These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24992246)

  • 21. Development of a Flexilevel Scale for use with computer-adaptive testing for assessing shoulder function.
    Cook KF; Roddey TS; O'Malley KJ; Gartsman GM
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2005; 14(1 Suppl S):90S-94S. PubMed ID: 15726093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Performance of the likelihood ratio difference (G2 Diff) test for detecting unidimensionality in applications of the multidimensional Rasch model.
    Harrell-Williams L; Wolfe EW
    J Appl Meas; 2014; 15(3):267-75. PubMed ID: 24992250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Improving personality facet scores with multidimensional computer adaptive testing: an illustration with the NEO PI-R.
    Makransky G; Mortensen EL; Glas CA
    Assessment; 2013 Feb; 20(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 22357698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Development of a computerized adaptive test for assessing balance function in patients with stroke.
    Hsueh IP; Chen JH; Wang CH; Chen CT; Sheu CF; Wang WC; Hou WH; Hsieh CL
    Phys Ther; 2010 Sep; 90(9):1336-44. PubMed ID: 20592269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Adaptive testing for psychological assessment: how many items are enough to run an adaptive testing algorithm?
    Wagner-Menghin MM; Masters GN
    J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(2):106-17. PubMed ID: 23816590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Rotating item banks versus restriction of maximum exposure rates in computerized adaptive testing.
    Barrada JR; Olea J; Abad FJ
    Span J Psychol; 2008 Nov; 11(2):618-25. PubMed ID: 18988447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparing Imputation Methods for Trait Estimation Using the Rating Scale Model.
    Stafford RE; Runyon CR; Casabianca JM; Dodd BG
    J Appl Meas; 2017; 18(1):12-27. PubMed ID: 28453496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Computerized adaptive testing: the capitalization on chance problem.
    Olea J; Barrada JR; Abad FJ; Ponsoda V; Cuevas L
    Span J Psychol; 2012 Mar; 15(1):424-41. PubMed ID: 22379731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Psychometric analysis of the BASC-2 Behavioral and Emotional Screening System (BESS) student form: Results from high school student samples.
    Harrell-Williams LM; Raines TC; Kamphaus RW; Dever BV
    Psychol Assess; 2015 Jun; 27(2):738-43. PubMed ID: 25642926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Varying the valuating function and the presentable bank in computerized adaptive testing.
    Barrada JR; Abad FJ; Olea J
    Span J Psychol; 2011 May; 14(1):500-8. PubMed ID: 21568205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Polytomous modeling of cognitive errors in computer adaptive testing.
    Wang L; Li CS
    J Appl Meas; 2001; 2(4):356-78. PubMed ID: 12011504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Estimating Skin Cancer Risk: Evaluating Mobile Computer-Adaptive Testing.
    Djaja N; Janda M; Olsen CM; Whiteman DC; Chien TW
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 Jan; 18(1):e22. PubMed ID: 26800642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Impact of Item Parameter Drift in Computer Adaptive Testing (CAT).
    Risk N
    J Appl Meas; 2016; 17(1):54-78. PubMed ID: 26784378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A Study of Rasch, partial credit, and rating scale model parameter recovery in WINSTEPS and jMetrik.
    Meyer JP; Hailey E
    J Appl Meas; 2012; 13(3):248-58. PubMed ID: 23234828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Estimation of a four-parameter item response theory model.
    Loken E; Rulison KL
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Nov; 63(Pt 3):509-25. PubMed ID: 20030965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Relative precision, efficiency and construct validity of different starting and stopping rules for a computerized adaptive test: the GAIN substance problem scale.
    Riley BB; Conrad KJ; Bezruczko N; Dennis ML
    J Appl Meas; 2007; 8(1):48-64. PubMed ID: 17215565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Standard setting with dichotomous and constructed response items: some Rasch model approaches.
    MacCann RG
    J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(4):438-54. PubMed ID: 19934530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Item selection rules in a Computerized Adaptive Test for the assessment of written English].
    Barrada JR; Olea J; Ponsoda V; Abad FJ
    Psicothema; 2006 Nov; 18(4):828-34. PubMed ID: 17296125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Predicting item exposure parameters in computerized adaptive testing.
    Chen SY; Doong SH
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 May; 61(Pt 1):75-91. PubMed ID: 18482476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Testing hypotheses involving Cronbach's alpha using marginal models.
    Kuijpers RE; van der Ark LA; Croon MA
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 Nov; 66(3):503-20. PubMed ID: 23663052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.