These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25000000)

  • 1. How to measure technology assessment: an introduction.
    Hasman A
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2014; 202():1-4. PubMed ID: 25000000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Health Information Technology Evaluation Framework (HITREF) Comprehensiveness as Assessed in Electronic Point-of-Care Documentation Systems Evaluations.
    Sockolow PS; Bowles KH; Rogers M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 216():406-9. PubMed ID: 26262081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of health information technology in saudi primary healthcare centers.
    Almaiman A; Bahkali S; Alfrih S; Househ M; El Metwally A
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2014; 202():209-12. PubMed ID: 25000053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical Computer Systems Survey (CLICS): learning about health information technology (HIT) in its context of use.
    Lichtner V; Cornford T; Klecun E
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 192():422-6. PubMed ID: 23920589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. User Expectations: Nurses' Perspective.
    Gürsel G
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 225():897-8. PubMed ID: 27332398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of Knowledge, Attitude, Practise and Adoption Among Health Care Professionals for Informatics/Computerised Technology Systems.
    Karthik K; Munuswamy S
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 225():997-8. PubMed ID: 27332450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Insights and limits of usability evaluation methods along the health information technology lifecycle.
    Marcilly R; Kushniruk AW; Beuscart-Zephir MC; Borycki EM
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 210():115-9. PubMed ID: 25991113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. 14 Years longitudinal evaluation of clinical information systems acceptance: The HEGP case.
    Hadji B; Martin G; Dupuis I; Campoy E; Degoulet P
    Int J Med Inform; 2016 Feb; 86():20-9. PubMed ID: 26725691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Towards Evidence Based Usability in Health Informatics?
    Marcilly R; Peute LW; Beuscart-Zephir MC; Jaspers MW
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 218():55-60. PubMed ID: 26262527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Determinants of continuance intention in a post-adoption satisfaction evaluation of a clinical information system.
    Hadji B; Dupuis I; Leneveut L; Heudes D; Wagner JF; Degoulet P
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2014; 205():990-4. PubMed ID: 25160336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of a Video Coding Scheme for Analyzing the Usability and Usefulness of Health Information Systems.
    Kushniruk AW; Borycki EM
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 218():68-73. PubMed ID: 26262529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Evaluation Imperative.
    Nagle LM
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 225():88-92. PubMed ID: 27332168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An Empirical Study on the Successful Implementation of Nursing Information System.
    Tsai HH; Chiou SF; Wang TC; Wu MP; Feng RC
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 225():846-7. PubMed ID: 27332372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Engaging in large-scale digital health technologies and services. What factors hinder recruitment?
    O'Connor S; Mair FS; McGee-Lennon M; Bouamrane MM; O'Donnell K
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 210():306-10. PubMed ID: 25991155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Disruptive technology roils the health care landscape.
    Iglehart JK
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2013 Aug; 32(8):1342. PubMed ID: 23918475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using Mixed Methods in Health Information Technology Evaluation.
    Sockolow P; Dowding D; Randell R; Favela J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 225():83-7. PubMed ID: 27332167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Health Information Systems: evaluation and performance of a Help Desk.
    Pintos L; Stieben A; Garcia G; Briatore A; Bertoia A; Benitez S; Giunta D; Baum A; Gonzalez Bernaldo de Quiros F
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 210():536-40. PubMed ID: 25991205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Health Informatics Competences for eHealth: What Can We Learn From a Bibliometric Analysis?
    Kokol P; Blažun H; Saranto K
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 216():1014. PubMed ID: 26262315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Healthcare professionals' use of health clouds: Integrating technology acceptance and status quo bias perspectives.
    Hsieh PJ
    Int J Med Inform; 2015 Jul; 84(7):512-23. PubMed ID: 25842155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of Thailand universal coverage scheme on the country's health information systems and health information technology.
    Kijsanayotin B
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 192():989. PubMed ID: 23920763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.