These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24990005)
1. Can stroke survivors with severe upper arm disability achieve a clinically important change in arm function during inpatient rehabilitation? A multicentre, prospective, observational study. Hayward KS; Kuys SS; Barker RN; Brauer SG NeuroRehabilitation; 2014; 35(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 24990005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinically important improvements in motor function are achievable during inpatient rehabilitation by stroke patients with severe motor disability: a prospective observational study. Hayward KS; Kuys SS; Barker RN; Brauer SG NeuroRehabilitation; 2014; 34(4):773-9. PubMed ID: 24796436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. SMART Arm Training With Outcome-Triggered Electrical Stimulation in Subacute Stroke Survivors With Severe Arm Disability: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Barker RN; Hayward KS; Carson RG; Lloyd D; Brauer SG Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2017 Dec; 31(12):1005-1016. PubMed ID: 29199503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. General cognition predicts post-stroke recovery defined through minimal clinically important difference (MCID): a cohort study in an Italian rehabilitation clinic. Ginex V; Vanacore N; Lacorte E; Sozzi M; Pisani L; Corbo M; Clerici F Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2015 Oct; 51(5):597-606. PubMed ID: 25375185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Activity limitations experienced by people with stroke who receive inpatient rehabilitation: differences between 2001, 2005, and 2011. Kuys SS; Bew PG; Lynch MR; Brauer SG Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2014 Apr; 95(4):741-6. PubMed ID: 24365092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Training of reaching in stroke survivors with severe and chronic upper limb paresis using a novel nonrobotic device: a randomized clinical trial. Barker RN; Brauer SG; Carson RG Stroke; 2008 Jun; 39(6):1800-7. PubMed ID: 18403742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinically Important Difference of the Arm Motor Ability Test in Stroke Survivors. Fulk G; Martin R; Page SJ Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2017 Mar; 31(3):272-279. PubMed ID: 27885163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. GABAergic drug use and global, cognitive, and motor functional outcomes after stroke. Schwitzguébel AJ; Benaïm C; Carda S; Torea Filgueira AM; Frischknecht R; Rapin PA Ann Phys Rehabil Med; 2016 Dec; 59(5-6):320-325. PubMed ID: 27132886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Responsiveness of five measures of arm function in acute stroke rehabilitation. Vratsistas-Curto A; Sherrington C; McCluskey A Clin Rehabil; 2018 Aug; 32(8):1098-1107. PubMed ID: 29843521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inpatient Rehabilitation Care in Alberta: How Much Does Stroke Severity and Timing Matter? Tanlaka E; King-Shier K; Green T; Seneviratne C; Dukelow S Can J Neurol Sci; 2019 Nov; 46(6):691-701. PubMed ID: 31434592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stroke patients after neurological inpatient rehabilitation: a prospective study to determine whether functional status or health-related quality of life predict living at home 2.5 years after discharge. Graessel E; Schmidt R; Schupp W Int J Rehabil Res; 2014 Sep; 37(3):212-9. PubMed ID: 24681770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validity of the stroke rehabilitation assessment of movement scale in acute rehabilitation: a comparison with the functional independence measure and stroke impact scale-16. Ward I; Pivko S; Brooks G; Parkin K PM R; 2011 Nov; 3(11):1013-21. PubMed ID: 22108228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predicting the grade of disabilty 1 year after stroke following rehabilitation. Lin JH; Tsai AY; Lo SK; Chang JJ; Huang MH Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2005 May; 21(5):212-9. PubMed ID: 15960067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Functional recovery of the paretic upper limb after stroke: who regains hand capacity? Houwink A; Nijland RH; Geurts AC; Kwakkel G Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2013 May; 94(5):839-44. PubMed ID: 23201317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimating the minimal clinically important difference of an upper extremity recovery measure in subacute stroke patients. Arya KN; Verma R; Garg RK Top Stroke Rehabil; 2011 Oct; 18 Suppl 1():599-610. PubMed ID: 22120029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Motor impairment as a predictor of functional recovery and guide to rehabilitation treatment after stroke. Shelton FD; Volpe BT; Reding M Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2001; 15(3):229-37. PubMed ID: 11944745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Arm Subscore of Motricity Index to Predict Recovery of Upper Limb Dexterity in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke. Malmut L; Lin C; Srdanovic N; Kocherginsky M; Harvey RL; Prabhakaran S Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2020 Apr; 99(4):300-304. PubMed ID: 31592879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Determination of the minimal clinically important difference in the FIM instrument in patients with stroke. Beninato M; Gill-Body KM; Salles S; Stark PC; Black-Schaffer RM; Stein J Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Jan; 87(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 16401435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prediction of Balance After Inpatient Rehabilitation in Stroke Subjects with Severe Balance Alterations at the Admission. Gath CF; Gianella MG; Bonamico L; Olmos L; Russo MJ J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2021 Apr; 30(4):105627. PubMed ID: 33508725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the action research arm test and the Fugl-Meyer assessment as measures of upper-extremity motor weakness after stroke. Rabadi MH; Rabadi FM Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Jul; 87(7):962-6. PubMed ID: 16813784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]