195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24995809)
1. Immediate nonfunctional versus immediate functional loading and dental implant failure rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chrcanovic BR; Albrektsson T; Wennerberg A
J Dent; 2014 Sep; 42(9):1052-9. PubMed ID: 24995809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Periodontally compromised vs. periodontally healthy patients and dental implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chrcanovic BR; Albrektsson T; Wennerberg A
J Dent; 2014 Dec; 42(12):1509-27. PubMed ID: 25283479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Tilted versus axially placed dental implants: a meta-analysis.
Chrcanovic BR; Albrektsson T; Wennerberg A
J Dent; 2015 Feb; 43(2):149-70. PubMed ID: 25239770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dental implants inserted in fresh extraction sockets versus healed sites: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chrcanovic BR; Albrektsson T; Wennerberg A
J Dent; 2015 Jan; 43(1):16-41. PubMed ID: 25433139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Immediately loaded non-submerged versus delayed loaded submerged dental implants: a meta-analysis.
Chrcanovic BR; Albrektsson T; Wennerberg A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Apr; 44(4):493-506. PubMed ID: 25541014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Immediate versus early loading of single dental implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Pigozzo MN; Rebelo da Costa T; Sesma N; Laganá DC
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 29703670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Platform switch and dental implants: A meta-analysis.
Chrcanovic BR; Albrektsson T; Wennerberg A
J Dent; 2015 Jun; 43(6):629-46. PubMed ID: 25559693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical efficacy of immediate implant loading protocols compared to conventional loading depending on the type of the restoration: a systematic review.
Sanz-Sánchez I; Sanz-Martín I; Figuero E; Sanz M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Aug; 26(8):964-982. PubMed ID: 24917174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evidence-Based Clinical Outcomes of Immediate and Early Loading of Short Endosseous Dental Implants: A Meta-analysis.
Kulkarni V; Uttamani JR; Asar NV; Nares S; Tözüm TF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 33600524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Annual failure rates and marginal bone-level changes of immediate compared to conventional loading of dental implants. A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis.
Engelhardt S; Papacosta P; Rathe F; Özen J; Jansen JA; Junker R
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Jun; 26(6):671-87. PubMed ID: 24628882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Five-year outcome of 111 immediate nonfunctional single restorations.
Degidi M; Piattelli A; Gehrke P; Felice P; Carinci F
J Oral Implantol; 2006; 32(6):277-85. PubMed ID: 17193929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of the timing of restoration on implant marginal bone loss: a systematic review.
Suarez F; Chan HL; Monje A; Galindo-Moreno P; Wang HL
J Periodontol; 2013 Feb; 84(2):159-69. PubMed ID: 22509755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of surgical and prosthetic techniques on marginal bone loss around titanium implants. Part I: immediate loading in fresh extraction sockets.
Berberi AN; Tehini GE; Noujeim ZF; Khairallah AA; Abousehlib MN; Salameh ZA
J Prosthodont; 2014 Oct; 23(7):521-7. PubMed ID: 24750449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Immediate versus early or conventional loading dental implants with fixed prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials.
Chen J; Cai M; Yang J; Aldhohrah T; Wang Y
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Dec; 122(6):516-536. PubMed ID: 31421892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Graftless Full-Arch Implant Rehabilitation with Interantral Implants and Immediate or Delayed Loading-Part II: Transition from the Failing Maxillary Dentition.
Busenlechner D; Mailath-Pokorny G; Haas R; Fürhauser R; Eder C; Pommer B; Watzek G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(5):1150-5. PubMed ID: 27632272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative analysis study of 702 dental implants subjected to immediate functional loading and immediate nonfunctional loading to traditional healing periods with a follow-up of up to 24 months.
Degidi M; Piattelli A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(1):99-107. PubMed ID: 15747680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Marginal bone loss one year after implantation: a systematic review of different loading protocols.
Sommer M; Zimmermann J; Grize L; Stübinger S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Jan; 49(1):121-134. PubMed ID: 31255443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Immediate versus early non-occlusal loading of dental implants placed flapless in partially edentulous patients: a 3-year randomized clinical trial.
Merli M; Moscatelli M; Mariotti G; Piemontese M; Nieri M
J Clin Periodontol; 2012 Feb; 39(2):196-202. PubMed ID: 22118014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of external and internal implant-abutment connections for implant supported prostheses. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lemos CAA; Verri FR; Bonfante EA; Santiago Júnior JF; Pellizzer EP
J Dent; 2018 Mar; 70():14-22. PubMed ID: 29221955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Crestal bone level changes around immediately placed implants: a systematic review and meta-analyses with at least 12 months' follow-up after functional loading.
Kinaia BM; Shah M; Neely AL; Goodis HE
J Periodontol; 2014 Nov; 85(11):1537-48. PubMed ID: 24794689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
