216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24989389)
1. Statistical model based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) in clinical CT systems. Part II. Experimental assessment of spatial resolution performance.
Li K; Garrett J; Ge Y; Chen GH
Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 41(7):071911. PubMed ID: 24989389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Statistical model based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) in clinical CT systems: experimental assessment of noise performance.
Li K; Tang J; Chen GH
Med Phys; 2014 Apr; 41(4):041906. PubMed ID: 24694137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of the dose reduction potential of a model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm using a task-based performance metrology.
Samei E; Richard S
Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 42(1):314-23. PubMed ID: 25563271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance evaluation of iterative reconstruction algorithms for achieving CT radiation dose reduction - a phantom study.
Dodge CT; Tamm EP; Cody DD; Liu X; Jensen CT; Wei W; Kundra V; Rong XJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 17(2):511-531. PubMed ID: 27074454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Statistical model based iterative reconstruction in clinical CT systems. Part III. Task-based kV/mAs optimization for radiation dose reduction.
Li K; Gomez-Cardona D; Hsieh J; Lubner MG; Pickhardt PJ; Chen GH
Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 42(9):5209-21. PubMed ID: 26328971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dose reduction in CT urography and vasculature phantom studies using model-based iterative reconstruction.
Page L; Wei W; Kundra V; Rong XJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 17(6):334-342. PubMed ID: 27929506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. CT of the chest with model-based, fully iterative reconstruction: comparison with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.
Ichikawa Y; Kitagawa K; Nagasawa N; Murashima S; Sakuma H
BMC Med Imaging; 2013 Aug; 13():27. PubMed ID: 23927627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Objective assessment of low contrast detectability in computed tomography with Channelized Hotelling Observer.
Racine D; Ba AH; Ott JG; Bochud FO; Verdun FR
Phys Med; 2016 Jan; 32(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 26515665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A phantom study of the performance of model-based iterative reconstruction in low-dose chest and abdominal CT: When are benefits maximized?
Moloney F; Twomey M; James K; Kavanagh RG; Fama D; O'Neill S; Grey TM; Moore N; Murphy MJ; O'Connor OJ; Maher MM
Radiography (Lond); 2018 Nov; 24(4):345-351. PubMed ID: 30292504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction (MBIR) in reduced-dose CT for routine follow-up of patients with malignant lymphoma: dose savings, image quality and phantom study.
Hérin E; Gardavaud F; Chiaradia M; Beaussart P; Richard P; Cavet M; Deux JF; Haioun C; Itti E; Rahmouni A; Luciani A
Eur Radiol; 2015 Aug; 25(8):2362-70. PubMed ID: 25749813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Can conclusions drawn from phantom-based image noise assessments be generalized to in vivo studies for the nonlinear model-based iterative reconstruction method?
Gomez-Cardona D; Li K; Hsieh J; Lubner MG; Pickhardt PJ; Chen GH
Med Phys; 2016 Feb; 43(2):687-95. PubMed ID: 26843232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Third-Generation Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction Technique: Phantom Study of Image Noise, Spatial Resolution, Lesion Detectability, and Dose Reduction Potential.
Euler A; Solomon J; Marin D; Nelson RC; Samei E
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jun; 210(6):1301-1308. PubMed ID: 29702019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating iterative reconstruction performance in computed tomography.
Chen B; Ramirez Giraldo JC; Solomon J; Samei E
Med Phys; 2014 Dec; 41(12):121913. PubMed ID: 25471973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Standard and reduced radiation dose liver CT images: adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction versus model-based iterative reconstruction-comparison of findings and image quality.
Shuman WP; Chan KT; Busey JM; Mitsumori LM; Choi E; Koprowicz KM; Kanal KM
Radiology; 2014 Dec; 273(3):793-800. PubMed ID: 25170546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of pure and hybrid iterative reconstruction algorithms on high-resolution computed tomography in the evaluation of interstitial lung disease.
Katsura M; Sato J; Akahane M; Mise Y; Sumida K; Abe O
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Aug; 93():243-251. PubMed ID: 28668422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Towards task-based assessment of CT performance: system and object MTF across different reconstruction algorithms.
Richard S; Husarik DB; Yadava G; Murphy SN; Samei E
Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4115-22. PubMed ID: 22830744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Noise and spatial resolution properties of a commercially available deep learning-based CT reconstruction algorithm.
Solomon J; Lyu P; Marin D; Samei E
Med Phys; 2020 Sep; 47(9):3961-3971. PubMed ID: 32506661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of a model-based, iterative reconstruction algorithm (MBIR) regarding image quality and dose reduction in liver computed tomography.
Chang W; Lee JM; Lee K; Yoon JH; Yu MH; Han JK; Choi BI
Invest Radiol; 2013 Aug; 48(8):598-606. PubMed ID: 23511193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computational and human observer image quality evaluation of low dose, knowledge-based CT iterative reconstruction.
Eck BL; Fahmi R; Brown KM; Zabic S; Raihani N; Miao J; Wilson DL
Med Phys; 2015 Oct; 42(10):6098-111. PubMed ID: 26429285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Full model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) in abdominal CT increases objective image quality, but decreases subjective acceptance.
Laurent G; Villani N; Hossu G; Rauch A; Noël A; Blum A; Gondim Teixeira PA
Eur Radiol; 2019 Aug; 29(8):4016-4025. PubMed ID: 30701327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
