These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25000956)

  • 1. Self-assembly of the chaperonin GroEL nanocage induced at submicellar detergent.
    Chen J; Yagi H; Furutani Y; Nakamura T; Inaguma A; Guo H; Kong Y; Goto Y
    Sci Rep; 2014 Jul; 4():5614. PubMed ID: 25000956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do chaperonins boost protein yields by accelerating folding or preventing aggregation?
    Jewett AI; Shea JE
    Biophys J; 2008 Apr; 94(8):2987-93. PubMed ID: 18192377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Solubilization and delivery by GroEL of megadalton complexes of the lambda holin.
    Deaton J; Savva CG; Sun J; Holzenburg A; Berry J; Young R
    Protein Sci; 2004 Jul; 13(7):1778-86. PubMed ID: 15215521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Asymmetry of the GroEL-GroES complex under physiological conditions as revealed by small-angle x-ray scattering.
    Inobe T; Takahashi K; Maki K; Enoki S; Kamagata K; Kadooka A; Arai M; Kuwajima K
    Biophys J; 2008 Feb; 94(4):1392-402. PubMed ID: 17981896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. SDS-induced conformational changes and inactivation of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL.
    Li S; Wang LT; Zhou HM
    J Protein Chem; 1999 Aug; 18(6):653-7. PubMed ID: 10609640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Topology of the morphological domains of the chaperonin GroEL visualized by immuno-electron microscopy.
    Martin J; Goldie KN; Engel A; Hartl FU
    Biol Chem Hoppe Seyler; 1994 Sep; 375(9):635-9. PubMed ID: 7840907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A thermophilic mini-chaperonin contains a conserved polypeptide-binding surface: combined crystallographic and NMR studies of the GroEL apical domain with implications for substrate interactions.
    Hua Q; Dementieva IS; Walsh MA; Hallenga K; Weiss MA; Joachimiak A
    J Mol Biol; 2001 Feb; 306(3):513-25. PubMed ID: 11178910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An expanded protein folding cage in the GroEL-gp31 complex.
    Clare DK; Bakkes PJ; van Heerikhuizen H; van der Vies SM; Saibil HR
    J Mol Biol; 2006 May; 358(3):905-11. PubMed ID: 16549073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. TEM and STEM-EDS evaluation of metal nanoparticle encapsulation in GroEL/GroES complexes according to the reaction mechanism of chaperonin.
    Yoda H; Koike-Takeshita A
    Microscopy (Oxf); 2021 Jun; 70(3):289-296. PubMed ID: 33173948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The 13 angstroms structure of a chaperonin GroEL-protein substrate complex by cryo-electron microscopy.
    Falke S; Tama F; Brooks CL; Gogol EP; Fisher MT
    J Mol Biol; 2005 Apr; 348(1):219-30. PubMed ID: 15808865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Functional significance of symmetrical versus asymmetrical GroEL-GroES chaperonin complexes.
    Engel A; Hayer-Hartl MK; Goldie KN; Pfeifer G; Hegerl R; Müller S; da Silva AC; Baumeister W; Hartl FU
    Science; 1995 Aug; 269(5225):832-6. PubMed ID: 7638600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Gly192 at hinge 2 site in the chaperonin GroEL plays a pivotal role in the dynamic apical domain movement that leads to GroES binding and efficient encapsulation of substrate proteins.
    Machida K; Fujiwara R; Tanaka T; Sakane I; Hongo K; Mizobata T; Kawata Y
    Biochim Biophys Acta; 2009 Sep; 1794(9):1344-54. PubMed ID: 19130907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Ligand-Induced Reassembly of GroEL/ES Chaperone In Vitro: Visualization by Electron Microscopy].
    Ryabova NA; Selivanova OM; Semisotnov GV
    Mol Biol (Mosk); 2018; 52(1):120-124. PubMed ID: 29512644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A tubular biocontainer: metal ion-induced 1D assembly of a molecularly engineered chaperonin.
    Biswas S; Kinbara K; Oya N; Ishii N; Taguchi H; Aida T
    J Am Chem Soc; 2009 Jun; 131(22):7556-7. PubMed ID: 19489642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mechanism of substrate recognition by the chaperonin GroEL.
    Houry WA
    Biochem Cell Biol; 2001; 79(5):569-77. PubMed ID: 11716298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Topologies of a substrate protein bound to the chaperonin GroEL.
    Elad N; Farr GW; Clare DK; Orlova EV; Horwich AL; Saibil HR
    Mol Cell; 2007 May; 26(3):415-26. PubMed ID: 17499047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. GroEL-assisted protein folding: does it occur within the chaperonin inner cavity?
    Marchenkov VV; Semisotnov GV
    Int J Mol Sci; 2009 May; 10(5):2066-2083. PubMed ID: 19564940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Physicochemical Properties of the Mammalian Molecular Chaperone HSP60.
    Ishida R; Okamoto T; Motojima F; Kubota H; Takahashi H; Tanabe M; Oka T; Kitamura A; Kinjo M; Yoshida M; Otaka M; Grave E; Itoh H
    Int J Mol Sci; 2018 Feb; 19(2):. PubMed ID: 29415503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A monomeric variant of GroEL binds nucleotides but is inactive as a molecular chaperone.
    White ZW; Fisher KE; Eisenstein E
    J Biol Chem; 1995 Sep; 270(35):20404-9. PubMed ID: 7657615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stopped-flow fluorescence analysis of the conformational changes in the GroEL apical domain: relationships between movements in the apical domain and the quaternary structure of GroEL.
    Taniguchi M; Yoshimi T; Hongo K; Mizobata T; Kawata Y
    J Biol Chem; 2004 Apr; 279(16):16368-76. PubMed ID: 14734563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.