These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25002042)

  • 21. More on the hierarchy of propositions: exploring the distinction between explanations and propositions.
    Evett IW; Jackson G; Lambert JA
    Sci Justice; 2000; 40(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 10795422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Interpretation of complex forensic DNA mixtures.
    Ladd C; Lee HC; Yang N; Bieber FR
    Croat Med J; 2001 Jun; 42(3):244-6. PubMed ID: 11387631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Questions, propositions and assessing different levels of evidence: Forensic voice comparison in practice.
    Hughes V; Rhodes R
    Sci Justice; 2018 Jul; 58(4):250-257. PubMed ID: 29895456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. DNA profiling: evaluation of the evidentiary value.
    Bär W
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2003 Mar; 5 Suppl 1():S41-4. PubMed ID: 12935550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The likelihood approach to compare populations: a study on DNA evidence and pitfalls of intuitions.
    Taroni F; Aitken CG
    Sci Justice; 1999; 39(4):213-22. PubMed ID: 10795411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Source level interpretation of mixed biological stains using coding region SNPs.
    Dørum G; Bleka Ø; Gill P; Haas C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jul; 59():102685. PubMed ID: 35381476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A Logical Framework for Forensic DNA Interpretation.
    Hicks T; Buckleton J; Castella V; Evett I; Jackson G
    Genes (Basel); 2022 May; 13(6):. PubMed ID: 35741719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Least-square deconvolution: a framework for interpreting short tandem repeat mixtures.
    Wang T; Xue N; Birdwell JD
    J Forensic Sci; 2006 Nov; 51(6):1284-97. PubMed ID: 17199614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Activity level DNA evidence evaluation: On propositions addressing the actor or the activity.
    Kokshoorn B; Blankers BJ; de Zoete J; Berger CEH
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Sep; 278():115-124. PubMed ID: 28715673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Bayesian networks and the value of the evidence for the forensic two-trace transfer problem.
    Gittelson S; Biedermann A; Bozza S; Taroni F
    J Forensic Sci; 2012 Sep; 57(5):1199-216. PubMed ID: 22458915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Learning about Bayesian networks for forensic interpretation: an example based on the 'the problem of multiple propositions'.
    Biedermann A; Voisard R; Taroni F
    Sci Justice; 2012 Sep; 52(3):191-8. PubMed ID: 22841144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of different interpretation strategies for low template DNA mixtures.
    Pfeifer CM; Klein-Unseld R; Klintschar M; Wiegand P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):716-22. PubMed ID: 22739132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Probabilistic Genotyping Software STRmix: Utility and Evidence for its Validity.
    Buckleton JS; Bright JA; Gittelson S; Moretti TR; Onorato AJ; Bieber FR; Budowle B; Taylor DA
    J Forensic Sci; 2019 Mar; 64(2):393-405. PubMed ID: 30132900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. LoComatioN: a software tool for the analysis of low copy number DNA profiles.
    Gill P; Kirkham A; Curran J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Mar; 166(2-3):128-38. PubMed ID: 16759831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The predictive value of the maximum likelihood estimator of the number of contributors to a DNA mixture.
    Haned H; Pène L; Sauvage F; Pontier D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Aug; 5(4):281-4. PubMed ID: 20488773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A review of likelihood ratios in forensic science based on a critique of Stiffelman "No longer the Gold standard: Probabilistic genotyping is changing the nature of DNA evidence in criminal trials".
    Buckleton J; Robertson B; Curran J; Berger C; Taylor D; Bright JA; Hicks T; Gittelson S; Evett I; Pugh S; Jackson G; Kelly H; Kalafut T; Bieber FR
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 May; 310():110251. PubMed ID: 32203853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Validation of short tandem repeats (STRs) for forensic usage: performance testing of fluorescent multiplex STR systems and analysis of authentic and simulated forensic samples.
    Moretti TR; Baumstark AL; Defenbaugh DA; Keys KM; Smerick JB; Budowle B
    J Forensic Sci; 2001 May; 46(3):647-60. PubMed ID: 11373004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Forensic utility of mitochondrial DNA analysis based on denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography.
    LaBerge GS; Shelton RJ; Danielson PB
    Croat Med J; 2003 Jun; 44(3):281-8. PubMed ID: 12808719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Inference about the number of contributors to a DNA mixture: Comparative analyses of a Bayesian network approach and the maximum allele count method.
    Biedermann A; Bozza S; Konis K; Taroni F
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):689-96. PubMed ID: 22534257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Forensic interpretation of Y-chromosomal DNA mixtures.
    Wolf A; Caliebe A; Junge O; Krawczak M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Sep; 152(2-3):209-13. PubMed ID: 15978347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.