188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24997668)
1. Assigning unknown parent groups to reduce bias in genomic evaluations of final score in US Holsteins.
Tsuruta S; Misztal I; Lourenco DA; Lawlor TJ
J Dairy Sci; 2014 Sep; 97(9):5814-21. PubMed ID: 24997668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Controlling bias in genomic breeding values for young genotyped bulls.
Tsuruta S; Lourenco DAL; Masuda Y; Misztal I; Lawlor TJ
J Dairy Sci; 2019 Nov; 102(11):9956-9970. PubMed ID: 31495630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Genomic predictions for yield traits in US Holsteins with unknown parent groups.
Cesarani A; Masuda Y; Tsuruta S; Nicolazzi EL; VanRaden PM; Lourenco D; Misztal I
J Dairy Sci; 2021 May; 104(5):5843-5853. PubMed ID: 33663836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Short communication: genomic evaluations of final score for US Holsteins benefit from the inclusion of genotypes on cows.
Tsuruta S; Misztal I; Lawlor TJ
J Dairy Sci; 2013 May; 96(5):3332-5. PubMed ID: 23477821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Application of single-step single nucleotide polymorphism best linear unbiased predictor model with unknown-parent groups for type traits in Japanese Holsteins.
Osawa T; Masuda Y; Saburi J; Hirumachi K
J Dairy Sci; 2023 Jul; 106(7):4847-4859. PubMed ID: 37268563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Invited review: Unknown-parent groups and metafounders in single-step genomic BLUP.
Masuda Y; VanRaden PM; Tsuruta S; Lourenco DAL; Misztal I
J Dairy Sci; 2022 Feb; 105(2):923-939. PubMed ID: 34799109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Application of genomic evaluation to dairy cattle in New Zealand.
Winkelman AM; Johnson DL; Harris BL
J Dairy Sci; 2015 Jan; 98(1):659-75. PubMed ID: 25468702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Are evaluations on young genotyped animals benefiting from the past generations?
Lourenco DA; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Aguilar I; Lawlor TJ; Forni S; Weller JI
J Dairy Sci; 2014; 97(6):3930-42. PubMed ID: 24679931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Genomic evaluation of a relatively small dairy cattle population by combination with a larger population.
Weller JI; Stoop WM; Eding H; Schrooten C; Ezra E
J Dairy Sci; 2015 Jul; 98(7):4945-55. PubMed ID: 25935250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development of genomic predictions for Angus cattle in Brazil incorporating genotypes from related American sires.
Campos GS; Cardoso FF; Gomes CCG; Domingues R; de Almeida Regitano LC; de Sena Oliveira MC; de Oliveira HN; Carvalheiro R; Albuquerque LG; Miller S; Misztal I; Lourenco D
J Anim Sci; 2022 Feb; 100(2):. PubMed ID: 35031806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Single-step genomic model improved reliability and reduced the bias of genomic predictions in Danish Jersey.
Ma P; Lund MS; Nielsen US; Aamand GP; Su G
J Dairy Sci; 2015 Dec; 98(12):9026-34. PubMed ID: 26433415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Application of single-step genomic evaluation using multiple-trait random regression test-day models in dairy cattle.
Oliveira HR; Lourenco DAL; Masuda Y; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Jamrozik J; Brito LF; Silva FF; Schenkel FS
J Dairy Sci; 2019 Mar; 102(3):2365-2377. PubMed ID: 30638992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges.
Hayes BJ; Bowman PJ; Chamberlain AJ; Goddard ME
J Dairy Sci; 2009 Feb; 92(2):433-43. PubMed ID: 19164653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differing genetic trend estimates from traditional and genomic evaluations of genotyped animals as evidence of preselection bias in US Holsteins.
Masuda Y; VanRaden PM; Misztal I; Lawlor TJ
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Jun; 101(6):5194-5206. PubMed ID: 29573806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Modeling missing pedigree with metafounders and validating single-step genomic predictions in a small dairy cattle population with a great influence of foreign genetics.
López-Correa RD; Legarra A; Aguilar I
J Dairy Sci; 2024 Jul; 107(7):4685-4692. PubMed ID: 38310956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A simple method for genomic selection of moderately sized dairy cattle populations.
Weller JI; Ron M; Glick G; Shirak A; Zeron Y; Ezra E
Animal; 2012 Feb; 6(2):193-202. PubMed ID: 22436176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hot topic: a unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information for genetic evaluation of Holstein final score.
Aguilar I; Misztal I; Johnson DL; Legarra A; Tsuruta S; Lawlor TJ
J Dairy Sci; 2010 Feb; 93(2):743-52. PubMed ID: 20105546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimation of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in a multibreed cattle population.
Khansefid M; Pryce JE; Bolormaa S; Miller SP; Wang Z; Li C; Goddard ME
J Anim Sci; 2014 Aug; 92(8):3270-83. PubMed ID: 25074450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Metafounder approach for single-step genomic evaluations of Red Dairy cattle.
Kudinov AA; Mäntysaari EA; Aamand GP; Uimari P; Strandén I
J Dairy Sci; 2020 Jul; 103(7):6299-6310. PubMed ID: 32418688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Implementation of genomic recursions in single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor for US Holsteins with a large number of genotyped animals.
Masuda Y; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Legarra A; Aguilar I; Lourenco DAL; Fragomeni BO; Lawlor TJ
J Dairy Sci; 2016 Mar; 99(3):1968-1974. PubMed ID: 26805987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
