These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24989633)
1. Is assessment of anti-Müllerian hormone and/or antral follicle count useful in the prediction of ovarian response in expected normal responders treated with a fixed dose of recombinant FSH and GnRH antagonists? A prospective observational study. Ganidou MA; Kolibianakis EM; Venetis CA; Gerou S; Makedos GA; Klearchou N; Tarlatzis BC Gynecol Endocrinol; 2014 Nov; 30(11):817-21. PubMed ID: 24989633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Anti-Müllerian hormone versus antral follicle count for defining the starting dose of FSH. Lan VT; Linh NK; Tuong HM; Wong PC; Howles CM Reprod Biomed Online; 2013 Oct; 27(4):390-9. PubMed ID: 23953069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predictive value of anti-müllerian hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone and antral follicle count on the outcome of ovarian stimulation in women following GnRH-antagonist protocol for IVF/ET. Tsakos E; Tolikas A; Daniilidis A; Asimakopoulos B Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Dec; 290(6):1249-53. PubMed ID: 25001569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predictive factors of ovarian response and clinical outcome after IVF/ICSI following a rFSH/GnRH antagonist protocol with or without oral contraceptive pre-treatment. Andersen AN; Witjes H; Gordon K; Mannaerts B; Hum Reprod; 2011 Dec; 26(12):3413-23. PubMed ID: 21954280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Circulating basal anti-Müllerian hormone levels as predictor of ovarian response in women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization. Nardo LG; Gelbaya TA; Wilkinson H; Roberts SA; Yates A; Pemberton P; Laing I Fertil Steril; 2009 Nov; 92(5):1586-93. PubMed ID: 18930213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The addition of anti-Müllerian hormone in an algorithm for individualized hormone dosage did not improve the prediction of ovarian response-a randomized, controlled trial. Magnusson Å; Nilsson L; Oleröd G; Thurin-Kjellberg A; Bergh C Hum Reprod; 2017 Apr; 32(4):811-819. PubMed ID: 28175316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is AMH useful to reduce low ovarian response to GnRH antagonist protocol in oocyte donors? Martínez F; Clua E; Carreras O; Tur R; Rodríguez I; Barri PN Gynecol Endocrinol; 2013 Aug; 29(8):754-7. PubMed ID: 23758138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Antimüllerian hormone in gonadotropin releasing-hormone antagonist cycles: prediction of ovarian response and cumulative treatment outcome in good-prognosis patients. Arce JC; La Marca A; Mirner Klein B; Nyboe Andersen A; Fleming R Fertil Steril; 2013 May; 99(6):1644-53. PubMed ID: 23394782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predictive markers for the FSH sensitivity of women with polycystic ovarian syndrome. Köninger A; Sauter L; Edimiris P; Kasimir-Bauer S; Kimmig R; Strowitzki T; Schmidt B Hum Reprod; 2014 Mar; 29(3):518-24. PubMed ID: 24419495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Anti-Mullerian Hormone (AMH) levels in serum and follicular fluid as predictors of ovarian response in stimulated (IVF and ICSI) cycles. Tolikas A; Tsakos E; Gerou S; Prapas Y; Loufopoulos A Hum Fertil (Camb); 2011 Dec; 14(4):246-53. PubMed ID: 22088130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does the time interval between antimüllerian hormone serum sampling and initiation of ovarian stimulation affect its predictive ability in in vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist? A retrospective single-center study. Polyzos NP; Nelson SM; Stoop D; Nwoye M; Humaidan P; Anckaert E; Devroey P; Tournaye H Fertil Steril; 2013 Aug; 100(2):438-44. PubMed ID: 23602319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What is the value of anti-Müllerian hormone in predicting the response to ovarian stimulation with GnRH agonist and antagonist protocols? Knez J; Kovačič B; Medved M; Vlaisavljević V Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2015 Jun; 13():58. PubMed ID: 26059906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Estimation of ovarian response using multiple predictors of ovarian reserve in women undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer]. He Y; Xia R; Chen X; Ye D; Tang Y; Li P; Niu J; Chen S Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2013 Feb; 33(2):216-20. PubMed ID: 23443775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of antral follicle count and serum anti Müllerian hormone level for determination of gonadotropin dosing in in-vitro fertilization: randomized trial. Li HWR; Ko JKY; Lee VCY; Yung SSF; Lau EYL; Yeung WSB; Ho PC; Ng EHY Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Mar; 55(3):303-309. PubMed ID: 31325336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predictive factors for ovarian response in a corifollitropin alfa/GnRH antagonist protocol for controlled ovarian stimulation in IVF/ICSI cycles. Oehninger S; Nelson SM; Verweij P; Stegmann BJ Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2015 Oct; 13():117. PubMed ID: 26520396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of antimüllerian hormone levels and antral follicle count as predictor of ovarian response to controlled ovarian stimulation in good-prognosis patients at individual fertility clinics in two multicenter trials. Nelson SM; Klein BM; Arce JC Fertil Steril; 2015 Apr; 103(4):923-930.e1. PubMed ID: 25624196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Antral follicle count, anti-mullerian hormone and inhibin B: predictors of ovarian response in assisted reproductive technology? Muttukrishna S; McGarrigle H; Wakim R; Khadum I; Ranieri DM; Serhal P BJOG; 2005 Oct; 112(10):1384-90. PubMed ID: 16167941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of anti-Müllerian hormone as a test for the prediction of ovarian reserve. Kwee J; Schats R; McDonnell J; Themmen A; de Jong F; Lambalk C Fertil Steril; 2008 Sep; 90(3):737-43. PubMed ID: 17923131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Antral follicle count determines poor ovarian response better than anti-Müllerian hormone but age is the only predictor for live birth in in vitro fertilization cycles. Mutlu MF; Erdem M; Erdem A; Yildiz S; Mutlu I; Arisoy O; Oktem M J Assist Reprod Genet; 2013 Jun; 30(5):657-65. PubMed ID: 23508679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]