These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24997208)

  • 41. Choice of effect measure for meta-analyses of dichotomous outcomes influenced the identified heterogeneity and direction of small-study effects.
    Papageorgiou SN; Tsiranidou E; Antonoglou GN; Deschner J; Jäger A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 May; 68(5):534-41. PubMed ID: 25666885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in simulated random-effects meta-analyses.
    Langan D; Higgins JPT; Jackson D; Bowden J; Veroniki AA; Kontopantelis E; Viechtbauer W; Simmonds M
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Mar; 10(1):83-98. PubMed ID: 30067315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Commentary for history special issue of Research Synthesis Methods.
    Chalmers I
    Res Synth Methods; 2015 Sep; 6(3):268-71. PubMed ID: 26097220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Interpretation of data from multiple trials: a critical review.
    Conn HO
    J Intern Med; 1997 Mar; 241(3):177-83. PubMed ID: 9104430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Key concepts in clinical epidemiology: detecting and dealing with heterogeneity in meta-analyses.
    Cordero CP; Dans AL
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Feb; 130():149-151. PubMed ID: 33483004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Meta-analysis as a tool for gaining knowledge].
    Koch A; Ziegler S
    Med Klin (Munich); 2000 May; 95(1 Spec No):83-90. PubMed ID: 10851854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Meta-analysis as a tool for evaluation of evidence].
    Koch A; Ziegler S
    Med Klin (Munich); 2000 Feb; 95(2):109-16. PubMed ID: 10714131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Commentary: The debate on non-inferiority trials: 'when meta-analysis alone is not helpful'.
    Liberati A; D'Amico R
    Int J Epidemiol; 2010 Dec; 39(6):1582-3. PubMed ID: 21113051
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Meta- and statistical analysis of single-case intervention research data: quantitative gifts and a wish list.
    Kratochwill TR; Levin JR
    J Sch Psychol; 2014 Apr; 52(2):231-5. PubMed ID: 24606977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Credibility of subgroup findings in clinical trials and meta-analyses.
    Myles P; Kasza J; Turner T
    Br J Anaesth; 2021 Jul; 127(1):11-14. PubMed ID: 33992396
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Statistical primer: methodology and reporting of meta-analyses.
    Buccheri S; Sodeck GH; Capodanno D
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2018 Apr; 53(4):708-713. PubMed ID: 29538746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Meta-analyses based on individual patient data (IPD)].
    Bekkering GE; Cools F; Aertgeerts B; de Backer TL; Kellen E; van der Stichele RH; Buntinx F
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2009 Feb; 153(9):402-6. PubMed ID: 19348098
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. HELOW: a program for testing extreme homogeneity in meta-analysis.
    Zintzaras E; Ioannidis JP
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2014 Nov; 117(2):383-6. PubMed ID: 25023534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Misleading funnel plot for detection of bias in meta-analysis.
    Tang JL; Liu JL
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2000 May; 53(5):477-84. PubMed ID: 10812319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Getting more out of meta-analyses: a new approach to meta-analysis in light of unexplained heterogeneity.
    Saad A; Yekutieli D; Lev-Ran S; Gross R; Guyatt G
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Mar; 107():101-106. PubMed ID: 30529650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Assessing the amount of heterogeneity in random-effects meta-analysis.
    Knapp G; Biggerstaff BJ; Hartung J
    Biom J; 2006 Apr; 48(2):271-85. PubMed ID: 16708778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Understanding the Basics of Meta-Analysis and How to Read a Forest Plot: As Simple as It Gets.
    Andrade C
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2020 Oct; 81(5):. PubMed ID: 33027562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Sequential methods for random-effects meta-analysis.
    Higgins JP; Whitehead A; Simmonds M
    Stat Med; 2011 Apr; 30(9):903-21. PubMed ID: 21472757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Heterogeneity in ecological and evolutionary meta-analyses: its magnitude and implications.
    Senior AM; Grueber CE; Kamiya T; Lagisz M; O'Dwyer K; Santos ES; Nakagawa S
    Ecology; 2016 Dec; 97(12):3293-3299. PubMed ID: 27912008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Meta-analysis methods for genome-wide association studies and beyond.
    Evangelou E; Ioannidis JP
    Nat Rev Genet; 2013 Jun; 14(6):379-89. PubMed ID: 23657481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.