These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24992246)

  • 1. A comparison of stopping rules for computerized adaptive screening measures using the rating scale model.
    Leroux AJ; Dodd BG
    J Appl Meas; 2014; 15(3):213-26. PubMed ID: 24992246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Parameter recovery for the rating scale model using PARSCALE.
    French GA; Dodd BG
    J Outcome Meas; 1999; 3(2):176-99. PubMed ID: 10204326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of item pool restriction on the precision of ability measurement for a Rasch-based CAT: comparisons to traditional fixed length examinations.
    Halkitis PN
    J Outcome Meas; 1998; 2(2):97-122. PubMed ID: 9661734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Variable-Length Stopping Rules for Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing.
    Wang C; Weiss DJ; Shang Z
    Psychometrika; 2019 Sep; 84(3):749-771. PubMed ID: 30511327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computer Adaptive Test Stopping Rules Applied to The Flexilevel Shoulder Functioning Test.
    Combs TJ; English KW; Dodd BG; Kang HA
    J Appl Meas; 2019; 20(1):66-78. PubMed ID: 30789833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An Investigation of Exposure Control Methods With Variable-Length CAT Using the Partial Credit Model.
    Leroux AJ; Waid-Ebbs JK; Wen PS; Helmer DA; Graham DP; O'Connor MK; Ray K
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Nov; 43(8):624-638. PubMed ID: 31551640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing computer adaptive testing stopping rules under the generalized partial-credit model.
    Stafford RE; Runyon CR; Casabianca JM; Dodd BG
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Jun; 51(3):1305-1320. PubMed ID: 29926441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A New Stopping Rule for Computerized Adaptive Testing.
    Choi SW; Grady MW; Dodd BG
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2010 Dec; 70(6):1-17. PubMed ID: 21278821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measurement Precision and Efficiency of Computerized Adaptive Testing for the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale in People With Stroke.
    Seamon BA; Kautz SA; Velozo CA
    Phys Ther; 2021 Apr; 101(4):. PubMed ID: 33481989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stopping Rules for Computer Adaptive Testing When Item Banks Have Nonuniform Information.
    Morris SB; Bass M; Howard E; Neapolitan RE
    Int J Test; 2020; 20(2):146-168. PubMed ID: 32982603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Functioning and validity of a Computerized Adaptive Test to measure anxiety (A-CAT).
    Becker J; Fliege H; Kocalevent RD; Bjorner JB; Rose M; Walter OB; Klapp BF
    Depress Anxiety; 2008; 25(12):E182-94. PubMed ID: 18979458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An investigation of factors affecting test equating in latent trait theory.
    Suanthong S; Schumacker RE; Beyerlein MM
    J Appl Meas; 2000; 1(1):25-43. PubMed ID: 12023556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The maximum priority index method for severely constrained item selection in computerized adaptive testing.
    Cheng Y; Chang HH
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):369-83. PubMed ID: 18534047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A rasch analysis of the statistical anxiety rating scale.
    Teman ED
    J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(4):414-34. PubMed ID: 24064581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Item reduction in a scale for screening.
    Liu X; Jin Z
    Stat Med; 2007 Oct; 26(23):4311-27. PubMed ID: 17357995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Marginal likelihood inference for a model for item responses and response times.
    Glas CA; van der Linden WJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Nov; 63(Pt 3):603-26. PubMed ID: 20109271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of real data and simulated data analysis of a stopping rule based on the standard error of measurement in computerized adaptive testing for medical examinations in Korea: a psychometric study.
    Seo DG; Choi J; Kim J
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2024; 21():18. PubMed ID: 38977033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Grooming a CAT: customizing CAT administration rules to increase response efficiency in specific research and clinical settings.
    Kallen MA; Cook KF; Amtmann D; Knowlton E; Gershon RC
    Qual Life Res; 2018 Sep; 27(9):2403-2413. PubMed ID: 29730850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Features of the sampling distribution of the ability estimate in computerized adaptive testing according to two stopping rules.
    Blais JG; Raiche G
    J Appl Meas; 2010; 11(4):424-31. PubMed ID: 21164229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Applying computerized adaptive testing to the CES-D scale: a simulation study.
    Smits N; Cuijpers P; van Straten A
    Psychiatry Res; 2011 Jun; 188(1):147-55. PubMed ID: 21208660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.