These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24996898)

  • 1. Does McNemar's test compare the sensitivities and specificities of two diagnostic tests?
    Kim S; Lee W
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Feb; 26(1):142-154. PubMed ID: 24996898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Joint comparison of the predictive values of multiple binary diagnostic tests: an extension of McNemar's test.
    Wu Y
    J Biopharm Stat; 2023 Jan; 33(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 35576934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Weighted McNemar's test for the comparison of two screening tests in the presence of verification bias.
    Wu Y
    Stat Med; 2022 Jul; 41(16):3149-3163. PubMed ID: 35428039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the sample size for one-sided equivalence of sensitivities based upon McNemar's test.
    Lu Y; Bean JA
    Stat Med; 1995 Aug; 14(16):1831-9. PubMed ID: 7481214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The validity and power of tests for equality of two correlated proportions.
    May WL; Johnson WD
    Stat Med; 1997 May; 16(10):1081-96. PubMed ID: 9179976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparisons of predictive values of binary medical diagnostic tests for paired designs.
    Leisenring W; Alonzo T; Pepe MS
    Biometrics; 2000 Jun; 56(2):345-51. PubMed ID: 10877288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sample size calculation for comparing two screening tests when the gold standard is missing at random.
    Wu Y
    Stat Med; 2024 Jul; 43(15):2944-2956. PubMed ID: 38747112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Exact unconditional tests for a 2 x 2 matched-pairs design.
    Berger RL; Sidik K
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2003 Mar; 12(2):91-108. PubMed ID: 12665205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Understanding the effects of conditional dependence in research studies involving imperfect diagnostic tests.
    Wang Z; Dendukuri N; Joseph L
    Stat Med; 2017 Feb; 36(3):466-480. PubMed ID: 27730659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The conditional relative odds ratio provided less biased results for comparing diagnostic test accuracy in meta-analyses.
    Suzuki S; Moro-oka T; Choudhry NK
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 May; 57(5):461-9. PubMed ID: 15196616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing screening tests: extensions of McNemar's test.
    Lachenbruch PA; Lynch CJ
    Stat Med; 1998 Oct; 17(19):2207-17. PubMed ID: 9802179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies with multiple thresholds using survival methods.
    Putter H; Fiocco M; Stijnen T
    Biom J; 2010 Feb; 52(1):95-110. PubMed ID: 19924701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conditional relative odds ratio and comparison of accuracy of diagnostic tests based on 2 x 2 tables.
    Suzuki S
    J Epidemiol; 2006 Jul; 16(4):145-53. PubMed ID: 16837765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Power calculation of adjusted McNemar's test based on clustered data of varying cluster size.
    Wu Y
    Biom J; 2018 Nov; 60(6):1190-1200. PubMed ID: 30288765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Biplot as a diagnostic tool of local dependence in latent class models. A medical application.
    Sepúlveda R; Vicente-Villardón JL; Galindo MP
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(11):1855-69. PubMed ID: 18265437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the likelihood ratios of two binary diagnostic tests in paired designs.
    Nofuentes JA; Del Castillo Jde D
    Stat Med; 2007 Sep; 26(22):4179-201. PubMed ID: 17357992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Insights into latent class analysis of diagnostic test performance.
    Pepe MS; Janes H
    Biostatistics; 2007 Apr; 8(2):474-84. PubMed ID: 17085745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sample size and power for McNemar's test with clustered data.
    Gönen M
    Stat Med; 2004 Jul; 23(14):2283-94. PubMed ID: 15236431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies accounting for disease prevalence: alternative parameterizations and model selection.
    Chu H; Nie L; Cole SR; Poole C
    Stat Med; 2009 Aug; 28(18):2384-99. PubMed ID: 19499551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Efficient statistical tests to compare Youden index: accounting for contingency correlation.
    Chen F; Xue Y; Tan MT; Chen P
    Stat Med; 2015 Apr; 34(9):1560-76. PubMed ID: 25640747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.