225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24992683)
1. The relationship between Stroop and stop-signal measures of inhibition in adolescents: influences from variations in context and measure estimation.
Khng KH; Lee K
PLoS One; 2014; 9(7):e101356. PubMed ID: 24992683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evidence for interaction between the stop signal and the Stroop task conflict.
Kalanthroff E; Goldfarb L; Henik A
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):579-92. PubMed ID: 22390293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Inhibitory mechanisms involved in Stroop-matching and stop-signal tasks and the role of impulsivity.
Portugal ACA; Afonso AS; Caldas AL; Maturana W; Mocaiber I; Machado-Pinheiro W
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Nov; 191():234-243. PubMed ID: 30343096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Individual but not fragile: individual differences in task control predict Stroop facilitation.
Kalanthroff E; Henik A
Conscious Cogn; 2013 Jun; 22(2):413-9. PubMed ID: 23416541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Deficits in inhibitory control and conflict resolution on cognitive and motor tasks in Parkinson's disease.
Obeso I; Wilkinson L; Casabona E; Bringas ML; Álvarez M; Álvarez L; Pavón N; Rodríguez-Oroz MC; Macías R; Obeso JA; Jahanshahi M
Exp Brain Res; 2011 Jul; 212(3):371-84. PubMed ID: 21643718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Test-retest reliability of standard and emotional stroop tasks: an investigation of color-word and picture-word versions.
Strauss GP; Allen DN; Jorgensen ML; Cramer SL
Assessment; 2005 Sep; 12(3):330-7. PubMed ID: 16123253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Alcohol effects on response inhibition: Variability across tasks and individuals.
Bartholow BD; Fleming KA; Wood PK; Cowan N; Saults JS; Altamirano L; Miyake A; Martins J; Sher KJ
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2018 Jun; 26(3):251-267. PubMed ID: 29863383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interference scores have inadequate concurrent and convergent validity: Should we stop using the flanker, Simon, and spatial Stroop tasks?
Paap KR; Anders-Jefferson R; Zimiga B; Mason L; Mikulinsky R
Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 Feb; 5(1):7. PubMed ID: 32056032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Control over task conflict in the stroop and affordances tasks: an individual differences study.
Littman R; Kalanthroff E
Psychol Res; 2021 Sep; 85(6):2420-2427. PubMed ID: 32894341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An electrophysiological correlate of conflict processing in an auditory spatial Stroop task: the effect of individual differences in navigational style.
Buzzell GA; Roberts DM; Baldwin CL; McDonald CG
Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Nov; 90(2):265-71. PubMed ID: 23994425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Characterization of inhibitory failure in Multiple Sclerosis: Evidence of impaired conflict resolution.
Ternes AM; Clough M; Foletta P; White O; Fielding J
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2019 Apr; 41(3):320-329. PubMed ID: 30526274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Task format modulates the relationship between reading ability and Stroop interference.
Ziaka L; Skoteinou D; Protopapas A
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Apr; 48(4):275-288. PubMed ID: 35143252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of inhibition in two timed reaction tasks: the color and emotion Stroop tasks.
Cothran DL; Larsen R
J Psychol; 2008 Jul; 142(4):373-85. PubMed ID: 18792649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relationship of regular physical activity with neuroelectric indices of interference processing in young adults.
Aly M; Kojima H
Psychophysiology; 2020 Dec; 57(12):e13674. PubMed ID: 33460156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Acute alcohol does not impair attentional inhibition as measured with Stroop interference scores but impairs Stroop performance.
Riedel P; Wolff M; Spreer M; Petzold J; Plawecki MH; Goschke T; Zimmermann US; Smolka MN
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2021 Jun; 238(6):1593-1607. PubMed ID: 33660080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stop interfering: Stroop task conflict independence from informational conflict and interference.
Kalanthroff E; Goldfarb L; Usher M; Henik A
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(7):1356-67. PubMed ID: 23163896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Poor Stroop performances in 15-year-old dyslexic teenagers.
Kapoula Z; Lê TT; Bonnet A; Bourtoire P; Demule E; Fauvel C; Quilicci C; Yang Q
Exp Brain Res; 2010 Jun; 203(2):419-25. PubMed ID: 20437170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interference control in children with reading difficulties.
Wang S; Gathercole SE
Child Neuropsychol; 2015; 21(4):418-31. PubMed ID: 24852235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Individual Differences in Inhibitory Control: A latent Variable Analysis.
Gärtner A; Strobel A
J Cogn; 2021 Feb; 4(1):17. PubMed ID: 33634234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The color-word Stroop effect driven by working memory maintenance.
Pan Y; Han Y; Zuo W
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Nov; 81(8):2722-2731. PubMed ID: 31214969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
