These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

533 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24993770)

  • 1. Tubal sterilization: pregnancy rates after hysteroscopic versus laparoscopic sterilization in France, 2006-2010.
    Fernandez H; Legendre G; Blein C; Lamarsalle L; Panel P
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Sep; 180():133-7. PubMed ID: 24993770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Trends in sterilization since the introduction of Essure hysteroscopic sterilization.
    Shavell VI; Abdallah ME; Shade GH; Diamond MP; Berman JM
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 18996773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. ICSI pregnancy outcomes following hysteroscopic placement of Essure devices for hydrosalpinx in laparoscopic contraindicated patients.
    Ozgur K; Bulut H; Berkkanoglu M; Coetzee K; Kaya G
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2014 Jul; 29(1):113-8. PubMed ID: 24813749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retrospective cost analysis comparing Essure hysteroscopic sterilization and laparoscopic bilateral tubal coagulation.
    Hopkins MR; Creedon DJ; Wagie AE; Williams AR; Famuyide AO
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 17218238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of hysteroscopic sterilization compared with laparoscopic sterilization.
    Antoun L; Smith P; Gupta JK; Clark TJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 217(5):570.e1-570.e6. PubMed ID: 28757140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Regret following hysteroscopic tubal sterilization].
    Legendre G; Varoux M; Nazac A; Fernandez H
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2014 May; 43(5):387-92. PubMed ID: 24286930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An economic comparison of female sterilization of hysteroscopic tubal occlusion with laparoscopic bilateral tubal ligation.
    Kraemer DF; Yen PY; Nichols M
    Contraception; 2009 Sep; 80(3):254-60. PubMed ID: 19698817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Association of Hysteroscopic vs Laparoscopic Sterilization With Procedural, Gynecological, and Medical Outcomes.
    Bouillon K; Bertrand M; Bader G; Lucot JP; Dray-Spira R; Zureik M
    JAMA; 2018 Jan; 319(4):375-387. PubMed ID: 29362796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hysteroscopic proximal tubal occlusion versus laparoscopic salpingectomy as a treatment for hydrosalpinges prior to IVF or ICSI: an RCT.
    Dreyer K; Lier MC; Emanuel MH; Twisk JW; Mol BW; Schats R; Hompes PG; Mijatovic V
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Sep; 31(9):2005-16. PubMed ID: 27209341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hysteroscopic tubal sterilization (essure) in women with an intrauterine device.
    Agostini A; Crochet P; Petrakian M; Estrade JP; Cravello L; Gamerre M
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):277-9. PubMed ID: 18439497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost-effectiveness analysis comparing the essure tubal sterilization procedure and laparoscopic tubal sterilization.
    Thiel JA; Carson GD
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2008 Jul; 30(7):581-585. PubMed ID: 18644179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Essure hysteroscopic sterilization versus interval laparoscopic bilateral tubal ligation: a comparative effectiveness review.
    Ouzounelli M; Reaven NL
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(3):342-52. PubMed ID: 25499775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Essure Permanent Birth Control, Effectiveness and Safety: An Italian 11-Year Survey.
    Franchini M; Zizolfi B; Coppola C; Bergamini V; Bonin C; Borsellino G; Busato E; Calabrese S; Calzolari S; Fantin GP; Giarrè G; Litta P; Luerti M; Mangino FP; Marchino GL; Molinari MA; Scatena E; Scrimin F; Telloli P; Di Spiezio Sardo A
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(4):640-645. PubMed ID: 28232037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Office hysteroscopic sterilization compared with laparoscopic sterilization: a critical cost analysis.
    Levie MD; Chudnoff SG
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(4):318-22. PubMed ID: 16036190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative effectiveness of hysteroscopic and laparoscopic sterilization for women: a retrospective cohort study.
    Gariepy AM; Lewis C; Zuckerman D; Tancredi DJ; Murphy E; McDonald-Mosley R; Sonalkar S; Hathaway M; Nunez-Eddy C; Schwarz EB
    Fertil Steril; 2022 Jun; 117(6):1322-1331. PubMed ID: 35428480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Probability of pregnancy after sterilization: a comparison of hysteroscopic versus laparoscopic sterilization.
    Gariepy AM; Creinin MD; Smith KJ; Xu X
    Contraception; 2014 Aug; 90(2):174-81. PubMed ID: 24767963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Healthcare Costs Among Commercially Insured Women in the United States Who Underwent Hysteroscopic Sterilization Versus Laparoscopic Bilateral Tubal Ligation Sterilization.
    Carney PI; Yao J; Lin J; Law A
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2017 May; 26(5):483-490. PubMed ID: 28157426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hysteroscopic tubal sterilization: an evidence-based analysis.
    McMartin K
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2013; 13(21):1-35. PubMed ID: 24228084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Concomitant hysteroscopic endometrial ablation and Essure procedure: feasibility, efficacy and satisfaction.
    Levy-Zauberman Y; Legendre G; Nazac A; Faivre E; Deffieux X; Fernandez H
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Jul; 178():51-5. PubMed ID: 24813100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of adverse events with Essure hysteroscopic sterilization reported to the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database.
    Al-Safi ZA; Shavell VI; Hobson DT; Berman JM; Diamond MP
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(6):825-9. PubMed ID: 24183273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.