186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24992848)
1. A comparative evaluation of tray spacer thickness and repeat pour on the accuracy of monophasic polyvinyl siloxane impression material: in vitro study.
Kumar S; Yadav D; Yadav R; Arora A
Indian J Dent Res; 2014; 25(2):184-7. PubMed ID: 24992848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of tray space and repeat pours on the accuracy of monophasic polyvinylsiloxane impression.
Rajapur A; Dixit S; Hoshing C; Raikar SP
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Nov; 13(6):824-9. PubMed ID: 23404010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of tray space on the accuracy of monophasic polyvinylsiloxane impressions.
Tjan AH; Nemetz H; Nguyen LT; Contino R
J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Jul; 68(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 1403906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of impressions with different impression materials in angulated implants.
Reddy S; Prasad K; Vakil H; Jain A; Chowdhary R
Niger J Clin Pract; 2013; 16(3):279-84. PubMed ID: 23771446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of impression tray design upon the accuracy of stone casts produced from a single-phase medium-bodied polyvinyl siloxane impression material.
Saunders WP; Sharkey SW; Smith GM; Taylor WG
J Dent; 1992 Jun; 20(3):189-92. PubMed ID: 1624625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluating the Effect of Different Impression Techniques and Splinting Methods on the Dimensional Accuracy of Multiple Implant Impressions: An in vitro Study.
Saini HS; Jain S; Kumar S; Aggarwal R; Choudhary S; Reddy NK
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Aug; 19(8):1005-1012. PubMed ID: 30150505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy of Stone Models Fabricated by Three Different Impression Techniques Using Two Brands of Polyvinyl Siloxane Impression Materials.
Garg S; Kumar S; Jain S; Aggarwal R; Choudhary S; Reddy NK
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Aug; 20(8):928-934. PubMed ID: 31797849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Linear dimensional accuracy of a polyvinyl siloxane of varying viscosities using different impression techniques.
Mishra S; Chowdhary R
J Investig Clin Dent; 2010 Aug; 1(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 25427185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy of Three Different Impression Materials Using Three Different Techniques for Implant Impressions: An
Khan SA; Singh S; Neyaz N; Jaiswal MM; Tanwar AS; Singh A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Feb; 22(2):172-178. PubMed ID: 34257178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of Selective Laser Melted Bar Retaining Mandibular Implant-Assisted Overdenture: An In Vitro Comparison of Different Impression Materials and Techniques.
El-Asfahani IA; Ramdan AS; Agamy EMTM
J Oral Implantol; 2023 Dec; 49(6):590-598. PubMed ID: 38279655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of impression tray design and impression technique upon the accuracy of stone casts produced from a putty-wash polyvinyl siloxane impression material.
Saunders WP; Sharkey SW; Smith GM; Taylor WG
J Dent; 1991 Oct; 19(5):283-9. PubMed ID: 1806594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of three polyvinyl siloxane putty-wash impression techniques.
Nissan J; Laufer BZ; Brosh T; Assif D
J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Feb; 83(2):161-5. PubMed ID: 10668027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of the second pour casts using dual-arch trays.
Broilo JR; Ghiggi PC; Borges GA; Burnett LH; Spohr AM
Stomatologija; 2011; 13(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 21558786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the accuracy of plastic and metal stock trays for implant impressions.
Del'acqua MA; de Avila ÉD; Amaral ÂL; Pinelli LA; de Assis Mollo F
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):544-50. PubMed ID: 22616047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of wash bulk on the accuracy of polyvinyl siloxane putty-wash impressions.
Nissan J; Gross M; Shifman A; Assif D
J Oral Rehabil; 2002 Apr; 29(4):357-61. PubMed ID: 11966969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative evaluation of the effects of implant position, impression material, and tray type on implant impression accuracy.
Gökçen-Rohlig B; Ongül D; Sancakli E; Sermet B
Implant Dent; 2014 Jun; 23(3):283-8. PubMed ID: 24844388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Working times and dimensional accuracy of the one-step putty/wash impression technique.
Richards MW; Zeiaei S; Bagby MD; Okubo S; Soltani J
J Prosthodont; 1998 Dec; 7(4):250-5. PubMed ID: 10196845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of Dimensional Accuracy of Three Combinations of Polyvinyl Siloxane Impression Material: An
Mahagaonkar PA; Angadi PB; Naik NR; Kakatkar V; Manjunath SH; Sonawane YS
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Feb; 21(2):190-196. PubMed ID: 32381826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative evaluation of dimensional accuracy of different polyvinyl siloxane putty-wash impression techniques-in vitro study.
Dugal R; Railkar B; Musani S
J Int Oral Health; 2013 Oct; 5(5):85-94. PubMed ID: 24324310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effects of custom tray material on the accuracy of master casts.
Shafa S; Zaree Z; Mosharraf R
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Sep; 9(6):49-56. PubMed ID: 18784859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
