188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24997668)
21. Predictive ability of selected subsets of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in a moderately sized dairy cattle population.
Weller JI; Glick G; Shirak A; Ezra E; Seroussi E; Shemesh M; Zeron Y; Ron M
Animal; 2014 Feb; 8(2):208-16. PubMed ID: 24433958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Genomic prediction of milk-production traits and somatic cell score using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor with random regression test-day model in Thai dairy cattle.
Buaban S; Prempree S; Sumreddee P; Duangjinda M; Masuda Y
J Dairy Sci; 2021 Dec; 104(12):12713-12723. PubMed ID: 34538484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Accuracy of genomic prediction for milk production traits in the Chinese Holstein population using a reference population consisting of cows.
Ding X; Zhang Z; Li X; Wang S; Wu X; Sun D; Yu Y; Liu J; Wang Y; Zhang Y; Zhang S; Zhang Y; Zhang Q
J Dairy Sci; 2013 Aug; 96(8):5315-23. PubMed ID: 23746588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Changes in genomic predictions when new information is added.
Hidalgo J; Lourenco D; Tsuruta S; Masuda Y; Miller S; Bermann M; Garcia ALS; Misztal I
J Anim Sci; 2021 Feb; 99(2):. PubMed ID: 33544869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Genomic prediction for Nordic Red Cattle using one-step and selection index blending.
Su G; Madsen P; Nielsen US; Mäntysaari EA; Aamand GP; Christensen OF; Lund MS
J Dairy Sci; 2012 Feb; 95(2):909-17. PubMed ID: 22281355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Short communication: Use of young bulls in the United States.
Hutchison JL; Cole JB; Bickhart DM
J Dairy Sci; 2014 May; 97(5):3213-20. PubMed ID: 24612804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Reducing bias in the dairy cattle single-step genomic evaluation by ignoring bulls without progeny.
Koivula M; Strandén I; Aamand GP; Mäntysaari EA
J Anim Breed Genet; 2018 Apr; 135(2):107-115. PubMed ID: 29484731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Multiple-trait genomic evaluation of linear type traits using genomic and phenotypic data in US Holsteins.
Tsuruta S; Misztal I; Aguilar I; Lawlor TJ
J Dairy Sci; 2011 Aug; 94(8):4198-204. PubMed ID: 21787955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of genomic predictions for lowly heritable traits using multi-step and single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in Holstein cattle.
Guarini AR; Lourenco DAL; Brito LF; Sargolzaei M; Baes CF; Miglior F; Misztal I; Schenkel FS
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Sep; 101(9):8076-8086. PubMed ID: 29935829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Bayesian single-step genomic evaluations combining local and foreign information in Walloon Holsteins.
Colinet FG; Vandenplas J; Vanderick S; Hammami H; Mota RR; Gillon A; Hubin X; Bertozzi C; Gengler N
Animal; 2018 May; 12(5):898-905. PubMed ID: 29032781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Genomic analysis of cow mortality and milk production using a threshold-linear model.
Tsuruta S; Lourenco DAL; Misztal I; Lawlor TJ
J Dairy Sci; 2017 Sep; 100(9):7295-7305. PubMed ID: 28647327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Multibreed genomic evaluation for production traits of dairy cattle in the United States using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor.
Cesarani A; Lourenco D; Tsuruta S; Legarra A; Nicolazzi EL; VanRaden PM; Misztal I
J Dairy Sci; 2022 Jun; 105(6):5141-5152. PubMed ID: 35282922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Modeling missing pedigree in single-step genomic BLUP.
Bradford HL; Masuda Y; VanRaden PM; Legarra A; Misztal I
J Dairy Sci; 2019 Mar; 102(3):2336-2346. PubMed ID: 30638995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Improving accuracy of genomic predictions within and between dairy cattle breeds with imputed high-density single nucleotide polymorphism panels.
Erbe M; Hayes BJ; Matukumalli LK; Goswami S; Bowman PJ; Reich CM; Mason BA; Goddard ME
J Dairy Sci; 2012 Jul; 95(7):4114-29. PubMed ID: 22720968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Preliminary investigation on reliability of genomic estimated breeding values in the Danish Holstein population.
Su G; Guldbrandtsen B; Gregersen VR; Lund MS
J Dairy Sci; 2010 Mar; 93(3):1175-83. PubMed ID: 20172238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Including different groups of genotyped females for genomic prediction in a Nordic Jersey population.
Gao H; Madsen P; Nielsen US; Aamand GP; Su G; Byskov K; Jensen J
J Dairy Sci; 2015 Dec; 98(12):9051-9. PubMed ID: 26433419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Bias and accuracy of dairy sheep evaluations using BLUP and SSGBLUP with metafounders and unknown parent groups.
Macedo FL; Christensen OF; Astruc JM; Aguilar I; Masuda Y; Legarra A
Genet Sel Evol; 2020 Aug; 52(1):47. PubMed ID: 32787772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Domestic estimated breeding values and genomic enhanced breeding values of bulls in comparison with their foreign genomic enhanced breeding values.
Přibyl J; Bauer J; Čermák V; Pešek P; Přibylová J; Šplíchal J; Vostrá-Vydrová H; Vostrý L; Zavadilová L
Animal; 2015 Oct; 9(10):1635-42. PubMed ID: 26133272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Genomic evaluation of Brown Swiss dairy cattle with limited national genotype data and integrated external information.
Luštrek B; Vandenplas J; Gorjanc G; Potočnik K
J Dairy Sci; 2021 May; 104(5):5738-5754. PubMed ID: 33685705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Accuracy of Igenity genomically estimated breeding values for predicting Australian Angus BREEDPLAN traits.
Boerner V; Johnston D; Wu XL; Bauck S
J Anim Sci; 2015 Feb; 93(2):513-21. PubMed ID: 25549982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
