These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24990984)

  • 1. Comparison of Effects of Nonoperative Treatment and Decompression Surgery on Risk of Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Falling: Evaluation with Functional Mobility Tests.
    Lee BH; Kim TH; Park MS; Lim S; Park JO; Kim HS; Kim HJ; Lee HM; Moon SH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Jul; 96(13):e110. PubMed ID: 24990984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spinal sagittal balance status affects postoperative actual falls and quality of life after decompression and fusion in-situ surgery in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Lee BH; Park JO; Kim HS; Suk KS; Lee SY; Lee HM; Yang JH; Moon SH
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2016 Sep; 148():52-9. PubMed ID: 27398622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hand grip strength can predict clinical outcomes and risk of falls after decompression and instrumented posterolateral fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Kwon JW; Lee BH; Lee SB; Sung S; Lee CU; Yang JH; Park MS; Byun J; Lee HM; Moon SH
    Spine J; 2020 Dec; 20(12):1960-1967. PubMed ID: 32622937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of Sagittal Balance on Risk of Falling after Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery Combined with Posterior Surgery.
    Lee BH; Yang JH; Kim HS; Suk KS; Lee HM; Park JO; Moon SH
    Yonsei Med J; 2017 Nov; 58(6):1177-1185. PubMed ID: 29047242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Changes in vitamin D status after surgery in female patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and its clinical significance.
    Kim TH; Yoon JY; Lee BH; Jung HS; Park MS; Park JO; Moon ES; Kim HS; Lee HM; Moon SH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Oct; 37(21):E1326-30. PubMed ID: 22805343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Decompression and nonfusion dynamic stabilization for spinal stenosis with degenerative lumbar scoliosis: Clinical article.
    Lee SE; Jahng TA; Kim HJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Oct; 21(4):585-94. PubMed ID: 25084033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Preoperative Zung Depression Scale predicts outcome after revision lumbar surgery for adjacent segment disease, recurrent stenosis, and pseudarthrosis.
    Adogwa O; Parker SL; Shau DN; Mendenhall SK; Aaronson OS; Cheng JS; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    Spine J; 2012 Mar; 12(3):179-85. PubMed ID: 21937282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Revision lumbar surgery in elderly patients with symptomatic pseudarthrosis, adjacent-segment disease, or same-level recurrent stenosis. Part 1. Two-year outcomes and clinical efficacy: clinical article.
    Adogwa O; Carr RK; Kudyba K; Karikari I; Bagley CA; Gokaslan ZL; Theodore N; Cheng JS
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Feb; 18(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 23231354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after neural decompression and fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: understanding clinical versus statistical significance.
    Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau DN; Adogwa O; Anderson WN; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 May; 16(5):471-8. PubMed ID: 22324801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Back pain improvement after decompression without fusion or stabilization in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and clinically significant preoperative back pain.
    Crawford CH; Glassman SD; Mummaneni PV; Knightly JJ; Asher AL
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Nov; 25(5):596-601. PubMed ID: 27285666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Step treatment strategy of degenerative lumbar scoliosis and spinal stenosis].
    Zhang Z; Ren D; Sun T; Li F; Guan K; Zhao G; Shan J
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Aug; 25(8):951-5. PubMed ID: 21923023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.
    Haro H; Maekawa S; Hamada Y
    Spine J; 2008; 8(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 17433781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Affective disorders influence clinical outcomes after revision lumbar surgery in elderly patients with symptomatic adjacent-segment disease, recurrent stenosis, or pseudarthrosis: clinical article.
    Adogwa O; Verla T; Thompson P; Penumaka A; Kudyba K; Johnson K; Fulchiero E; Miller T; Hoang KB; Cheng J; Bagley CA
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Aug; 21(2):153-9. PubMed ID: 24836659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bilateral versus unilateral interlaminar approach for bilateral decompression in patients with single-level degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a multicenter retrospective study of 175 patients on postoperative pain, functional disability, and patient satisfaction.
    den Boogert HF; Keers JC; Marinus Oterdoom DL; Kuijlen JM
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Sep; 23(3):326-35. PubMed ID: 26091439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Determination of minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after extension of fusion for adjacent-segment disease.
    Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau D; Adogwa O; Cheng JS; Anderson WN; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jan; 16(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 21962034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patient are satisfied one year after decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Paulsen RT; Bouknaitir JB; Fruensgaard S; Carreron L; Andersen M
    Dan Med J; 2016 Nov; 63(11):. PubMed ID: 27808037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Outcomes after decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison between minimally invasive unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression and open laminectomy: clinical article.
    Mobbs RJ; Li J; Sivabalan P; Raley D; Rao PJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Aug; 21(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 24878273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reducing surgical levels by paraspinal mapping and diffusion tensor imaging techniques in lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Chen HB; Wan Q; Xu QF; Chen Y; Bai B
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2016 Apr; 11(1):47. PubMed ID: 27113931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of depression symptoms on patient expectations and clinical outcomes in the surgical management of spinal stenosis.
    Urban-Baeza A; Zárate-Kalfópulos B; Romero-Vargas S; Obil-Chavarría C; Brenes-Rojas L; Reyes-Sánchez A
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Jan; 22(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 25380536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of sagittal spinopelvic alignment on clinical outcomes after decompression surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis without coronal imbalance.
    Hikata T; Watanabe K; Fujita N; Iwanami A; Hosogane N; Ishii K; Nakamura M; Toyama Y; Matsumoto M
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Oct; 23(4):451-8. PubMed ID: 26140404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.