135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24995098)
1. Clinical observation of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
Yin XH; Wang ZQ; Yang SZ; Jia HY; Shi M
Int J Clin Exp Med; 2014; 7(5):1373-7. PubMed ID: 24995098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sentinel lymph node identification and radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in early stage cervical cancer: laparoscopy versus laparotomy.
Díaz-Feijoo B; Gil-Moreno A; Pérez-Benavente MA; Morchón S; Martínez-Palones JM; Xercavins J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(5):531-7. PubMed ID: 18657483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].
Wang W; Shang C; Huang J; Chen S; Shen H; Yao S
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):894-901. PubMed ID: 26887872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Comparative analysis of the prognosis of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer undergoing laparoscopic or abdominal surgery].
Xu YP; Wang ZQ; Liang XD; Wang Y; Wang JL
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Sep; 55(9):609-616. PubMed ID: 32957749
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Laparoscopic detection of sentinel lymph nodes followed by lymph node dissection in patients with early stage cervical cancer.
Buist MR; Pijpers RJ; van Lingen A; van Diest PJ; Dijkstra J; Kenemans P; Verheijen RH
Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Aug; 90(2):290-6. PubMed ID: 12893189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Open versus laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection in early stage cervical cancer: no difference in surgical or disease outcome.
van de Lande J; von Mensdorff-Pouilly S; Lettinga RG; Piek JM; Verheijen RH
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Jan; 22(1):107-14. PubMed ID: 21857347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer: laparoscopy versus laparotomy.
Taylor SE; McBee WC; Richard SD; Edwards RP
JSLS; 2011; 15(2):213-7. PubMed ID: 21902978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
Lowe MP; Chamberlain DH; Kamelle SA; Johnson PR; Tillmanns TD
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy and laparotomy in the treatment of Ib-IIa cervical cancer.
Li G; Yan X; Shang H; Wang G; Chen L; Han Y
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Apr; 105(1):176-80. PubMed ID: 17197013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.
Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early cervical adenocarcinoma].
Zhang YN; Li B; Wang YT; Liu SH
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Sep; 55(9):600-608. PubMed ID: 32957748
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of total laparoscopic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in surgical treatment of endometrial cancers.
Malinowski A; Majchrzak-Baczmańska D; Pogoda K; Maciołek-Blewniewska G; Antosiak B
Ginekol Pol; 2013 Mar; 84(3):197-205. PubMed ID: 23700847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Can laparoscopic radical hysterectomy be a standard surgical modality in stage IA2-IIA cervical cancer?
Hong JH; Choi JS; Lee JH; Eom JM; Ko JH; Bae JW; Park SH
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Oct; 127(1):102-6. PubMed ID: 22683586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis.
Medical Advisory Secretariat
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(27):1-118. PubMed ID: 23074405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Impact on survival and quality of life of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy to patients with early-stage cervical cancer].
Yang ZJ; Chen YL; Yao DS; Zhang JQ; Li F; Li L
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Nov; 46(11):854-9. PubMed ID: 22333237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical outcome and complications of laparoscopic surgery compared with traditional surgery in women with endometrial cancer.
Kuoppala T; Tomás E; Heinonen PK
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2004 Jul; 270(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 12728326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal versus radical abdominal hysterectomy type II in patients with cervical cancer.
Malur S; Possover M; Schneider A
Surg Endosc; 2001 Mar; 15(3):289-92. PubMed ID: 11344431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: our experience.
Malzoni M; Tinelli R; Cosentino F; Fusco A; Malzoni C
Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 May; 16(5):1316-23. PubMed ID: 19224286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficacy and safety outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy in Chinese older women with cervical cancer compared with laparoscopic radical hysterectomy.
Luo C; Liu M; Li X
BMC Womens Health; 2018 May; 18(1):61. PubMed ID: 29716555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative evaluation of surgical stress of laparoscopically assisted vaginal radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy and laparotomy for early-stage cervical cancer.
Hou CY; Li XL; Jiang F; Gong RJ; Guo XY; Yao YQ
Oncol Lett; 2011 Jul; 2(4):747-752. PubMed ID: 22848260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
