261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24992251)
1. Applying the Rasch sampler to identify aberrant responding through person fit statistics under fixed nominal α-level.
Spoden C; Fleischer J; Leutner D
J Appl Meas; 2014; 15(3):276-91. PubMed ID: 24992251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stochastic search item selection for factor analytic models.
Mavridis D; Ntzoufras I
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2014 May; 67(2):284-303. PubMed ID: 23837882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The linear transformation model with frailties for the analysis of item response times.
Wang C; Chang HH; Douglas JA
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 Feb; 66(1):144-68. PubMed ID: 22506914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnosing item score patterns on a test using item response theory-based person-fit statistics.
Meijer RR
Psychol Methods; 2003 Mar; 8(1):72-87. PubMed ID: 12741674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adjusted Rasch person-fit statistics.
Dimitrov DM; Smith RM
J Appl Meas; 2006; 7(2):170-83. PubMed ID: 16632900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Identifying measurement disturbance effects using Rasch item fit statistics and the Logit Residual Index.
Mount RE; Schumacker RE
J Outcome Meas; 1998; 2(4):338-50. PubMed ID: 9803719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The family approach to assessing fit in Rasch measurement.
Smith RM; Plackner C
J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(4):424-37. PubMed ID: 19934529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance of the likelihood ratio difference (G2 Diff) test for detecting unidimensionality in applications of the multidimensional Rasch model.
Harrell-Williams L; Wolfe EW
J Appl Meas; 2014; 15(3):267-75. PubMed ID: 24992250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Type I errors and power of the parametric bootstrap goodness-of-fit test: full and limited information.
Tollenaar N; Mooijaart A
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 Nov; 56(Pt 2):271-88. PubMed ID: 14633336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Marginal likelihood inference for a model for item responses and response times.
Glas CA; van der Linden WJ
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Nov; 63(Pt 3):603-26. PubMed ID: 20109271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A critique of Rasch residual fit statistics.
Karabatsos G
J Appl Meas; 2000; 1(2):152-76. PubMed ID: 12029176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bootstrap standard error and confidence intervals for the correlation corrected for range restriction: a simulation study.
Chan W; Chan DW
Psychol Methods; 2004 Sep; 9(3):369-85. PubMed ID: 15355154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Snijders's correction of Infit and Outfit indexes with estimated ability level: an analysis with the Rasch model.
Magis D; Beland S; Raiche G
J Appl Meas; 2014; 15(1):82-93. PubMed ID: 24518583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Estimating the pi* goodness of fit index for finite mixtures of item response models.
Revuelta J
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 May; 61(Pt 1):93-113. PubMed ID: 18482477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An Examination of Sensitivity to Measurement Error in Rasch Residual-based Fit Statistics.
Padgett RN; Morgan GB
J Appl Meas; 2019; 20(4):354-366. PubMed ID: 31730543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detecting differential item functioning with five standardized item-fit indices in the Rasch model.
Seol H
J Outcome Meas; 1999; 3(3):233-47. PubMed ID: 10431491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. On robustness and power of the likelihood-ratio test as a model test of the linear logistic test model.
Hohensinn C; Kubinger KD; Reif M
J Appl Meas; 2014; 15(3):252-66. PubMed ID: 24992249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. New heterogeneous test statistics for the unbalanced fixed-effect nested design.
Guo JH; Billard L; Luh WM
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 May; 64(Pt 2):259-76. PubMed ID: 21492132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Testing hypotheses involving Cronbach's alpha using marginal models.
Kuijpers RE; van der Ark LA; Croon MA
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 Nov; 66(3):503-20. PubMed ID: 23663052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multilevel IRT using dichotomous and polytomous response data.
Fox JP
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2005 May; 58(Pt 1):145-72. PubMed ID: 15969844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
