These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

333 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25002369)

  • 41. Siting MSW landfills with a spatial multiple criteria analysis methodology.
    Kontos TD; Komilis DP; Halvadakis CP
    Waste Manag; 2005; 25(8):818-32. PubMed ID: 15946837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A GIS-based novel approach for suitable sanitary landfill site selection using integrated fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and machine learning algorithms.
    Mohsin M; Ali SA; Shamim SK; Ahmad A
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 May; 29(21):31511-31540. PubMed ID: 35001277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Using Geographic Information Systems to Determine Site Suitability for a Low-Level Radioactive Waste Storage Facility.
    Wilson CA; Matthews K; Pulsipher A; Wang WH
    Health Phys; 2016 Feb; 110(2 Suppl 1):S17-25. PubMed ID: 26710161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Siting MSW landfills on Lesvos island with a GIS-based methodology.
    Kontos TD; Komilis DP; Halvadakis CR
    Waste Manag Res; 2003 Jun; 21(3):262-77. PubMed ID: 12870646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Use of a geographic information system to find areas for locating of municipal solid waste management facilities.
    Colvero DA; Gomes APD; Tarelho LADC; Matos MAA; Santos KAD
    Waste Manag; 2018 Jul; 77():500-515. PubMed ID: 29735361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Sorting of suitable areas for disposal of construction and demolition waste using GIS and ELECTRE TRI.
    Biluca J; de Aguiar CR; Trojan F
    Waste Manag; 2020 Aug; 114():307-320. PubMed ID: 32688063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Landfill site selection using multi criteria decision making: Influential factors for comparing locations.
    Rezaeisabzevar Y; Bazargan A; Zohourian B
    J Environ Sci (China); 2020 Jul; 93():170-184. PubMed ID: 32446453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Landfill site selection using MCDM methods and GIS in the central part of the Nile Delta, Egypt.
    Armanuos AM; Elgaafary KA; Gado TA
    Environ Monit Assess; 2023 Nov; 195(12):1407. PubMed ID: 37917338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Integration of LCSA and GIS-based MCDM for sustainable landfill site selection: a case study.
    Mozaffari M; Bemani A; Erfani M; Yarami N; Siyahati G
    Environ Monit Assess; 2023 Mar; 195(4):510. PubMed ID: 36964894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Site selection and environmental risks assessment of medical solid waste landfill for the City of Kermanshah-Iran.
    Karimi H; Herki B; Gardi SQ; Galalizadeh S; Hossini H; Mirzaei K; Pirsaheb M
    Int J Environ Health Res; 2022 Jan; 32(1):155-167. PubMed ID: 32183563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Selection of MSW landfill site for Konya, Turkey using GIS and multi-criteria evaluation.
    Nas B; Cay T; Iscan F; Berktay A
    Environ Monit Assess; 2010 Jan; 160(1-4):491-500. PubMed ID: 19169836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Site suitability evaluation of an old operating landfill using AHP and GIS techniques and integrated hydrogeological and geophysical surveys.
    Saatsaz M; Monsef I; Rahmani M; Ghods A
    Environ Monit Assess; 2018 Feb; 190(3):144. PubMed ID: 29453617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Multi-criteria GIS-based siting of an incineration plant for municipal solid waste.
    Tavares G; Zsigraiová Z; Semiao V
    Waste Manag; 2011; 31(9-10):1960-72. PubMed ID: 21600754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Identifying problems for choosing suitable areas for installation of a new landfill through GIS technology: a case study.
    Nascimento VF; da Silva AM
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2014 Jan; 64(1):80-8. PubMed ID: 24620405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A worldwide meta-analysis review of restriction criteria for landfill siting using geographic information systems.
    Fernandez Nascimento V; Loureiro AIS; Andrade PR; Guasselli LA; Ometto JPB
    Waste Manag Res; 2021 Mar; 39(3):409-426. PubMed ID: 33100193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Information system with multiple data layer approach to select the C&D waste landfilling infrastructure.
    Ding Z; Zhu M; Wu H; Zuo J
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Nov; 27(31):38788-38804. PubMed ID: 32632690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Sanitary landfill site selection using GIS-based on a fuzzy multi-criteria evaluation technique: a case study of the City of Kraljevo, Serbia.
    Durlević U; Novković I; Carević I; Valjarević D; Marjanović A; Batoćanin N; Krstić F; Stojanović L; Valjarević A
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Mar; 30(13):37961-37980. PubMed ID: 36576628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Allocation of sanitary landfill in consortium: strategy for the Brazilian municipalities in the State of Amazonas.
    Damasceno Pavani I; Ennes Cicerelli R; de Almeida T; Zandonadi Moura L; Contreras F
    Environ Monit Assess; 2018 Dec; 191(1):39. PubMed ID: 30593596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. GIS and the analytic hierarchy process for regional landfill site selection in transitional countries: a case study from Serbia.
    Zelenović Vasiljević T; Srdjević Z; Bajčetić R; Vojinović Miloradov M
    Environ Manage; 2012 Feb; 49(2):445-58. PubMed ID: 22134738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Landfill site selection via integrating multi-criteria decision techniques with geographic information systems: a case study in Naqadeh, Iran.
    Khorsandi H; Faramarzi A; Aghapour AA; Jafari SJ
    Environ Monit Assess; 2019 Nov; 191(12):730. PubMed ID: 31705330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.