These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24993217)

  • 41. Effects of pitch-shift velocity on voice Fo responses.
    Larson CR; Burnett TA; Kiran S; Hain TC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Jan; 107(1):559-64. PubMed ID: 10641664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The Effect of Pitch and Loudness Auditory Feedback Perturbations on Vocal Quality During Sustained Phonation.
    Schenck A; Hilger AI; Levant S; Kim JH; Lester-Smith RA; Larson C
    J Voice; 2023 Jan; 37(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 33191054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Effects of frequency-shifted feedback on the pitch of vocal productions.
    ELman JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 Jul; 70(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 7264071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Attention modulates cortical processing of pitch feedback errors in voice control.
    Hu H; Liu Y; Guo Z; Li W; Liu P; Chen S; Liu H
    Sci Rep; 2015 Jan; 5():7812. PubMed ID: 25589447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Just noticeable difference of tone pitch contour change for English- and Chinese-native listeners.
    Liu C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):3011-20. PubMed ID: 24116436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Brainstem auditory responses to resolved and unresolved harmonics of a synthetic vowel in quiet and noise.
    Laroche M; Dajani HR; Prévost F; Marcoux AM
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 22814487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Control of voice fundamental frequency in speaking versus singing.
    Natke U; Donath TM; Kalveram KT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Mar; 113(3):1587-93. PubMed ID: 12656393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Grouping and the pitch of a mistuned fundamental component: Effects of applying simultaneous multiple mistunings to the other harmonics.
    Roberts B; Holmes SD
    Hear Res; 2006 Dec; 222(1-2):79-88. PubMed ID: 17055676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Modulation of effective connectivity during vocalization with perturbed auditory feedback.
    Parkinson AL; Korzyukov O; Larson CR; Litvak V; Robin DA
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Jul; 51(8):1471-80. PubMed ID: 23665378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The timbre of the voice as perceived by the singer him-/herself.
    Vurma A
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2014 Apr; 39(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 23510260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Modulation of auditory-vocal feedback control due to planned changes in voice f
    Kim JH; Larson CR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Mar; 145(3):1482. PubMed ID: 31067945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The evaluation of singing voice accuracy: a comparison between subjective and objective methods.
    Larrouy-Maestri P; Lévêque Y; Schön D; Giovanni A; Morsomme D
    J Voice; 2013 Mar; 27(2):259.e1-259.e5. PubMed ID: 23280380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Effects of vocal intensity and vowel type on cepstral analysis of voice.
    Awan SN; Giovinco A; Owens J
    J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):670.e15-20. PubMed ID: 22480754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Effects of simultaneous perturbations of voice pitch and loudness feedback on voice F0 and amplitude control.
    Larson CR; Sun J; Hain TC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 May; 121(5 Pt1):2862-72. PubMed ID: 17550185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Task-Dependent Modulation of Auditory Feedback Control of Vocal Intensity.
    Hilger AI; Levant S; Kim JH; Lester-Smith RA; Larson C
    J Voice; 2022 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 36210225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Unequal effects of speech and nonspeech contexts on the perceptual normalization of Cantonese level tones.
    Zhang C; Peng G; Wang WS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1088-99. PubMed ID: 22894228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Vocal fundamental and formant frequencies affect perceptions of speaker cooperativeness.
    Knowles KK; Little AC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(9):1657-75. PubMed ID: 26360784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Significance of auditory and kinesthetic feedback in vocal training of young professional singers (students)].
    Ciochină AD; Ciochină P; Cobzeanu MD; Burlui A; Zaharia D
    Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2004; 108(4):913-9. PubMed ID: 16004242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Understanding the mechanisms underlying voluntary responses to pitch-shifted auditory feedback.
    Patel S; Nishimura C; Lodhavia A; Korzyukov O; Parkinson A; Robin DA; Larson CR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 May; 135(5):3036-44. PubMed ID: 24815283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Principal pitch of frequency-modulated tones with asymmetrical modulation waveform: a comparison of models.
    Etchemendy PE; Eguia MC; Mesz B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1344-55. PubMed ID: 24606273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.