200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24997025)
1. Magnetic resonance imaging artefacts and fixed orthodontic attachments.
Beau A; Bossard D; Gebeile-Chauty S
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Feb; 37(1):105-10. PubMed ID: 24997025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Magnetic resonance imaging artefacts and fixed orthodontic attachments].
Beau A; Bossard D; Gebeile-Chauty S
Orthod Fr; 2017 Jun; 88(2):131-138. PubMed ID: 28597834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of orthodontic brackets and permanent retainers on the diagnostic image quality of MRI scans: A preliminary study.
Neela PK; Tatikonda VK; Syed MW; Mamillapalli PK; Sesham VM; Keesara S
Dent Med Probl; 2021; 58(4):499-508. PubMed ID: 34905303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of a common stainless steel orthodontic bracket on the diagnostic quality of cranial and cervical 3T- MR images: a prospective, case-control study.
Cassetta M; Pranno N; Stasolla A; Orsogna N; Fierro D; Cavallini C; Cantisani V
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2017 Aug; 46(6):20170051. PubMed ID: 28452576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of orthodontic appliances on the quality of craniofacial anatomical magnetic resonance imaging and real-time speech imaging.
Wylezinska M; Pinkstone M; Hay N; Scott AD; Birch MJ; Miquel ME
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Dec; 37(6):610-7. PubMed ID: 25667040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of frictional forces between ceramic brackets and archwires of different alloys compared with metal brackets.
Guerrero AP; Guariza Filho O; Tanaka O; Camargo ES; Vieira S
Braz Oral Res; 2010; 24(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 20339712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of friction between ceramic brackets and orthodontic wires of four alloys.
Angolkar PV; Kapila S; Duncanson MG; Nanda RS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Dec; 98(6):499-506. PubMed ID: 2248227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Frictional resistances of different bracket-wire combinations.
Kapur Wadhwa R; Kwon HK; Close JM
Aust Orthod J; 2004 May; 20(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 15233584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of orthodontic appliances on the diagnostic capability of magnetic resonance imaging in the head and neck region: A systematic review.
Hasanin M; Kaplan SEF; Hohlen B; Lai C; Nagshabandi R; Zhu X; Al-Jewair T
Int Orthod; 2019 Sep; 17(3):403-414. PubMed ID: 31285157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Magnetic permeability as a predictor of the artefact size caused by orthodontic appliances at 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging.
Blankenstein FH; Asbach P; Beuer F; Glienke J; Mayer S; Zachriat C
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Jan; 21(1):281-289. PubMed ID: 26984824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the effect of bracket and archwire composition on frictional forces in the buccal segments.
Nair SV; Padmanabhan R; Janardhanam P
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 22945710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative evaluation of frictional forces in active and passive self-ligating brackets with various archwire alloys.
Krishnan M; Kalathil S; Abraham KM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Nov; 136(5):675-82. PubMed ID: 19892284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Frictional resistances using Teflon-coated ligatures with various bracket-archwire combinations.
De Franco DJ; Spiller RE; von Fraunhofer JA
Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(1):63-72; discussion 73-4. PubMed ID: 7726464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of ceramic and stainless steel brackets on the notching of archwires during clinical treatment.
Articolo LC; Kusy K; Saunders CR; Kusy RP
Eur J Orthod; 2000 Aug; 22(4):409-25. PubMed ID: 11029830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of Different Bracket's Resistance to Torsional Forces from Archwire.
Khanapure CC; Ayesha S; Sam G; Kumar VJ; Deepika C; Ahmed H
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Jul; 17(7):564-7. PubMed ID: 27595723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of common orthodontic appliances on the diagnostic quality of cranial magnetic resonance images.
Elison JM; Leggitt VL; Thomson M; Oyoyo U; Wycliffe ND
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Oct; 134(4):563-72. PubMed ID: 18929275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An in vitro investigation on friction generated by ceramic brackets.
Tecco S; Teté S; Festa M; Festa F
World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):e133-44. PubMed ID: 21490982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of orthodontic appliances on the diagnostic quality of magnetic resonance images of the head.
Zhylich D; Krishnan P; Muthusami P; Rayner T; Shroff M; Doria A; Tompson B; Lou W; Suri S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Mar; 151(3):484-499. PubMed ID: 28257733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of orthodontic brackets and different wires on radiofrequency heating and magnetic field interactions during 3-T MRI.
Görgülü S; Ayyildiz S; Kamburoglu K; Gökçe S; Ozen T
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2014; 43(2):20130356. PubMed ID: 24257741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of friction between edgewise stainless steel brackets and orthodontic wires of four alloys.
Kapila S; Angolkar PV; Duncanson MG; Nanda RS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Aug; 98(2):117-26. PubMed ID: 2378317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
