These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24989869)

  • 1. How we give personalised audio feedback after summative OSCEs.
    Harrison CJ; Molyneux AJ; Blackwell S; Wass VJ
    Med Teach; 2015 Apr; 37(4):323-6. PubMed ID: 24989869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of a multi-methods approach to the collection and dissemination of feedback on OSCE performance in dental education.
    Wardman MJ; Yorke VC; Hallam JL
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2018 May; 22(2):e203-e211. PubMed ID: 28524327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of outcomes of a formative objective structured clinical examination for second-year UK medical students.
    Chisnall B; Vince T; Hall S; Tribe R
    Int J Med Educ; 2015 Jun; 6():76-83. PubMed ID: 26094249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do clinical clerks provide candidates with adequate formative assessment during Objective Structured Clinical Examinations?
    Reiter HI; Rosenfeld J; Nandagopal K; Eva KW
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2004; 9(3):189-99. PubMed ID: 15316270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Feedback after OSCE: A comparison of face to face versus an enhanced written feedback.
    Ngim CF; Fullerton PD; Ratnasingam V; Arasoo VJT; Dominic NA; Niap CPS; Thurairajasingam S
    BMC Med Educ; 2021 Mar; 21(1):180. PubMed ID: 33761946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Implementation of written structured feedback into a surgical OSCE.
    Sterz J; Linßen S; Stefanescu MC; Schreckenbach T; Seifert LB; Ruesseler M
    BMC Med Educ; 2021 Apr; 21(1):192. PubMed ID: 33823844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The one minute mentor: a pilot study assessing medical students' and residents' professional behaviours through recordings of clinical preceptors' immediate feedback.
    Topps D; Evans RJ; Thistlethwaite JE; Nan Tie R; Ellaway RH
    Educ Health (Abingdon); 2009 May; 22(1):189. PubMed ID: 19953438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors shaping e-feedback utilization following electronic Objective Structured Clinical Examinations.
    Ashby SE; Snodgrass SH; Rivett DA; Russell T
    Nurs Health Sci; 2016 Sep; 18(3):362-9. PubMed ID: 27029015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can standardized patients replace physicians as OSCE examiners?
    McLaughlin K; Gregor L; Jones A; Coderre S
    BMC Med Educ; 2006 Feb; 6():12. PubMed ID: 16504145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The benefits of a peer-assisted mock OSCE.
    Young I; Montgomery K; Kearns P; Hayward S; Mellanby E
    Clin Teach; 2014 Jun; 11(3):214-8. PubMed ID: 24802924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Medical students' perception of objective structured clinical examination: a feedback for process improvement.
    Nasir AA; Yusuf AS; Abdur-Rahman LO; Babalola OM; Adeyeye AA; Popoola AA; Adeniran JO
    J Surg Educ; 2014; 71(5):701-6. PubMed ID: 25012605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Back to the future: An online OSCE Management Information System for nursing OSCEs.
    Meskell P; Burke E; Kropmans TJ; Byrne E; Setyonugroho W; Kennedy KM
    Nurse Educ Today; 2015 Nov; 35(11):1091-6. PubMed ID: 26148444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The value of best-practice guidelines for OSCEs in a postgraduate program in an Australian remote area setting.
    Jeffrey CA; Mitchell ML; Henderson A; Lenthall S; Knight S; Glover P; Kelly M; Nulty D; Groves M
    Rural Remote Health; 2014; 14(3):2469. PubMed ID: 25064043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A digital resource to assess clinical competency.
    Cham KM; Cochrane AL
    Clin Teach; 2020 Apr; 17(2):153-158. PubMed ID: 31144437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Formative assessment of practical skills with peer-assessors: quality features of an OSCE in general medicine at the Heidelberg Medical Faculty.
    Möltner A; Lehmann M; Wachter C; Kurczyk S; Schwill S; Loukanova S
    GMS J Med Educ; 2020; 37(4):Doc42. PubMed ID: 32685670
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electronic acquisition of OSCE performance using tablets.
    Hochlehnert A; Schultz JH; Möltner A; Tımbıl S; Brass K; Jünger J
    GMS Z Med Ausbild; 2015; 32(4):Doc41. PubMed ID: 26483854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Engaging clinical examiners with structured feedback to enhance assessment practices.
    Wong WYA; Moni K; Roberts C; Thistlethwaite J
    Med Teach; 2022 Aug; 44(8):914-921. PubMed ID: 35343380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of tablet-scoring and immediate score sheet review on validity and educational impact in an internal medicine residency Objective Structured Clinical Exam (OSCE).
    Daniels VJ; Strand AC; Lai H; Hillier T
    Med Teach; 2019 Sep; 41(9):1039-1044. PubMed ID: 31131661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The objective structured clinical examination: can physician-examiners participate from a distance?
    Chan J; Humphrey-Murto S; Pugh DM; Su C; Wood T
    Med Educ; 2014 Apr; 48(4):441-50. PubMed ID: 24606627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Formative feedback from the first-person perspective using Google Glass in a family medicine objective structured clinical examination station in the United States.
    Youm J; Wiechmann W
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2018; 15():5. PubMed ID: 29510601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.