170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24993544)
1. Boundaries of semantic distraction: dominance and lexicality act at retrieval.
Marsh JE; Perham N; Sörqvist P; Jones DM
Mem Cognit; 2014 Nov; 42(8):1285-301. PubMed ID: 24993544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A semantic mismatch effect on serial recall: Evidence for interlexical processing of irrelevant speech.
Röer JP; Bell R; Körner U; Buchner A
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Mar; 45(3):515-525. PubMed ID: 29985037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The importance of semantic similarity to the irrelevant speech effect.
Neely CB; LeCompte DC
Mem Cognit; 1999 Jan; 27(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 10087854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interference by process, not content, determines semantic auditory distraction.
Marsh JE; Hughes RW; Jones DM
Cognition; 2009 Jan; 110(1):23-38. PubMed ID: 19081558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Auditory distraction eliminates retrieval induced forgetting: implications for the processing of unattended sound.
Marsh JE; Sörqvist P; Beaman CP; Jones DM
Exp Psychol; 2013; 60(5):368-75. PubMed ID: 23681014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of Auditory Distraction on Face Memory.
Bell R; Mieth L; Röer JP; Buchner A
Sci Rep; 2019 Jul; 9(1):10185. PubMed ID: 31308413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Emotional prosody of task-irrelevant speech interferes with the retention of serial order.
Kattner F; Ellermeier W
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1303-1312. PubMed ID: 29629780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cross-modal distraction by background speech: what role for meaning?
Marsh JE; Jones DM
Noise Health; 2010; 12(49):210-6. PubMed ID: 20871175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dynamic cognitive control of irrelevant sound: Increased task engagement attenuates semantic auditory distraction.
Marsh JE; Sörqvist P; Hughes RW
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Oct; 41(5):1462-74. PubMed ID: 26191618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Retrieval of visual, auditory, and abstract semantics.
Noppeney U; Price CJ
Neuroimage; 2002 Apr; 15(4):917-26. PubMed ID: 11906232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The process of auditory distraction: disrupted attention and impaired recall in a simulated lecture environment.
Zeamer C; Fox Tree JE
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1463-72. PubMed ID: 23565786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. False memories through auditory distraction: When irrelevant speech produces memory intrusions in the absence of semantic interference.
Kattner F
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2024 Mar; ():17470218241235654. PubMed ID: 38365601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Retrieval from memory: vulnerable or inviolable?
Jones DM; Marsh JE; Hughes RW
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jul; 38(4):905-22. PubMed ID: 22250910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Semantic additivity and semantic inhibition: dissociable processes in the cerebral hemispheres?
Chiarello C; Richards L; Pollock A
Brain Lang; 1992 Jan; 42(1):52-76. PubMed ID: 1547469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Semantic priming by irrelevant speech.
Röer JP; Körner U; Buchner A; Bell R
Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1205-1210. PubMed ID: 27798754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Synchronized brain activity during rehearsal and short-term memory disruption by irrelevant speech is affected by recall mode.
Kopp F; Schröger E; Lipka S
Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Aug; 61(2):188-203. PubMed ID: 16298003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of semantically related and unrelated text cues on the intelligibility of sentences in noise.
Zekveld AA; Rudner M; Johnsrude IS; Festen JM; van Beek JH; Rönnberg J
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):e16-25. PubMed ID: 21826004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. When does between-sequence phonological similarity promote irrelevant sound disruption?
Marsh JE; Vachon F; Jones DM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):243-8. PubMed ID: 18194067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Levels of processing with free and cued recall and unilateral temporal lobe epilepsy.
Lespinet-Najib V; N'Kaoua B; Sauzéon H; Bresson C; Rougier A; Claverie B
Brain Lang; 2004 Apr; 89(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 15010240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A multilingual preregistered replication of the semantic mismatch effect on serial recall.
Röer JP; Bell R; Buchner A; Saint-Aubin J; Sonier RP; Marsh JE; Moore SB; Kershaw MBA; Ljung R; Arnström S
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Jul; 48(7):966-974. PubMed ID: 34647788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
