860 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24989387)
41. Stenosis quantification in coronary CT angiography: impact of an integrated circuit detector with iterative reconstruction.
Morsbach F; Desbiolles L; Plass A; Leschka S; Schmidt B; Falk V; Alkadhi H; Stolzmann P
Invest Radiol; 2013 Jan; 48(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 23192163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Noise-resolution tradeoffs in x-ray CT imaging: a comparison of penalized alternating minimization and filtered backprojection algorithms.
Evans JD; Politte DG; Whiting BR; O'Sullivan JA; Williamson JF
Med Phys; 2011 Mar; 38(3):1444-58. PubMed ID: 21520856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. A three-dimensional-weighted cone beam filtered backprojection (CB-FBP) algorithm for image reconstruction in volumetric CT-helical scanning.
Tang X; Hsieh J; Nilsen RA; Dutta S; Samsonov D; Hagiwara A
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Feb; 51(4):855-74. PubMed ID: 16467583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Assessing image quality and dose reduction of a new x-ray computed tomography iterative reconstruction algorithm using model observers.
Tseng HW; Fan J; Kupinski MA; Sainath P; Hsieh J
Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 41(7):071910. PubMed ID: 24989388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Performance of a deep learning-based CT image denoising method: Generalizability over dose, reconstruction kernel, and slice thickness.
Zeng R; Lin CY; Li Q; Jiang L; Skopec M; Fessler JA; Myers KJ
Med Phys; 2022 Feb; 49(2):836-853. PubMed ID: 34954845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D versus filtered back projection in CT: evaluation of image quality.
Joemai RM; Veldkamp WJ; Kroft LJ; Hernandez-Giron I; Geleijns J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Dec; 201(6):1291-7. PubMed ID: 24261369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Characterization of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm for dose reduction in CT: A pediatric oncology perspective.
Brady SL; Yee BS; Kaufman RA
Med Phys; 2012 Sep; 39(9):5520-31. PubMed ID: 22957619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. A method for characterizing and matching CT image quality across CT scanners from different manufacturers.
Winslow J; Zhang Y; Samei E
Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 44(11):5705-5717. PubMed ID: 28865170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. A general framework of noise suppression in material decomposition for dual-energy CT.
Petrongolo M; Dong X; Zhu L
Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4848-62. PubMed ID: 26233212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Performance evaluation of a micro-CT system for laboratory animal imaging with iterative reconstruction capabilities.
Muller FM; Vanhove C; Vandeghinste B; Vandenberghe S
Med Phys; 2022 May; 49(5):3121-3133. PubMed ID: 35170057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Statistical model based iterative reconstruction in clinical CT systems. Part III. Task-based kV/mAs optimization for radiation dose reduction.
Li K; Gomez-Cardona D; Hsieh J; Lubner MG; Pickhardt PJ; Chen GH
Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 42(9):5209-21. PubMed ID: 26328971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Combined iterative reconstruction and image-domain decomposition for dual energy CT using total-variation regularization.
Dong X; Niu T; Zhu L
Med Phys; 2014 May; 41(5):051909. PubMed ID: 24784388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Ultra-low peak voltage CT colonography: effect of iterative reconstruction algorithms on performance of radiologists who use anthropomorphic colonic phantoms.
Shin CI; Kim SH; Lee ES; Lee DH; Hwang EJ; Chung SY; Lee JM; Han JK; Choi BI
Radiology; 2014 Dec; 273(3):759-71. PubMed ID: 25010640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Determining the radiation dose reduction potential for coronary calcium scanning with computed tomography: an anthropomorphic phantom study comparing filtered backprojection and the adaptive iterative dose reduction algorithm for image reconstruction.
Blobel J; Mews J; Schuijf JD; Overlaet W
Invest Radiol; 2013 Dec; 48(12):857-62. PubMed ID: 23917328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Can sinogram-affirmed iterative (SAFIRE) reconstruction improve imaging quality on low-dose lung CT screening compared with traditional filtered back projection (FBP) reconstruction?
Yang WJ; Yan FH; Liu B; Pang LF; Hou L; Zhang H; Pan ZL; Chen KM
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(2):301-5. PubMed ID: 23493224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Influence of radiation dose and iterative reconstruction algorithms for measurement accuracy and reproducibility of pulmonary nodule volumetry: A phantom study.
Kim H; Park CM; Song YS; Lee SM; Goo JM
Eur J Radiol; 2014 May; 83(5):848-57. PubMed ID: 24572380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Evaluation of the spline reconstruction technique for PET.
Kastis GA; Kyriakopoulou D; Gaitanis A; Fernández Y; Hutton BF; Fokas AS
Med Phys; 2014 Apr; 41(4):042501. PubMed ID: 24694154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Low dose dynamic CT myocardial perfusion imaging using a statistical iterative reconstruction method.
Tao Y; Chen GH; Hacker TA; Raval AN; Van Lysel MS; Speidel MA
Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 41(7):071914. PubMed ID: 24989392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Hybrid iterative reconstruction algorithm in brain CT: a radiation dose reduction and image quality assessment study.
Löve A; Siemund R; Höglund P; Van Westen D; Stenberg L; Petersen C; Björkman-Burtscher IM
Acta Radiol; 2014 Mar; 55(2):208-17. PubMed ID: 23897306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. CT automated exposure control using a generalized detectability index.
Khobragade P; Rupcich F; Fan J; Crotty DJ; Kulkarni NM; O'Connor SD; Foley WD; Schmidt TG
Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 46(1):140-151. PubMed ID: 30417403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
