199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24990679)
1. Harmonic calls and indifferent females: no preference for human consonance in an anuran.
Akre KL; Bernal X; Rand AS; Ryan MJ
Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Aug; 281(1789):20140986. PubMed ID: 24990679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Signal perception in frogs and bats and the evolution of mating signals.
Akre KL; Farris HE; Lea AM; Page RA; Ryan MJ
Science; 2011 Aug; 333(6043):751-2. PubMed ID: 21817052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sexual selection in female perceptual space: how female túngara frogs perceive and respond to complex population variation in acoustic mating signals.
Ryan MJ; Rand AS
Evolution; 2003 Nov; 57(11):2608-18. PubMed ID: 14686535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Categorical perception of a natural, multivariate signal: mating call recognition in túngara frogs.
Baugh AT; Akre KL; Ryan MJ
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2008 Jul; 105(26):8985-8. PubMed ID: 18577592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Female túngara frogs do not experience the continuity illusion.
Baugh AT; Ryan MJ; Bernal XE; Rand AS; Bee MA
Behav Neurosci; 2016 Feb; 130(1):62-74. PubMed ID: 26692450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evolution of calls and auditory tuning in the Physalaemus pustulosus species group.
Wilczynski W; Rand AS; Ryan MJ
Brain Behav Evol; 2001; 58(3):137-51. PubMed ID: 11910171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Task differences confound sex differences in receiver permissiveness in túngara frogs.
Bernal XE; Rand AS; Ryan MJ
Proc Biol Sci; 2009 Apr; 276(1660):1323-9. PubMed ID: 19141428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effects of time, space and spectrum on auditory grouping in túngara frogs.
Farris HE; Rand AS; Ryan MJ
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2005 Dec; 191(12):1173-83. PubMed ID: 16088388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sound Classification and Call Discrimination Are Decoded in Order as Revealed by Event-Related Potential Components in Frogs.
Fang G; Yang P; Xue F; Cui J; Brauth SE; Tang Y
Brain Behav Evol; 2015; 86(3-4):232-45. PubMed ID: 26613526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Perceived Synchrony of Frog Multimodal Signal Components Is Influenced by Content and Order.
Taylor RC; Page RA; Klein BA; Ryan MJ; Hunter KL
Integr Comp Biol; 2017 Oct; 57(4):902-909. PubMed ID: 28582535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The development of sexual behavior in túngara frogs (Physalaemus pustulosus).
Baugh AT; Ryan MJ
J Comp Psychol; 2010 Feb; 124(1):66-80. PubMed ID: 20175598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Acoustic radiation patterns of mating calls of the tungara frog (Physalaemus pustuosus): implications for multiple receivers.
Bernal XE; Page RA; Ryan MJ; Argo TF; Wilson PS
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2757-67. PubMed ID: 19894851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mating vocalizations of female frogs: control and evolutionary mechanisms.
Emerson SB; Boyd SK
Brain Behav Evol; 1999; 53(4):187-97. PubMed ID: 10343085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Generalization in response to mate recognition signals.
Ryan MJ; Rand W; Hurd PL; Phelps SM; Rand AS
Am Nat; 2003 Mar; 161(3):380-94. PubMed ID: 12699219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Risky ripples allow bats and frogs to eavesdrop on a multisensory sexual display.
Halfwerk W; Jones PL; Taylor RC; Ryan MJ; Page RA
Science; 2014 Jan; 343(6169):413-6. PubMed ID: 24458640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The biological significance of acoustic stimuli determines ear preference in the music frog.
Xue F; Fang G; Yang P; Zhao E; Brauth SE; Tang Y
J Exp Biol; 2015 Mar; 218(Pt 5):740-7. PubMed ID: 25740903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Auditory Selectivity for Spectral Contrast in Cortical Neurons and Behavior.
So NLT; Edwards JA; Woolley SMN
J Neurosci; 2020 Jan; 40(5):1015-1027. PubMed ID: 31826944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Right ear advantage for vocal communication in frogs results from both structural asymmetry and attention modulation.
Fang G; Xue F; Yang P; Cui J; Brauth SE; Tang Y
Behav Brain Res; 2014 Jun; 266():77-84. PubMed ID: 24613236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Treatment with arginine vasotocin alters mating calls and decreases call attractiveness in male túngara frogs.
Kime NM; Whitney TK; Ryan MJ; Rand AS; Marler CA
Gen Comp Endocrinol; 2010 Jan; 165(2):221-8. PubMed ID: 19576218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Patterns of mating call preferences in túngara frogs, Physalaemus pustulosus.
Ryan MJ; Bernal XE; Rand AS
J Evol Biol; 2007 Nov; 20(6):2235-47. PubMed ID: 17956386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
