162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24998911)
1. Assessment of the soft tissue thickness at the lower anterior face in adult patients with different skeletal vertical patterns using cone-beam computed tomography.
Celikoglu M; Buyuk SK; Ekizer A; Sekerci AE; Sisman Y
Angle Orthod; 2015 Mar; 85(2):211-7. PubMed ID: 24998911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of the Facial Soft Tissue Thickness of the Patients Affected by Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography.
Celikoglu M; Buyuk SK; Sekerci AE
J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Jul; 26(5):1647-51. PubMed ID: 26114525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Facial soft-tissue thickness in patients affected by bilateral cleft lip and palate: a retrospective cone-beam computed tomography study.
Celikoglu M; Buyuk SK; Sekerci AE; Ersoz M; Celik S; Sisman Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Nov; 146(5):573-8. PubMed ID: 25439207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of pharyngeal airway volume among different vertical skeletal patterns: a cone-beam computed tomography study.
Celikoglu M; Bayram M; Sekerci AE; Buyuk SK; Toy E
Angle Orthod; 2014 Sep; 84(5):782-7. PubMed ID: 24592903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Soft tissue thickness in Brazilian adults of different skeletal classes and facial types: A cone beam CT - Study.
Farias Gomes A; Moreira DD; Zanon MF; Groppo FC; Haiter-Neto F; Freitas DQ
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2020 Nov; 47():101743. PubMed ID: 32659706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of maxillary sinus volume and dimensions in different vertical face growth patterns: a study of cone-beam computed tomography.
Okşayan R; Sökücü O; Yeşildal S
Acta Odontol Scand; 2017 Jul; 75(5):345-349. PubMed ID: 28376676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of Facial Soft Tissue Dimensions in Adult Patients with Different Sagittal Skeletal Classes using Cone beam Computed Tomography.
Jazmati HM; Ajaj MA; Hajeer MY
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Jul; 17(7):542-8. PubMed ID: 27595719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Longitudinal changes in the adult facial profile.
Formby WA; Nanda RS; Currier GF
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 May; 105(5):464-76. PubMed ID: 8166096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does skeletal surgery for asymmetric mandibular prognathism influence the soft tissue contour and thickness?
Lee ST; Mori Y; Minami K; An CH; Park JW; Kwon TG
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Sep; 71(9):1577-87. PubMed ID: 23800674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cone beam tomographic study of facial structures characteristics at rest and wide smile, and their correlation with the facial types.
Martins LF; Vigorito JW
Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(6):38-44. PubMed ID: 24351148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mandibular vertical asymmetry in adult orthodontic patients with different vertical growth patterns: A cone beam computed tomography study.
Celik S; Celikoglu M; Buyuk SK; Sekerci AE
Angle Orthod; 2016 Mar; 86(2):271-7. PubMed ID: 26065465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Orthodontic soft-tissue parameters: a comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and the 3dMD imaging system.
Metzger TE; Kula KS; Eckert GJ; Ghoneima AA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Nov; 144(5):672-81. PubMed ID: 24182583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of setback Le Fort I osteotomy on midfacial soft-tissue changes as evaluated by cone-beam computed tomography superimposition for cases of skeletal Class III malocclusion.
Lee JY; Kim YI; Hwang DS; Park SB
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jun; 42(6):790-5. PubMed ID: 23294855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative Evaluation of Soft Tissue Chin Thickness in Adult Patients with Skeletal Class II Malocclusion with Various Vertical Growth Patterns: a Cephalometric Study.
Patil HS; Golwalkar S; Chougule K; Kulkarni NR
Folia Med (Plovdiv); 2021 Feb; 63(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 33650399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-Dimensional Soft Tissue Assessment Following Mandibular Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy.
Al-Housami SA; Shawky M; El-Morsy K; Abdel-Ghany H
J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Nov; 26(8):e702-6. PubMed ID: 26594979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Differences in soft-tissue thickness changes after bimaxillary surgery between patients with vertically high angle and normal angle.
Choi SH; Lee H; Hwang JJ; Jung HD; Hwang CJ; Cha JY
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Jan; 159(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 33127204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison Of Soft Tissue Chin And Lower Lip Thickness In Adult Patients With Various Mandibular Divergence Patterns.
Farooq A; Afsar M; Khan VA; Shahnawaz A; Hafeez SD; Shad S; Afsar F
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2023; 35(2):226-230. PubMed ID: 37422810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Perioral soft tissue evaluation of skeletal Class II Division 1: A lateral cephalometric study.
Lee YJ; Park JT; Cha JY
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Sep; 148(3):405-13. PubMed ID: 26321338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Alveolar bone mapping in subjects with different vertical facial dimensions.
Sadek MM; Sabet NE; Hassan IT
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Apr; 37(2):194-201. PubMed ID: 25114124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Smile analysis in different facial patterns and its correlation with underlying hard tissues.
Grover N; Kapoor DN; Verma S; Bharadwaj P
Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():28. PubMed ID: 26341345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
