533 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24993770)
1. Tubal sterilization: pregnancy rates after hysteroscopic versus laparoscopic sterilization in France, 2006-2010.
Fernandez H; Legendre G; Blein C; Lamarsalle L; Panel P
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Sep; 180():133-7. PubMed ID: 24993770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Trends in sterilization since the introduction of Essure hysteroscopic sterilization.
Shavell VI; Abdallah ME; Shade GH; Diamond MP; Berman JM
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 18996773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. ICSI pregnancy outcomes following hysteroscopic placement of Essure devices for hydrosalpinx in laparoscopic contraindicated patients.
Ozgur K; Bulut H; Berkkanoglu M; Coetzee K; Kaya G
Reprod Biomed Online; 2014 Jul; 29(1):113-8. PubMed ID: 24813749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Retrospective cost analysis comparing Essure hysteroscopic sterilization and laparoscopic bilateral tubal coagulation.
Hopkins MR; Creedon DJ; Wagie AE; Williams AR; Famuyide AO
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 17218238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of hysteroscopic sterilization compared with laparoscopic sterilization.
Antoun L; Smith P; Gupta JK; Clark TJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 217(5):570.e1-570.e6. PubMed ID: 28757140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Regret following hysteroscopic tubal sterilization].
Legendre G; Varoux M; Nazac A; Fernandez H
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2014 May; 43(5):387-92. PubMed ID: 24286930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An economic comparison of female sterilization of hysteroscopic tubal occlusion with laparoscopic bilateral tubal ligation.
Kraemer DF; Yen PY; Nichols M
Contraception; 2009 Sep; 80(3):254-60. PubMed ID: 19698817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Association of Hysteroscopic vs Laparoscopic Sterilization With Procedural, Gynecological, and Medical Outcomes.
Bouillon K; Bertrand M; Bader G; Lucot JP; Dray-Spira R; Zureik M
JAMA; 2018 Jan; 319(4):375-387. PubMed ID: 29362796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hysteroscopic proximal tubal occlusion versus laparoscopic salpingectomy as a treatment for hydrosalpinges prior to IVF or ICSI: an RCT.
Dreyer K; Lier MC; Emanuel MH; Twisk JW; Mol BW; Schats R; Hompes PG; Mijatovic V
Hum Reprod; 2016 Sep; 31(9):2005-16. PubMed ID: 27209341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hysteroscopic tubal sterilization (essure) in women with an intrauterine device.
Agostini A; Crochet P; Petrakian M; Estrade JP; Cravello L; Gamerre M
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):277-9. PubMed ID: 18439497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-effectiveness analysis comparing the essure tubal sterilization procedure and laparoscopic tubal sterilization.
Thiel JA; Carson GD
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2008 Jul; 30(7):581-585. PubMed ID: 18644179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Essure hysteroscopic sterilization versus interval laparoscopic bilateral tubal ligation: a comparative effectiveness review.
Ouzounelli M; Reaven NL
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(3):342-52. PubMed ID: 25499775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Essure Permanent Birth Control, Effectiveness and Safety: An Italian 11-Year Survey.
Franchini M; Zizolfi B; Coppola C; Bergamini V; Bonin C; Borsellino G; Busato E; Calabrese S; Calzolari S; Fantin GP; Giarrè G; Litta P; Luerti M; Mangino FP; Marchino GL; Molinari MA; Scatena E; Scrimin F; Telloli P; Di Spiezio Sardo A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(4):640-645. PubMed ID: 28232037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Office hysteroscopic sterilization compared with laparoscopic sterilization: a critical cost analysis.
Levie MD; Chudnoff SG
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(4):318-22. PubMed ID: 16036190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative effectiveness of hysteroscopic and laparoscopic sterilization for women: a retrospective cohort study.
Gariepy AM; Lewis C; Zuckerman D; Tancredi DJ; Murphy E; McDonald-Mosley R; Sonalkar S; Hathaway M; Nunez-Eddy C; Schwarz EB
Fertil Steril; 2022 Jun; 117(6):1322-1331. PubMed ID: 35428480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Probability of pregnancy after sterilization: a comparison of hysteroscopic versus laparoscopic sterilization.
Gariepy AM; Creinin MD; Smith KJ; Xu X
Contraception; 2014 Aug; 90(2):174-81. PubMed ID: 24767963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Healthcare Costs Among Commercially Insured Women in the United States Who Underwent Hysteroscopic Sterilization Versus Laparoscopic Bilateral Tubal Ligation Sterilization.
Carney PI; Yao J; Lin J; Law A
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2017 May; 26(5):483-490. PubMed ID: 28157426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hysteroscopic tubal sterilization: an evidence-based analysis.
McMartin K
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2013; 13(21):1-35. PubMed ID: 24228084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Concomitant hysteroscopic endometrial ablation and Essure procedure: feasibility, efficacy and satisfaction.
Levy-Zauberman Y; Legendre G; Nazac A; Faivre E; Deffieux X; Fernandez H
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Jul; 178():51-5. PubMed ID: 24813100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis of adverse events with Essure hysteroscopic sterilization reported to the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database.
Al-Safi ZA; Shavell VI; Hobson DT; Berman JM; Diamond MP
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(6):825-9. PubMed ID: 24183273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
