These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25002047)

  • 1. Issues and opportunities: the application of the numerical likelihood ratio framework to forensic speaker comparison.
    Gold E; Hughes V
    Sci Justice; 2014 Jul; 54(4):292-9. PubMed ID: 25002047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Likelihood-ratio forensic voice comparison using parametric representations of the formant trajectories of diphthongs.
    Morrison GS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Apr; 125(4):2387-97. PubMed ID: 19354412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of relevant data, quantitative measurements, and statistical models to calculate a likelihood ratio for a Chinese forensic voice comparison case involving two sisters.
    Zhang C; Morrison GS; Enzinger E
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Oct; 267():115-124. PubMed ID: 27592142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Refining the relevant population in forensic voice comparison - A response to Hicks et alii (2015) The importance of distinguishing information from evidence/observations when formulating propositions.
    Morrison GS; Enzinger E; Zhang C
    Sci Justice; 2016 Dec; 56(6):492-497. PubMed ID: 27914557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The case for aural perceptual speaker identification.
    Hollien H; Didla G; Harnsberger JD; Hollien KA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Dec; 269():8-20. PubMed ID: 27855301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modern statistical models for forensic fingerprint examinations: a critical review.
    Abraham J; Champod C; Lennard C; Roux C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Oct; 232(1-3):131-50. PubMed ID: 24053874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The expression and interpretation of uncertain forensic science evidence: verbal equivalence, evidence strength, and the weak evidence effect.
    Martire KA; Kemp RI; Watkins I; Sayle MA; Newell BR
    Law Hum Behav; 2013 Jun; 37(3):197-207. PubMed ID: 23750600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An Approach to Speaker Identification.
    Hollien H
    J Forensic Sci; 2016 Mar; 61(2):334-344. PubMed ID: 27404606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A demonstration of the application of the new paradigm for the evaluation of forensic evidence under conditions reflecting those of a real forensic-voice-comparison case.
    Enzinger E; Morrison GS; Ochoa F
    Sci Justice; 2016 Jan; 56(1):42-57. PubMed ID: 26746825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An empirical estimate of the precision of likelihood ratios from a forensic-voice-comparison system.
    Morrison GS; Zhang C; Rose P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 May; 208(1-3):59-65. PubMed ID: 21131149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Distinguishing between forensic science and forensic pseudoscience: testing of validity and reliability, and approaches to forensic voice comparison.
    Morrison GS
    Sci Justice; 2014 May; 54(3):245-56. PubMed ID: 24796954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measuring the validity and reliability of forensic likelihood-ratio systems.
    Morrison GS
    Sci Justice; 2011 Sep; 51(3):91-8. PubMed ID: 21889105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using subsampling to estimate the strength of handwriting evidence via score-based likelihood ratios.
    Davis LJ; Saunders CP; Hepler A; Buscaglia J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Mar; 216(1-3):146-57. PubMed ID: 22018850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Handwriting evidence evaluation based on the shape of characters: application of multivariate likelihood ratios.
    Marquis R; Bozza S; Schmittbuhl M; Taroni F
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jan; 56 Suppl 1():S238-42. PubMed ID: 21198625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Implementing statistical learning methods through Bayesian networks. Part 1: a guide to Bayesian parameter estimation using forensic science data.
    Biedermann A; Taroni F; Bozza S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Dec; 193(1-3):63-71. PubMed ID: 19833464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What should a forensic practitioner's likelihood ratio be?
    Morrison GS; Enzinger E
    Sci Justice; 2016 Sep; 56(5):374-379. PubMed ID: 27702454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lay understanding of forensic statistics: Evaluation of random match probabilities, likelihood ratios, and verbal equivalents.
    Thompson WC; Newman EJ
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Aug; 39(4):332-49. PubMed ID: 25984887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Strength of linguistic text evidence: A fused forensic text comparison system.
    Ishihara S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Sep; 278():184-197. PubMed ID: 28735218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bayesian interpretation of discrete class characteristics.
    McNevin D
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Nov; 292():125-130. PubMed ID: 30296628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the interpretation of likelihood ratios in forensic science evidence: Presentation formats and the weak evidence effect.
    Martire KA; Kemp RI; Sayle M; Newell BR
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Jul; 240():61-8. PubMed ID: 24814330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.