These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25003050)

  • 41. Evaluation of adding item-response theory analysis for evaluation of the European Board of Ophthalmology Diploma examination.
    Mathysen DG; Aclimandos W; Roelant E; Wouters K; Creuzot-Garcher C; Ringens PJ; Hawlina M; Tassignon MJ
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Nov; 91(7):e573-7. PubMed ID: 23927770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Composite undergraduate clinical examinations: how should the components be combined to maximize reliability?
    Wass V; McGibbon D; Van der Vleuten C
    Med Educ; 2001 Apr; 35(4):326-30. PubMed ID: 11318994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A Prospective Cohort Study Using e-Learning Modules as a Supplemental Teaching Resource for Obstetrics and Gynaecology Clerkship Students.
    Kim J; Coolen J
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2015 Sep; 37(9):819-823. PubMed ID: 26605453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Quantitative analysis of single best answer multiple choice questions in pharmaceutics.
    Al Muhaissen SA; Ratka A; Akour A; AlKhatib HS
    Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2019 Mar; 11(3):251-257. PubMed ID: 30904146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Identification of parameters for electronic distance examinations.
    Richter R; Tipold A; Schaper E
    Front Vet Sci; 2024; 11():1385681. PubMed ID: 38962711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Very Short Answer Questions: A Novel Approach To Summative Assessments In Pathology.
    Sam AH; Peleva E; Fung CY; Cohen N; Benbow EW; Meeran K
    Adv Med Educ Pract; 2019; 10():943-948. PubMed ID: 31807109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Analysis of one-best MCQs: the difficulty index, discrimination index and distractor efficiency.
    Hingorjo MR; Jaleel F
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2012 Feb; 62(2):142-7. PubMed ID: 22755376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Test-retest reliability of multiple true-false questions in preclinical medical subjects.
    Schwartz PL; Crooks TJ; Sein KT
    Med Educ; 1986 Sep; 20(5):399-406. PubMed ID: 3762442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A novel student-led approach to multiple-choice question generation and online database creation, with targeted clinician input.
    Harris BH; Walsh JL; Tayyaba S; Harris DA; Wilson DJ; Smith PE
    Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 25893940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Pick-N multiple choice-exams: a comparison of scoring algorithms.
    Bauer D; Holzer M; Kopp V; Fischer MR
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2011 May; 16(2):211-21. PubMed ID: 21038082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [ECoLaE: Validation of a questionnaire on breastfeeding knowledge and skills for Nursing].
    Lechosa Muñiz C; Cobo Sánchez JL; Herrera Castanedo S; Cornejo Del Río E; Mateo Sota S; Sáez de Adana Herrero M
    Aten Primaria; 2020; 52(6):373-380. PubMed ID: 31522791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Psychometric properties of the Halstead Category Test.
    Lopez MN; Charter RA; Newman RJ
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2000 May; 14(2):157-61. PubMed ID: 10916189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. It takes only 100 true-false items to test medical students: true or false?
    Pamphlett R
    Med Teach; 2005 Aug; 27(5):468-72. PubMed ID: 16147803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Impact of different scoring algorithms applied to multiple-mark survey items on outcome assessment: an in-field study on health-related knowledge.
    Domnich A; Panatto D; Arata L; Bevilacqua I; Apprato L; Gasparini R; Amicizia D
    J Prev Med Hyg; 2015; 56(4):E162-71. PubMed ID: 26900331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Choosing medical assessments: Does the multiple-choice question make the grade?
    Pham H; Trigg M; Wu S; O'Connell A; Harry C; Barnard J; Devitt P
    Educ Health (Abingdon); 2018; 31(2):65-71. PubMed ID: 30531047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Validity of very short answer versus single best answer questions for undergraduate assessment.
    Sam AH; Hameed S; Harris J; Meeran K
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Oct; 16(1):266. PubMed ID: 27737661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Item analysis of examinations in the Faculty of Medicine of Tunis.
    Hermi A; Achour W
    Tunis Med; 2016 Apr; 94(4):247-252. PubMed ID: 27704506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Single best answer MCQs: a new format for the FRCR part 2a exam.
    McCoubrie P; McKnight L
    Clin Radiol; 2008 May; 63(5):506-10. PubMed ID: 18374712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Item analysis and optimizing multiple-choice questions for a viable question bank in ophthalmology: A cross-sectional study.
    Bhat SK; Prasad KHL
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2021 Feb; 69(2):343-346. PubMed ID: 33463588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A psychometric analysis of a newly developed summative, multiple choice question assessment adapted from Canada to a Middle Eastern context.
    Pawluk SA; Shah K; Minhas R; Rainkie D; Wilby KJ
    Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2018 Aug; 10(8):1026-1032. PubMed ID: 30314537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.