These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25002051)

  • 1. On the use of the likelihood ratio for forensic evaluation: response to Fenton et al.
    Biedermann A; Hicks T; Taroni F; Champod C; Aitken C
    Sci Justice; 2014 Jul; 54(4):316-8. PubMed ID: 25002051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. When 'neutral' evidence still has probative value (with implications from the Barry George Case).
    Fenton N; Berger D; Lagnado D; Neil M; Hsu A
    Sci Justice; 2014 Jul; 54(4):274-87. PubMed ID: 25002045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Response to "on the use of the likelihood ratio for forensic evaluation: response to Fenton et al.".
    Fenton N; Lagnado D; Hsu A; Berger D; Neil M
    Sci Justice; 2014 Jul; 54(4):319-20. PubMed ID: 25002052
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evidence evaluation: a response to the court of appeal judgment in R v T.
    Berger CE; Buckleton J; Champod C; Evett IW; Jackson G
    Sci Justice; 2011 Jun; 51(2):43-9. PubMed ID: 21605824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Discussion on how to implement a verbal scale in a forensic laboratory: Benefits, pitfalls and suggestions to avoid misunderstandings.
    Marquis R; Biedermann A; Cadola L; Champod C; Gueissaz L; Massonnet G; Mazzella WD; Taroni F; Hicks T
    Sci Justice; 2016 Sep; 56(5):364-370. PubMed ID: 27702452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the likelihood of "encapsulating all uncertainty".
    Martire KA; Edmond G; Navarro DJ; Newell BR
    Sci Justice; 2017 Jan; 57(1):76-79. PubMed ID: 28063591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of forensic evidence on criminal justice case processing.
    Peterson JL; Hickman MJ; Strom KJ; Johnson DJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Jan; 58 Suppl 1():S78-90. PubMed ID: 23106604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sizing up the evidence.
    Servick K
    Science; 2016 Mar; 351(6278):1130-2. PubMed ID: 26965601
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lay understanding of forensic statistics: Evaluation of random match probabilities, likelihood ratios, and verbal equivalents.
    Thompson WC; Newman EJ
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Aug; 39(4):332-49. PubMed ID: 25984887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of relevant data, quantitative measurements, and statistical models to calculate a likelihood ratio for a Chinese forensic voice comparison case involving two sisters.
    Zhang C; Morrison GS; Enzinger E
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Oct; 267():115-124. PubMed ID: 27592142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Weakening forensic science in Spain: from expert evidence to documentary evidence.
    Lucena-Molina JJ; Pardo-Iranzo V; Gonzalez-Rodriguez J
    J Forensic Sci; 2012 Jul; 57(4):952-63. PubMed ID: 22329955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Refining the relevant population in forensic voice comparison - A response to Hicks et alii (2015) The importance of distinguishing information from evidence/observations when formulating propositions.
    Morrison GS; Enzinger E; Zhang C
    Sci Justice; 2016 Dec; 56(6):492-497. PubMed ID: 27914557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Response to Aitken et al. on R v T.
    Faigman D; Jamieson A; Noziglia C; Robertson J; Wheate R
    Sci Justice; 2011 Dec; 51(4):213-4; author reply 215. PubMed ID: 22137057
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the interpretation of likelihood ratios in forensic science evidence: Presentation formats and the weak evidence effect.
    Martire KA; Kemp RI; Sayle M; Newell BR
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Jul; 240():61-8. PubMed ID: 24814330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Issues and opportunities: the application of the numerical likelihood ratio framework to forensic speaker comparison.
    Gold E; Hughes V
    Sci Justice; 2014 Jul; 54(4):292-9. PubMed ID: 25002047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The expression and interpretation of uncertain forensic science evidence: verbal equivalence, evidence strength, and the weak evidence effect.
    Martire KA; Kemp RI; Watkins I; Sayle MA; Newell BR
    Law Hum Behav; 2013 Jun; 37(3):197-207. PubMed ID: 23750600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Posterior distributions for likelihood ratios in forensic science.
    van den Hout A; Alberink I
    Sci Justice; 2016 Sep; 56(5):397-401. PubMed ID: 27702459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What should a forensic practitioner's likelihood ratio be?
    Morrison GS; Enzinger E
    Sci Justice; 2016 Sep; 56(5):374-379. PubMed ID: 27702454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measuring the validity and reliability of forensic likelihood-ratio systems.
    Morrison GS
    Sci Justice; 2011 Sep; 51(3):91-8. PubMed ID: 21889105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the value of probability for evaluating results of comparative pattern analyses.
    Biedermann A; Taroni F
    Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Oct; 232(1-3):e44-5. PubMed ID: 24029074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.