BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

861 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24989387)

  • 1. Assessment of volumetric noise and resolution performance for linear and nonlinear CT reconstruction methods.
    Chen B; Christianson O; Wilson JM; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 41(7):071909. PubMed ID: 24989387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating iterative reconstruction performance in computed tomography.
    Chen B; Ramirez Giraldo JC; Solomon J; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2014 Dec; 41(12):121913. PubMed ID: 25471973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Noise and spatial resolution properties of a commercially available deep learning-based CT reconstruction algorithm.
    Solomon J; Lyu P; Marin D; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2020 Sep; 47(9):3961-3971. PubMed ID: 32506661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantum noise properties of CT images with anatomical textured backgrounds across reconstruction algorithms: FBP and SAFIRE.
    Solomon J; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):091908. PubMed ID: 25186395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of the dose reduction potential of a model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm using a task-based performance metrology.
    Samei E; Richard S
    Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 42(1):314-23. PubMed ID: 25563271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Characteristic image quality of a third generation dual-source MDCT scanner: Noise, resolution, and detectability.
    Solomon J; Wilson J; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4941-53. PubMed ID: 26233220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spatial resolution improvement and dose reduction potential for inner ear CT imaging using a z-axis deconvolution technique.
    McCollough CH; Leng S; Sunnegardh J; Vrieze TJ; Yu L; Lane J; Raupach R; Stierstorfer K; Flohr T
    Med Phys; 2013 Jun; 40(6):061904. PubMed ID: 23718595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development, validation, and relevance of in vivo low-contrast task transfer function to estimate detectability in clinical CT images.
    Smith TB; Abadi E; Solomon J; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2021 Dec; 48(12):7698-7711. PubMed ID: 34713908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Alpha image reconstruction (AIR): a new iterative CT image reconstruction approach using voxel-wise alpha blending.
    Hofmann C; Sawall S; Knaup M; Kachelrieß M
    Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):061914. PubMed ID: 24877825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characterization of a commercial hybrid iterative and model-based reconstruction algorithm in radiation oncology.
    Price RG; Vance S; Cattaneo R; Schultz L; Elshaikh MA; Chetty IJ; Glide-Hurst CK
    Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081907. PubMed ID: 25086538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A methodology for image quality evaluation of advanced CT systems.
    Wilson JM; Christianson OI; Richard S; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2013 Mar; 40(3):031908. PubMed ID: 23464323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Towards task-based assessment of CT performance: system and object MTF across different reconstruction algorithms.
    Richard S; Husarik DB; Yadava G; Murphy SN; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4115-22. PubMed ID: 22830744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparative study based on image quality and clinical task performance for CT reconstruction algorithms in radiotherapy.
    Li H; Dolly S; Chen HC; Anastasio MA; Low DA; Li HH; Michalski JM; Thorstad WL; Gay H; Mutic S
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):377-390. PubMed ID: 27455472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Volumetric quantification of lung nodules in CT with iterative reconstruction (ASiR and MBIR).
    Chen B; Barnhart H; Richard S; Robins M; Colsher J; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111902. PubMed ID: 24320435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Statistical model based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) in clinical CT systems. Part II. Experimental assessment of spatial resolution performance.
    Li K; Garrett J; Ge Y; Chen GH
    Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 41(7):071911. PubMed ID: 24989389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality evaluation of image-based iterative reconstruction for CT: Comparison with hybrid iterative reconstruction.
    Kawashima H; Ichikawa K; Matsubara K; Nagata H; Takata T; Kobayashi S
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jun; 20(6):199-205. PubMed ID: 31050148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of low-contrast detectability between two CT reconstruction algorithms using voxel-based 3D printed textured phantoms.
    Solomon J; Ba A; Bochud F; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2016 Dec; 43(12):6497. PubMed ID: 27908164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. CT head-scan dosimetry in an anthropomorphic phantom and associated measurement of ACR accreditation-phantom imaging metrics under clinically representative scan conditions.
    Brunner CC; Stern SH; Minniti R; Parry MI; Skopec M; Chakrabarti K
    Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081917. PubMed ID: 23927331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A systematic task-based image quality assessment of photon-counting and energy integrating CT as a function of reconstruction kernel and phantom size.
    Bhattarai M; Bache S; Abadi E; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2024 Feb; 51(2):1047-1060. PubMed ID: 37469179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Image quality evaluation in deep-learning-based CT noise reduction using virtual imaging trial methods: Contrast-dependent spatial resolution.
    Zhou Z; Gong H; Hsieh S; McCollough CH; Yu L
    Med Phys; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38555876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 44.