BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24991022)

  • 1. European breast cancer service screening outcomes: a first balance sheet of the benefits and harms.
    Paci E; Broeders M; Hofvind S; Puliti D; Duffy SW;
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2014 Jul; 23(7):1159-63. PubMed ID: 24991022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Summary of the evidence of breast cancer service screening outcomes in Europe and first estimate of the benefit and harm balance sheet.
    Paci E;
    J Med Screen; 2012; 19 Suppl 1():5-13. PubMed ID: 22972806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The balance sheet of benefits and harms of breast cancer population-based screening in Europe: outcome research, practice and future challenges.
    Broeders M; Paci E
    Womens Health (Lond); 2015 Nov; 11(6):883-90. PubMed ID: 26619214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Benefit-to-harm ratio of the Danish breast cancer screening programme.
    Beau AB; Lynge E; Njor SH; Vejborg I; Lophaven SN
    Int J Cancer; 2017 Aug; 141(3):512-518. PubMed ID: 28470685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Benefits and harms of mammography screening.
    Løberg M; Lousdal ML; Bretthauer M; Kalager M
    Breast Cancer Res; 2015 May; 17(1):63. PubMed ID: 25928287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.
    Lynge E
    APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Breast cancer mortality in mammographic screening in Europe: a review of incidence-based mortality studies.
    Njor S; Nyström L; Moss S; Paci E; Broeders M; Segnan N; Lynge E;
    J Med Screen; 2012; 19 Suppl 1():33-41. PubMed ID: 22972809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Breast cancer screening in Austria: Key figures, age limits, screening intervals and evidence].
    Jeitler K; Semlitsch T; Posch N; Siebenhofer A; Horvath K
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2015; 109(4-5):363-70. PubMed ID: 26354136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A systematic assessment of benefits and risks to guide breast cancer screening decisions.
    Pace LE; Keating NL
    JAMA; 2014 Apr; 311(13):1327-35. PubMed ID: 24691608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The value of modern mammography screening in the control of breast cancer: understanding the underpinnings of the current debates.
    Smith RA
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2014 Jul; 23(7):1139-46. PubMed ID: 24991021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantifying the benefits and harms of screening mammography.
    Welch HG; Passow HJ
    JAMA Intern Med; 2014 Mar; 174(3):448-54. PubMed ID: 24380095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mammographic screening for breast cancer. Overdiagnosis: an insidious adverse effect of screening.
    Prescrire Int; 2015 Jul; 24(162):186-9, 191. PubMed ID: 26240891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.
    US Preventive Services Task Force
    Ann Intern Med; 2009 Nov; 151(10):716-26, W-236. PubMed ID: 19920272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Toward the breast screening balance sheet: cumulative risk of false positives for annual versus biennial mammograms commencing at age 40 or 50.
    Winch CJ; Sherman KA; Boyages J
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Jan; 149(1):211-21. PubMed ID: 25476499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Overdiagnosis in mammographic screening for breast cancer in Europe: a literature review.
    Puliti D; Duffy SW; Miccinesi G; de Koning H; Lynge E; Zappa M; Paci E;
    J Med Screen; 2012; 19 Suppl 1():42-56. PubMed ID: 22972810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality-of-life effects of screening mammography in Norway.
    Zahl PH; Kalager M; Suhrke P; Nord E
    Int J Cancer; 2020 Apr; 146(8):2104-2112. PubMed ID: 31254388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Towards personalized screening: Cumulative risk of breast cancer screening outcomes in women with and without a first-degree relative with a history of breast cancer.
    Ripping TM; Hubbard RA; Otten JD; den Heeten GJ; Verbeek AL; Broeders MJ
    Int J Cancer; 2016 Apr; 138(7):1619-25. PubMed ID: 26537645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. First report of introducing population-based breast cancer screening in Poland: experience of the 3-million population region of Lower Silesia.
    Matkowski R; Szynglarewicz B
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2011 Dec; 35(6):e111-5. PubMed ID: 21840281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. United States Preventive Services Task Force screening mammography recommendations: science ignored.
    Hendrick RE; Helvie MA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Feb; 196(2):W112-6. PubMed ID: 21257850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mammography screening. Benefits, harms, and informed choice.
    Jørgensen KJ
    Dan Med J; 2013 Apr; 60(4):B4614. PubMed ID: 23651722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.