These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24992246)

  • 61. Comparing single-pool and multiple-pool designs regarding test security in computerized testing.
    Zhang J; Chang HH; Yi Q
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Sep; 44(3):742-52. PubMed ID: 22218817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Item response theory, computerized adaptive testing, and PROMIS: assessment of physical function.
    Fries JF; Witter J; Rose M; Cella D; Khanna D; Morgan-DeWitt E
    J Rheumatol; 2014 Jan; 41(1):153-8. PubMed ID: 24241485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Predictive validity of the Macleod Clark Professional Identity Scale for undergraduate nursing students.
    Worthington M; Salamonson Y; Weaver R; Cleary M
    Nurse Educ Today; 2013 Mar; 33(3):187-91. PubMed ID: 22326211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Standard Error of Ability Estimates and the Classification Accuracy and Consistency of Binary Decisions.
    Cheng Y; Liu C; Behrens J
    Psychometrika; 2015 Sep; 80(3):645-64. PubMed ID: 25228494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Computerized adaptive personality assessment: an illustration with the Absorption scale.
    Waller NG; Reise SP
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1989 Dec; 57(6):1051-8. PubMed ID: 2614658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Termination Rules for Variable-Length CD-CAT From the Information Theory Perspective.
    Guo L; Zheng C
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():1122. PubMed ID: 31191385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. simpolycat: an SAS program for conducting CAT simulation based on polytomous IRT models.
    Chen SK; Cook KF
    Behav Res Methods; 2009 May; 41(2):499-506. PubMed ID: 19363190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Continuous Online Item Calibration: Parameter Recovery and Item Utilization.
    Ren H; van der Linden WJ; Diao Q
    Psychometrika; 2017 Jun; 82(2):498-522. PubMed ID: 28290109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Evaluation of stopping rules for audiological ascending test procedures using computer simulations.
    Marshall L; Hanna TE
    J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Jun; 32(2):265-73. PubMed ID: 2739377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. The Asymptotic Distribution of Average Test Overlap Rate in Computerized Adaptive Testing.
    Choe EM; Chang HH
    Psychometrika; 2019 Dec; 84(4):1129-1151. PubMed ID: 31264029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Optimal number of strata for the stratified methods in computerized adaptive testing.
    Barrada JR; Abad FJ; Olea J
    Span J Psychol; 2014; 17():E48. PubMed ID: 25012203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Stopping rules for multi-category computerized classification testing.
    Wang C; Chen P; Huebner A
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2021 May; 74(2):184-202. PubMed ID: 32240554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Stochastic Curtailment in Adaptive Mastery Testing: Improving the Efficiency of Confidence Interval-Based Stopping Rules.
    Sie H; Finkelman MD; Bartroff J; Thompson NA
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2015 Jun; 39(4):278-292. PubMed ID: 29881008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. DifScal: a tool for analyzing difference ratings on an ordinal category scale.
    Boschman MC
    Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2001 Feb; 33(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 11296716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. EZ does it! Extensions of the EZ-diffusion model.
    Wagenmakers EJ; van der Maas HL; Dolan CV; Grasman RP
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Dec; 15(6):1229-35. PubMed ID: 19001594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Token swap test revisited.
    Heckerling PS
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2003 Mar; 70(3):265-9. PubMed ID: 12581559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. [Not Available].
    Pflege; 2017; 30(5):299. PubMed ID: 28976276
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Re: "Presenting statistical uncertainty in trends and dose-response relations".
    Hopper JL; Dite GS
    Am J Epidemiol; 2002 May; 155(10):977-8; author reply 978-9. PubMed ID: 11994239
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Tracking with (Un)Certainty.
    Hofman AD; Brinkhuis MJS; Bolsinova M; Klaiber J; Maris G; van der Maas HLJ
    J Intell; 2020 Mar; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 32138312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. A Simulation Study Of Three Methods For Determining The Number Of Image Components.
    Anderson RD; Acito F; Lee H
    Multivariate Behav Res; 1982 Oct; 17(4):493-502. PubMed ID: 26781563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.