang GJ
    J Clin Orthod; 2014 Sep; 48(9):549-54. PubMed ID: 25329628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Manual correlation.
    Müller H
    Int J Comput Dent; 2005 Apr; 8(2):155-9. PubMed ID: 16201398
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The evolution of digital dentistry and the digital dental team.
    McLaren EA; Culp L; White S
    Dent Today; 2008 Sep; 27(9):112, 114, 116-7. PubMed ID: 18807959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Functionally-generated pathway theory, application and development in Cerec restorations.
    Jedynakiewicz NM; Martin N
    Int J Comput Dent; 2001 Jan; 4(1):25-36. PubMed ID: 11441563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dimensional accuracy of optical bite registration in single and multiple unit restorations.
    Iwaki Y; Wakabayashi N; Igarashi Y
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(3):309-15. PubMed ID: 23092147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. FGP technique with Cerec 3D.
    Müller H
    Int J Comput Dent; 2006 Oct; 9(4):333-8. PubMed ID: 17343247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Strategies for integrating new restorative materials with digital technology and sound restorative principles.
    Roberts M
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2013 Jan; 34(1):52-7, 59. PubMed ID: 23550332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Chairside multi-unit restoration of a quadrant using the new Cerec 3D software.
    Ender A; Wiedhahn K; Mörmann WH
    Int J Comput Dent; 2003 Jan; 6(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 12838593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cerec 3D--a new dimension in treatment.
    Schneider W
    Int J Comput Dent; 2003 Jan; 6(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 12838589
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impression-free/model-free anterior fixed partial denture: a novel CAD/CAM approach.
    Helvey G
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2009; 21(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 19583169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Decoding CAD/CAM and digital impression units.
    Schoenbaum TR
    Dent Today; 2010 Feb; 29(2):140, 142, 144-5. PubMed ID: 20196346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bite registration in Cerec and in lab.
    Frank E; Frank S
    Int J Comput Dent; 2012; 15(2):149-58. PubMed ID: 22891418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Benefits of the dual-arch impression technique. Accurate impressions and fewer than 1% remakes.
    Abrams SH
    Dent Today; 2002 Jul; 21(7):56-9. PubMed ID: 12242834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.