404 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24996498)
1. Hysterosalpingo-foam sonography, a less painful procedure for tubal patency testing during fertility workup compared with (serial) hysterosalpingography: a randomized controlled trial.
Dreyer K; Out R; Hompes PG; Mijatovic V
Fertil Steril; 2014 Sep; 102(3):821-5. PubMed ID: 24996498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The FOAM study: is Hysterosalpingo foam sonography (HyFoSy) a cost-effective alternative for hysterosalpingography (HSG) in assessing tubal patency in subfertile women? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
van Rijswijk J; van Welie N; Dreyer K; van Hooff MHA; de Bruin JP; Verhoeve HR; Mol F; Kleiman-Broeze KA; Traas MAF; Muijsers GJJM; Manger AP; Gianotten J; de Koning CH; Koning AMH; Bayram N; van der Ham DP; Vrouenraets FPJM; Kalafusova M; van de Laar BIG; Kaijser J; van Oostwaard MF; Meijer WJ; Broekmans FJM; Valkenburg O; van der Voet LF; van Disseldorp J; Lambers MJ; Peters HE; Lier MCI; Lambalk CB; van Wely M; Bossuyt PMM; Stoker J; van der Veen F; Mol BWJ; Mijatovic V
BMC Womens Health; 2018 May; 18(1):64. PubMed ID: 29743106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hysterosalpingo-foam sonography versus hysterosalpingography during fertility work-up: an economic evaluation alongside a randomized controlled trial.
Kamphuis D; van Eekelen R; van Welie N; Dreyer K; van Rijswijk J; van Hooff MHA; de Bruin JP; Verhoeve HR; Mol F; van Baal WM; Traas MAF; van Peperstraten AM; Manger AP; Gianotten J; de Koning CH; Koning AMH; Bayram N; van der Ham DP; Vrouenraets FPJM; Kalafusova M; van de Laar BIG; Kaijser J; Lambeek AF; Meijer WJ; Broekmans FJM; Valkenburg O; van der Voet LF; van Disseldorp J; Lambers MJ; Tros R; Lambalk CB; Stoker J; van Wely M; Bossuyt PMM; Mol BWJ; Mijatovic V
Hum Reprod; 2024 Jun; 39(6):1222-1230. PubMed ID: 38600625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Can hysterosalpingo-foam sonography replace hysterosalpingography as first-choice tubal patency test? A randomized non-inferiority trial.
van Welie N; van Rijswijk J; Dreyer K; van Hooff MHA; de Bruin JP; Verhoeve HR; Mol F; van Baal WM; Traas MAF; van Peperstraten AM; Manger AP; Gianotten J; de Koning CH; Koning AMH; Bayram N; van der Ham DP; Vrouenraets FPJM; Kalafusova M; van de Laar BIG; Kaijser J; Lambeek AF; Meijer WJ; Broekmans FJM; Valkenburg O; van der Voet LF; van Disseldorp J; Lambers MJ; Tros R; Lambalk CB; Stoker J; van Wely M; Bossuyt PMM; Mol BWJ; Mijatovic V
Hum Reprod; 2022 May; 37(5):969-979. PubMed ID: 35220432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pain during Fallopian-tube patency testing by hysterosalpingo-foam sonography.
Van Schoubroeck D; Van den Bosch T; Ameye L; Boes AS; D'Hooghe T; Timmerman D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Mar; 45(3):346-50. PubMed ID: 25092501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. First experiences with hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy) for office tubal patency testing.
Emanuel MH; van Vliet M; Weber M; Exalto N
Hum Reprod; 2012 Jan; 27(1):114-7. PubMed ID: 22064649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The use of a new gel foam for the evaluation of tubal patency.
Van Schoubroeck D; Van den Bosch T; Meuleman C; Tomassetti C; D'Hooghe T; Timmerman D
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2013; 75(3):152-6. PubMed ID: 23296258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Feasibility, tolerability, and safety of hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (hyfosy). multicenter, prospective Spanish study.
