These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24993544)

  • 21. Low-frequency neural activity reflects rule-based chunking during speech listening.
    Jin P; Lu Y; Ding N
    Elife; 2020 Apr; 9():. PubMed ID: 32310082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Semantic and phonological contributions to short-term repetition and long-term cued sentence recall.
    Meltzer JA; Rose NS; Deschamps T; Leigh RC; Panamsky L; Silberberg A; Madani N; Links KA
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Feb; 44(2):307-29. PubMed ID: 26374330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of bilingualism, aging, and semantic relatedness on memory under divided attention.
    Fernandes MA; Craik F; Bialystok E; Kreuger S
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2007 Jun; 61(2):128-41. PubMed ID: 17665753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Suffix interference in the recall of linguistically coherent speech.
    Balota DA; Cowan N; Engle RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 May; 16(3):446-56. PubMed ID: 2140403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Memory as discrimination: what distraction reveals.
    Beaman CP; Hanczakowski M; Hodgetts HM; Marsh JE; Jones DM
    Mem Cognit; 2013 Nov; 41(8):1238-51. PubMed ID: 23661190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The development of attribute dominance in the knowledge base.
    Lindberg MA
    J Genet Psychol; 1989 Sep; 150(3):269-80. PubMed ID: 2809574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Divided attention and the encoding effects of retrieval.
    Buchin ZL; Mulligan NW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Oct; 72(10):2474-2494. PubMed ID: 30975038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Interfering with free recall of words: Detrimental effects of phonological competition.
    Fernandes MA; Wammes JD; Priselac S; Moscovitch M
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Sep; 90():59-71. PubMed ID: 27174519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Spatiotemporal convergence of semantic processing in reading and speech perception.
    Vartiainen J; Parviainen T; Salmelin R
    J Neurosci; 2009 Jul; 29(29):9271-80. PubMed ID: 19625517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Age of acquisition affects the retrieval of grammatical category information.
    Bai L; Ma T; Dunlap S; Chen B
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(4):786-800. PubMed ID: 22973983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The automaticity of semantic processing revisited: Auditory distraction by a categorical deviation.
    Vachon F; Marsh JE; Labonté K
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Jul; 149(7):1360-1397. PubMed ID: 31750710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Semantic processing and memory for attended and unattended words in dichotic listening: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Bentin S; Kutas M; Hillyard SA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1995 Feb; 21(1):54-67. PubMed ID: 7707033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The role of speech fidelity in the irrelevant sound effect: Insights from noise-vocoded speech backgrounds.
    Dorsi J; Viswanathan N; Rosenblum LD; Dias JW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Oct; 71(10):2152-2161. PubMed ID: 30226434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Event-related brain potentials during the monitoring of speech errors.
    Schiller NO; Horemans I; Ganushchak L; Koester D
    Neuroimage; 2009 Jan; 44(2):520-30. PubMed ID: 18930155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effects of noise and gender on children's episodic and semantic memory.
    Boman E
    Scand J Psychol; 2004 Nov; 45(5):407-16. PubMed ID: 15535809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Facilitation of memory performance through induced semantic processing in survivors of severe closed-head injury.
    Goldstein FC; Levin HS; Boake C; Lohrey JH
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1990 Mar; 12(2):286-300. PubMed ID: 2341558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Electrophysiological evidence for task effects on semantic priming in auditory word processing.
    Bentin S; Kutas M; Hillyard SA
    Psychophysiology; 1993 Mar; 30(2):161-9. PubMed ID: 8434079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Distraction control processes in free recall: benefits and costs to performance.
    Marsh JE; Sörqvist P; Hodgetts HM; Beaman CP; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Jan; 41(1):118-33. PubMed ID: 25329080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reading is disrupted by intelligible background speech: Evidence from eye-tracking.
    Vasilev MR; Liversedge SP; Rowan D; Kirkby JA; Angele B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Nov; 45(11):1484-1512. PubMed ID: 31436455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Factors modulating the effect of divided attention during retrieval of words.
    Fernandes MA; Moscovitch M
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Jul; 30(5):731-44. PubMed ID: 12219890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.