These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24993988)

  • 1. Robotic-Enhanced PCI Compared to the Traditional Manual Approach.
    Smilowitz NR; Moses JW; Sosa FA; Lerman B; Qureshi Y; Dalton KE; Privitera LT; Canone-Weber D; Singh V; Leon MB; Weisz G
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2014 Jul; 26(7):318-21. PubMed ID: 24993988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Safety and feasibility of robotic percutaneous coronary intervention: PRECISE (Percutaneous Robotically-Enhanced Coronary Intervention) Study.
    Weisz G; Metzger DC; Caputo RP; Delgado JA; Marshall JJ; Vetrovec GW; Reisman M; Waksman R; Granada JF; Novack V; Moses JW; Carrozza JP
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Apr; 61(15):1596-600. PubMed ID: 23500318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Demonstration of the Safety and Feasibility of Robotically Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Complex Coronary Lesions: Results of the CORA-PCI Study (Complex Robotically Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention).
    Mahmud E; Naghi J; Ang L; Harrison J; Behnamfar O; Pourdjabbar A; Reeves R; Patel M
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Jul; 10(13):1320-1327. PubMed ID: 28683937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of robotics and a suspended lead suit on physician radiation exposure during percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Madder RD; VanOosterhout S; Mulder A; Elmore M; Campbell J; Borgman A; Parker J; Wohns D
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2017; 18(3):190-196. PubMed ID: 28041859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The association between experience and proficiency with robotic-enhanced coronary intervention-insights from the PRECISE multi-center study.
    Weisz G; Smilowitz NR; Metzger DC; Caputo R; Delgado J; Marshall JJ; Vetrovec G; Reisman M; Waksman R; Pichard A; Granada JF; Moses JW; Carrozza JP
    Acute Card Care; 2014 Jun; 16(2):37-40. PubMed ID: 24654789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Successful introduction of robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention system into Japanese clinical practice: a first-year survey at single center.
    Kagiyama K; Mitsutake Y; Ueno T; Sakai S; Nakamura T; Yamaji K; Ishimatsu T; Sasaki M; Chibana H; Itaya N; Sasaki KI; Fukumoto Y
    Heart Vessels; 2021 Jul; 36(7):955-964. PubMed ID: 33502572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Radiation exposure and contrast agent use related to radial versus femoral arterial access during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-Results of the FERARI study.
    Becher T; Behnes M; Ünsal M; Baumann S; El-Battrawy I; Fastner C; Kuschyk J; Papavassiliu T; Hoffmann U; Mashayekhi K; Borggrefe M; Akin I
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2016 Dec; 17(8):505-509. PubMed ID: 27350417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. First-in-human evaluation of a novel robotic-assisted coronary angioplasty system.
    Granada JF; Delgado JA; Uribe MP; Fernandez A; Blanco G; Leon MB; Weisz G
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Apr; 4(4):460-5. PubMed ID: 21511227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Robotic Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Traditional Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of a Large Cohort.
    Patel TM; Shah SC; Soni YY; Radadiya RC; Patel GA; Tiwari PO; Pancholy SB
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 May; 13(5):e008888. PubMed ID: 32406263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robotic Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Initial Australian Experience.
    Leung J; French J; Xu J; Kachwalla H; Kaddapu K; Badie T; Mussap C; Rajaratnam R; Leung D; Lo S; Juergens C
    Heart Lung Circ; 2024 Apr; 33(4):493-499. PubMed ID: 38365501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of radiological risk during coronary angioplasty procedures: comparison of transradial and transfemoral approaches.
    Iwachow P; Miechowicz I; Kałmucki P; Dziki B; Szyszka A; Baszko A; Siminiak T
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Sep; 33(9):1297-1303. PubMed ID: 28364175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effectiveness of low rate fluoroscopy at reducing operator and patient radiation dose during transradial coronary angiography and interventions.
    Abdelaal E; Plourde G; MacHaalany J; Arsenault J; Rimac G; Déry JP; Barbeau G; Larose E; De Larochellière R; Nguyen CM; Allende R; Ribeiro H; Costerousse O; Mongrain R; Bertrand OF;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 May; 7(5):567-74. PubMed ID: 24746649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Magnetic navigation system and CT roadmap-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention: a comparison to the conventional approach.
    Hao R; Zhang Q; Xu Z; Tang L; Yang Z; Cao K; Li C
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2013 Apr; 25(4):177-81. PubMed ID: 23549490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robotically-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention: Reasons for partial manual assistance or manual conversion.
    Harrison J; Ang L; Naghi J; Behnamfar O; Pourdjabbar A; Patel MP; Reeves RR; Mahmud E
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2018 Jul; 19(5 Pt A):526-531. PubMed ID: 29221959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Robotic-enhanced percutaneous coronary revascularization].
    Weisz G
    Harefuah; 2014 Dec; 153(12):738-41, 751. PubMed ID: 25654916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Determinants of fluoroscopy time for invasive coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the NCDR(®).
    Fazel R; Curtis J; Wang Y; Einstein AJ; Smith-Bindman R; Tsai TT; Chen J; Shah ND; Krumholz HM; Nallamothu BK
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Dec; 82(7):1091-105. PubMed ID: 23703793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Complex robotic-enhanced percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Kapur V; Smilowitz NR; Weisz G
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 May; 83(6):915-21. PubMed ID: 24167108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cath Lab Robotics: Paradigm Change in Interventional Cardiology?
    Wegermann ZK; Swaminathan RV; Rao SV
    Curr Cardiol Rep; 2019 Aug; 21(10):119. PubMed ID: 31473815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robotic-assisted angioplasty: current status and future possibilities.
    Smilowitz NR; Weisz G
    Curr Cardiol Rep; 2012 Oct; 14(5):642-6. PubMed ID: 22833302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Safety and Feasibility of a Novel, Second-Generation Robotic-Assisted System for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: First-in-Human Report.
    Smitson CC; Ang L; Pourdjabbar A; Reeves R; Patel M; Mahmud E
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2018 Apr; 30(4):152-156. PubMed ID: 29335386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.