These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25003561)

  • 1. On the reduced influence of contour on saccade metrics and its competition with stimulus size.
    Massendari D; Tandonnet C; Vitu F
    Vision Res; 2014 Aug; 101():158-66. PubMed ID: 25003561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stimulus properties and saccade metrics: when local features are more critical than global features.
    Tandonnet C; Vitu F
    Behav Neurosci; 2013 Feb; 127(1):121-5. PubMed ID: 23231495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. When larger visual distractors become less disruptive: behavioral evidence for lateral inhibition in saccade generation.
    Tandonnet C; Massendari D; Vitu F
    J Vis; 2012 Apr; 12(4):. PubMed ID: 22493008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of foveal distractors on saccadic eye movements: a dead zone for the global effect.
    Vitu F; Lancelin D; Jean A; Farioli F
    Vision Res; 2006 Dec; 46(28):4684-708. PubMed ID: 17049960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Saccade target selection: Do distractors affect saccade accuracy?
    Findlay JM; Blythe HI
    Vision Res; 2009 Jun; 49(10):1267-74. PubMed ID: 18691610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the limited effect of stimulus boundaries on saccade metrics.
    Tandonnet C; Casteau S; Vitu F
    J Vis; 2013 Oct; 13(12):13. PubMed ID: 24133293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A fresh look at saccadic trajectories and task irrelevant stimuli: Social relevance matters.
    Laidlaw KE; Badiudeen TA; Zhu MJ; Kingstone A
    Vision Res; 2015 Jun; 111(Pt A):82-90. PubMed ID: 25906682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the spatial interaction of visual working memory and attention: evidence for a global effect from memory-guided saccades.
    Herwig A; Beisert M; Schneider WX
    J Vis; 2010 May; 10(5):8. PubMed ID: 20616119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stimulus-salience and the time-course of saccade trajectory deviations.
    van Zoest W; Donk M; Van der Stigchel S
    J Vis; 2012 Aug; 12(8):16. PubMed ID: 22923727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Looking away: distractor influences on saccadic trajectory and endpoint in prosaccade and antisaccade tasks.
    Laidlaw KE; Zhu MJ; Kingstone A
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Jun; 234(6):1637-48. PubMed ID: 26838359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The spatial impact of visual distractors on saccade latency.
    McSorley E; McCloy R; Lyne C
    Vision Res; 2012 May; 60():61-72. PubMed ID: 22469779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Differential effect of a distractor on primary saccades and perceptual localization.
    Eggert T; Sailer U; Ditterich J; Straube A
    Vision Res; 2002 Dec; 42(28):2969-84. PubMed ID: 12480069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How global is the global effect? The spatial characteristics of saccade averaging.
    Van der Stigchel S; Nijboer TC
    Vision Res; 2013 May; 84():6-15. PubMed ID: 23523571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The visual properties of proximal and remote distractors differentially influence reaching planning times: evidence from pro- and antipointing tasks.
    Heath M; DeSimone JC
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Nov; 234(11):3259-3268. PubMed ID: 27405998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interaction between visual- and goal-related neuronal signals on the trajectories of saccadic eye movements.
    White BJ; Theeuwes J; Munoz DP
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Mar; 24(3):707-17. PubMed ID: 22066585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Saccadic context indicates information processing within visual fixations: evidence from event-related potentials and eye-movements analysis of the distractor effect.
    Graupner ST; Pannasch S; Velichkovsky BM
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Apr; 80(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 21291920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Oculomotor interference of bimodal distractors.
    Heeman J; Nijboer TC; Van der Stoep N; Theeuwes J; Van der Stigchel S
    Vision Res; 2016 Jun; 123():46-55. PubMed ID: 27164053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modulation of saccadic inhibition by distractor size and location.
    Buonocore A; McIntosh RD
    Vision Res; 2012 Sep; 69():32-41. PubMed ID: 22842403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gaze and arrow distractors influence saccade trajectories similarly.
    Hermens F; Walker R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Nov; 63(11):2120-40. PubMed ID: 20486017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predictability of spatial and non-spatial target properties improves perception in the pre-saccadic interval.
    Born S; Ansorge U; Kerzel D
    Vision Res; 2013 Oct; 91():93-101. PubMed ID: 23954813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.