Engels V; Medina M; Antolín E; Ros C; Amaro A; De-Guirior C; Manzour N; Sotillo L; De la Cuesta R; Rodríguez R; San-Frutos L; Peralta S; Martin-Martínez A; Alcázar JL
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2021 May; 50(5):102004. PubMed ID: 33242678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. One-step transvaginal three-dimensional hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (3D-HyFoSy) confirmation test for Essure® follow-up: a multicenter study.
Zizolfi B; Lazzeri L; Franchini M; Di Spiezio Sardo A; Nappi C; Piccione E; Exacoustos C
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 51(1):134-141. PubMed ID: 28067009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography versus radiographic hysterosalpingography in the evaluation of tubal patency.
Hamed HO; Shahin AY; Elsamman AM
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2009 Jun; 105(3):215-7. PubMed ID: 19339010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Three-Dimensional Hysterosalpingo Contrast Sonography with Gel Foam: Methodology and Feasibility to Obtain 3-Dimensional Volumes of Tubal Shape.
Exacoustos C; Pizzo A; Lazzeri L; Pietropolli A; Piccione E; Zupi E
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(5):827-832. PubMed ID: 28450252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic Accuracy Study Comparing Hysterosalpingo-Foam Sonography and Hysterosalpingography for Fallopian Tube Patency Assessment.
Ramos J; Caligara C; Santamaría-López E; González-Ravina C; Prados N; Carranza F; Blasco V; Fernández-Sánchez M
J Clin Med; 2021 Sep; 10(18):. PubMed ID: 34575278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy): a new technique to visualize tubal patency.
Emanuel MH; Exalto N
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Apr; 37(4):498-9. PubMed ID: 21433170
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical Aspects of HyFoSy as Tubal Patency Test in Subfertility Workup.
Exalto N; Emanuel MH
Biomed Res Int; 2019; 2019():4827376. PubMed ID: 31360713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic accuracy of hysterosalpingo-foam-sonography to confirm tubal occlusion after Essure® placement as treatment for hydrosalpinges.
Dreyer K; Hompes PG; Mijatovic V
Reprod Biomed Online; 2015 Apr; 30(4):421-5. PubMed ID: 25682307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy) more tolerable in terms of pain and anxiety than hysterosalpingography (HSG)? A prospective real-world setting multicentre study.
Serrano González L; Pérez-Medina T; Bueno Olalla B; Royuela A; De La Cuesta MLR; Saéz de la Mata D; Domínguez-Franjo E; Calles-Sastre L; Engels V
BMC Womens Health; 2022 Feb; 22(1):41. PubMed ID: 35152893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sonohysterosalpingography: Comparison of foam and saline solution.
Piccioni MG; Riganelli L; Filippi V; Fuggetta E; Colagiovanni V; Imperiale L; Caccetta J; Panici PB; Porpora MG
J Clin Ultrasound; 2017 Feb; 45(2):67-71. PubMed ID: 27753111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of hysterosalpingo-foam sonography in comparison to hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography with air/saline and to laparoscopy with dye.
Ludwin I; Ludwin A; Wiechec M; Nocun A; Banas T; Basta P; Pitynski K
Hum Reprod; 2017 Apr; 32(4):758-769. PubMed ID: 28184447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Live birth after additional tubal flushing with oil-based contrast versus no additional flushing: a randomised, multicentre, parallel-group pragmatic trial in infertile women with at least one patent tube at hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HYFOIL study).
De Neubourg D; Janssens L; Verhaegen I; Smits E; Mol BW; Roelant E
BMJ Open; 2021 Nov; 11(11):e054845. PubMed ID: 34845077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the pain experienced by infertile women undergoing hysterosalpingo contrast sonography or radiographic hysterosalpingography.
Socolov D; Boian I; Boiculese L; Tamba B; Anghelache-Lupascu I; Socolov R
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2010 Dec; 111(3):256-9. PubMed ID: 20850745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
