BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24996414)

  • 1. Maximum likelihood inference of small trees in the presence of long branches.
    Parks SL; Goldman N
    Syst Biol; 2014 Sep; 63(5):798-811. PubMed ID: 24996414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bayesian and maximum likelihood phylogenetic analyses of protein sequence data under relative branch-length differences and model violation.
    Mar JC; Harlow TJ; Ragan MA
    BMC Evol Biol; 2005 Jan; 5():8. PubMed ID: 15676079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long Branch Attraction Biases in Phylogenetics.
    Susko E; Roger AJ
    Syst Biol; 2021 Jun; 70(4):838-843. PubMed ID: 33528562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Large sample approximations of probabilities of correct evolutionary tree estimation and biases of maximum likelihood estimation.
    Susko E
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2011; 10():Article 10. PubMed ID: 21381435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Should we be worried about long-branch attraction in real data sets? Investigations using metazoan 18S rDNA.
    Anderson FE; Swofford DL
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2004 Nov; 33(2):440-51. PubMed ID: 15336677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An empirical assessment of long-branch attraction artefacts in deep eukaryotic phylogenomics.
    Brinkmann H; van der Giezen M; Zhou Y; Poncelin de Raucourt G; Philippe H
    Syst Biol; 2005 Oct; 54(5):743-57. PubMed ID: 16243762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long branch effects distort maximum likelihood phylogenies in simulations despite selection of the correct model.
    Kück P; Mayer C; Wägele JW; Misof B
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(5):e36593. PubMed ID: 22662120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A review of long-branch attraction.
    Bergsten J
    Cladistics; 2005 Apr; 21(2):163-193. PubMed ID: 34892859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Heterotachy and long-branch attraction in phylogenetics.
    Philippe H; Zhou Y; Brinkmann H; Rodrigue N; Delsuc F
    BMC Evol Biol; 2005 Oct; 5():50. PubMed ID: 16209710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Escaping from the Felsenstein zone by detecting long branches in phylogenetic data.
    Lyons-Weiler J; Hoelzer GA
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 1997 Dec; 8(3):375-84. PubMed ID: 9417895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The devil in the details: interactions between the branch-length prior and likelihood model affect node support and branch lengths in the phylogeny of the Psoraceae.
    Ekman S; Blaalid R
    Syst Biol; 2011 Jul; 60(4):541-61. PubMed ID: 21436107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. BEST-FIT MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD MODELS FOR PHYLOGENETIC INFERENCE: EMPIRICAL TESTS WITH KNOWN PHYLOGENIES.
    Cunningham CW; Zhu H; Hillis DM
    Evolution; 1998 Aug; 52(4):978-987. PubMed ID: 28565216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Utility of characters evolving at diverse rates of evolution to resolve quartet trees with unequal branch lengths: analytical predictions of long-branch effects.
    Su Z; Townsend JP
    BMC Evol Biol; 2015 May; 15():86. PubMed ID: 25968460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is it better to add taxa or characters to a difficult phylogenetic problem?
    Graybeal A
    Syst Biol; 1998 Mar; 47(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 12064243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Suppression of long-branch attraction artefacts in the animal phylogeny using a site-heterogeneous model.
    Lartillot N; Brinkmann H; Philippe H
    BMC Evol Biol; 2007 Feb; 7 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S4. PubMed ID: 17288577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. New patellogastropod mitogenomes help counteracting long-branch attraction in the deep phylogeny of gastropod mollusks.
    Uribe JE; Irisarri I; Templado J; Zardoya R
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2019 Apr; 133():12-23. PubMed ID: 30572020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-branch attraction bias and inconsistency in Bayesian phylogenetics.
    Kolaczkowski B; Thornton JW
    PLoS One; 2009 Dec; 4(12):e7891. PubMed ID: 20011052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony and likelihood methods.
    Yang Z
    J Mol Evol; 1996 Feb; 42(2):294-307. PubMed ID: 8919881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Theoretical and Practical Considerations when using Retroelement Insertions to Estimate Species Trees in the Anomaly Zone.
    Molloy EK; Gatesy J; Springer MS
    Syst Biol; 2022 Apr; 71(3):721-740. PubMed ID: 34677617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The gene tree delusion.
    Springer MS; Gatesy J
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2016 Jan; 94(Pt A):1-33. PubMed ID: 26238460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.