BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24991361)

  • 1. Rapid expansion of new oncology care delivery payment models: results from a payer survey.
    Greenapple R
    Am Health Drug Benefits; 2013 Jul; 6(5):249-56. PubMed ID: 24991361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Emerging trends in cancer care: health plans' and pharmacy benefit managers' perspectives on changing care models.
    Greenapple R
    Am Health Drug Benefits; 2012 Jul; 5(4):242-53. PubMed ID: 24991323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Early experiences with accountable care in Medicaid: special challenges, big opportunities.
    Kocot SL; Dang-Vu C; White R; McClellan M
    Popul Health Manag; 2013; 16 Suppl 1():S4-11. PubMed ID: 24070249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Unraveling the Complexity in the Design and Implementation of Bundled Payments: A Scoping Review of Key Elements From a Payer's Perspective.
    Steenhuis S; Struijs J; Koolman X; Ket J; VAN DER Hijden E
    Milbank Q; 2020 Mar; 98(1):197-222. PubMed ID: 31909852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Payer perceptions on the use of patient-reported outcomes in oncology decision making.
    Oderda G; Brixner D; Biskupiak J; Burgoyne D; Arondekar B; Deal LS; Quek RG; Niyazov A
    J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2022 Feb; 28(2):188-195. PubMed ID: 34806908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The evolution of payer management of oncology drugs in the United States between 2017 and 2022.
    Runyan A; Yi J; Honcz J
    J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2023 Oct; 29(10):1138-1149. PubMed ID: 37695273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Consumer, physician, and payer perspectives on primary care medication management services with a shared resource pharmacists network.
    Smith M; Cannon-Breland ML; Spiggle S
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2014; 10(3):539-53. PubMed ID: 24055137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improving Oncology Quality Measurement in Accountable Care: Filling Gaps with Cross-Cutting Measures.
    Valuck T; Blaisdell D; Dugan DP; Westrich K; Dubois RW; Miller RS; McClellan M
    J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2017 Feb; 23(2):174-181. PubMed ID: 28125364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Emerging lessons from regional and state innovation in value-based payment reform: balancing collaboration and disruptive innovation.
    Conrad DA; Grembowski D; Hernandez SE; Lau B; Marcus-Smith M
    Milbank Q; 2014 Sep; 92(3):568-623. PubMed ID: 25199900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Payer perceptions on the use of economic models in oncology decision making.
    Biskupiak J; Oderda G; Brixner D; Burgoyne D; Arondekar B; Niyazov A
    J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2021 Nov; 27(11):1560-1567. PubMed ID: 34714111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Survey of Innovative Reimbursement Models in Spine Care.
    Kazberouk A; McGuire K; Landon BE
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Feb; 41(4):344-52. PubMed ID: 26555826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Community oncology in an era of payment reform.
    Cox JV; Ward JC; Hornberger JC; Temel JS; McAneny BL
    Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book; 2014; ():e447-52. PubMed ID: 24857138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Updates to the ASCO Patient-Centered Oncology Payment Model.
    Ward JC; Bourbeau B; Chin AL; Page RD; Grubbs SS; Kamin DY; Green SR; Rappaport M
    JCO Oncol Pract; 2020 May; 16(5):263-269. PubMed ID: 32302272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Current and Future Oncology Management in the United States.
    Runyan A; Banks J; Bruni DS
    J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2019 Feb; 25(2):272-281. PubMed ID: 30698085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Payer and Developer perspectives on alternative payment models.
    Moradian R; Meshesha T; Trusheim M; Barlow JF
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2024 Feb; 24(2):293-301. PubMed ID: 37883069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Design and impact of bundled payment for detox and follow-up care.
    Quinn AE; Hodgkin D; Perloff JN; Stewart MT; Brolin M; Lane N; Horgan CM
    J Subst Abuse Treat; 2017 Nov; 82():113-121. PubMed ID: 29021109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Oncologist Support for Consolidated Payments for Cancer Care Management in the United States.
    Narayanan S; Hautamaki E
    Am Health Drug Benefits; 2016 Jul; 9(5):280-9. PubMed ID: 27625745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Economics of Provider Payment Reform: Are Accountable Care Organizations the Answer?
    Feldman R
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 2015 Aug; 40(4):745-60. PubMed ID: 26124297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Decision Making on Medical Innovations in a Changing Health Care Environment: Insights from Accountable Care Organizations and Payers on Personalized Medicine and Other Technologies.
    Trosman JR; Weldon CB; Douglas MP; Deverka PA; Watkins JB; Phillips KA
    Value Health; 2017 Jan; 20(1):40-46. PubMed ID: 28212967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The opportunity for health plans to improve quality and reduce costs by embracing primary care medical homes.
    Collins S; Piper KB; Owens G
    Am Health Drug Benefits; 2013 Jan; 6(1):30-8. PubMed ID: 24991345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.