These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24997758)

  • 1. Adnexal masses: what is the role of ultrasonographic imaging?
    Coccia ME; Rizzello F; Romanelli C; Capezzuoli T
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Nov; 290(5):843-54. PubMed ID: 24997758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Simple ultrasound rules to distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal masses before surgery: prospective validation by IOTA group.
    Timmerman D; Ameye L; Fischerova D; Epstein E; Melis GB; Guerriero S; Van Holsbeke C; Savelli L; Fruscio R; Lissoni AA; Testa AC; Veldman J; Vergote I; Van Huffel S; Bourne T; Valentin L
    BMJ; 2010 Dec; 341():c6839. PubMed ID: 21156740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adding a single CA 125 measurement to ultrasound imaging performed by an experienced examiner does not improve preoperative discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
    Valentin L; Jurkovic D; Van Calster B; Testa A; Van Holsbeke C; Bourne T; Vergote I; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Sep; 34(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 19585547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Imaging techniques for the pre-surgical diagnosis of adnexal tumours.
    Kaijser J; Vandecaveye V; Deroose CM; Rockall A; Thomassin-Naggara I; Bourne T; Timmerman D
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2014 Jul; 28(5):683-95. PubMed ID: 24780415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adnexal masses: accuracy of detection and differentiation with multidetector computed tomography.
    Tsili AC; Tsampoulas C; Charisiadi A; Kalef-Ezra J; Dousias V; Paraskevaidis E; Efremidis SC
    Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Jul; 110(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 18486202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. External validation of IOTA simple descriptors and simple rules for classifying adnexal masses.
    Alcázar JL; Pascual MA; Graupera B; Aubá M; Errasti T; Olartecoechea B; Ruiz-Zambrana A; Hereter L; Ajossa S; Guerriero S
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Sep; 48(3):397-402. PubMed ID: 26748432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Imaging of Adnexal Masses.
    Thakur M; Timmerman D
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Mar; 60(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 28005597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance of three-dimensional power Doppler angiography as third-step assessment in differential diagnosis of adnexal masses.
    Utrilla-Layna J; Alcázar JL; Aubá M; Laparte C; Olartecoechea B; Errasti T; Juez L; Mínguez JÁ; Guerriero S; Jurado M
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May; 45(5):613-7. PubMed ID: 25270368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Imaging of benign adnexal masses: characteristic presentations on ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Heilbrun ME; Olpin J; Shaaban A
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar; 52(1):21-39. PubMed ID: 19179859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound in patients with adnexal masses.
    Sohaib SA; Mills TD; Sahdev A; Webb JA; Vantrappen PO; Jacobs IJ; Reznek RH
    Clin Radiol; 2005 Mar; 60(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 15710137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Classification of asymptomatic adnexal masses by ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography.
    Grab D; Flock F; Stöhr I; Nüssle K; Rieber A; Fenchel S; Brambs HJ; Reske SN; Kreienberg R
    Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Jun; 77(3):454-9. PubMed ID: 10831359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving the preoperative classification of adnexal masses as benign or malignant by second-stage tests.
    Daemen A; Valentin L; Fruscio R; Van Holsbeke C; Melis GB; Guerriero S; Czekierdowski A; Jurkovic D; Ombelet W; Rossi A; Vergote I; Bourne T; De Moor B; Timmerman D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jan; 37(1):100-6. PubMed ID: 20814878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correlation of pelvic magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis with pathology for indeterminate adnexal masses.
    Haggerty AF; Hagemann AR; Chu C; Siegelman ES; Rubin SC
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Sep; 24(7):1215-21. PubMed ID: 25153677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three-dimensional volume off-line analysis as compared to real-time ultrasound for assessing adnexal masses.
    Alcázar JL; Iturra A; Sedda F; Aubá M; Ajossa S; Guerriero S; Jurado M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Mar; 161(1):92-5. PubMed ID: 22197306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of different strategies to triage women with adnexal masses: a prospective study.
    Piovano E; Cavallero C; Fuso L; Viora E; Ferrero A; Gregori G; Grillo C; Macchi C; Mengozzi G; Mitidieri M; Pagano E; Zola P
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Sep; 50(3):395-403. PubMed ID: 27706929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of adnexal masses with three-dimensional ultrasonography.
    Geomini PM; Kluivers KB; Moret E; Bremer GL; Kruitwagen RF; Mol BW
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Nov; 108(5):1167-75. PubMed ID: 17077239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ultrasound-based logistic regression model LR2 versus magnetic resonance imaging for discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses: a prospective study.
    Shimada K; Matsumoto K; Mimura T; Ishikawa T; Munechika J; Ohgiya Y; Kushima M; Hirose Y; Asami Y; Iitsuka C; Miyamoto S; Onuki M; Tsunoda H; Matsuoka R; Ichizuka K; Sekizawa A
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2018 Jun; 23(3):514-521. PubMed ID: 29236181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ultrasound experience substantially impacts on diagnostic performance and confidence when adnexal masses are classified using pattern recognition.
    Van Holsbeke C; Daemen A; Yazbek J; Holland TK; Bourne T; Mesens T; Lannoo L; Boes AS; Joos A; Van De Vijver A; Roggen N; de Moor B; de Jonge E; Testa AC; Valentin L; Jurkovic D; Timmerman D
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2010; 69(3):160-8. PubMed ID: 20016188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adnexal masses difficult to classify as benign or malignant using subjective assessment of gray-scale and Doppler ultrasound findings: logistic regression models do not help.
    Valentin L; Ameye L; Savelli L; Fruscio R; Leone FP; Czekierdowski A; Lissoni AA; Fischerova D; Guerriero S; Van Holsbeke C; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Oct; 38(4):456-65. PubMed ID: 21520475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Lerner score, Doppler ultrasound examination, and their combination for discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
    Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Feb; 15(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 10775998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.